For me, it is a good thing that Pakistan is engaging in a multipolar foreign policy strategy (if that is what it be) rather than being the poodle of one particular power regardless of who that power may be.I dont think this is damage control. These visits are part of regular interaction between the 2 armies and arranged well in advance. Even if US has played dirty with us, we will play it down rather than act hurt.
You are right in that Pakistan is at a difficult cross road where connectivity of the CPEC and extension into Central Asia will open doors for its progress which it has not seen ever. Increasing trade with central asia will blank out the 6-8 billion trade with the US.
However the matter is one of assuring the powers that be-that our aim is purely economic furthering of Pakistani interests. It maybe that there are specific US reservations about trade routes to Russia but genuinely they cannot object to trade with Central Asia. The counter could be to invite their trade delegation to come and invest in CPEC industrial zone, a move which the US might CURRENTLY not accept, but also it might allay their anxieties about being kept out of the CPEC loop.
On the military front it may all be about Pak wish to get credit from the US for its role in helping US out of Afghanistan. The US might want to restart the joint training programmes and invite Pakistan to attend the annual exercises which Pakistan will accept. I think Pakistan will again raise the issue of CSF dues which would be politely refused, but I think there is no issue in asking and we should ask for what we consider to be ours. There will be mutual back patting for Pakistan's role as major non Nato allie publically while behind closed doors there will be issues raised regarding Pakistan's support of Afghan Taliban, which would be diplomatically rebuffed. The future would be looked at and I think Pakistan will be forceful in its commitment to the West without equating US friendship with its relations with China. The only thing if it comes up (diplomatically it does not make sense) is-Pak anxieties about US interests in India instead of Pakistan, and while this would be taken as extension of US trade interests we might gently ask for similar access to US markets and avenues to increase trade. It may be decided to invite trade delegations from both sides to explore the possibilities, and it will be taken up on goverent to government basis
Kashmir will come up and US will restate its policy of being a mediator if both parties agree.
I do not think any arms will be requested nor granted. There maybe perks offered to the Chief and I will not comment on that. However I do not think much more than that will go on. I know this is an army chief's visit so a lot of political messages maybe passed around but deferred to inter-governmental level discussions.
As to the US if it wants to play dirty it will play dirty. However I do not see any advantage in doing so in the long term. Much more likely it will use all means to maintain pressure on the government.
A
Every country must show that it has options if it is to avoid being dictated to by any one side, and to be fair, this is the first time in its history Pakistan has had the chance to play this particular game. Previously, with the bi polar cold War environment and with the Indians and Soviets being in each others pockets, Pakistan didn't have a choice but to throw in it's lot with the Americans, regardless of how the Americans chose to treat Pakistan.
The world has changed and Pakistan's geo strategic position is more significant and important than it has ever been to both sides.
Let's see how well Pakistan plays its cards.