Clash of Civilizations-Your Views-Are really in a us versus them scenario?

[XTREME]

i dont know what islam you talking about read the incscription in a mosque in bejing it say nation is my first religion jinha was a nationalist he was cheated by neru thou , iqbal the famous poet was a nationalist even the rulers muguals or anyone else were regional they prefered centeral asian and arabs over indian muslims and called us hindus in their court instead a hindu king chh shivaji maharaj was supported by muslims he had muslim sardars of indian origin and his army consisted of 30% muslim solider and that was all because of national feeling

Man if I would describe it, would take a 1 long day.

 

[Black Widow]

My opinion world union.

Go GREEN....

I don't know how easily people neglect Islamic Civilization which ruled over the World for 1300 years.

Nationalism is forbidden in Islam.

Ruled over world for 1300 years is exaggerated statement.... Nationalism Vs Islam... Debatable question, i doubt if all pakistani endorse your interpretation of Islam.... For sure Indians are not agree with you

 

[raje]

Man if I would describe it, would take a 1 long day.

that a good way to avoid it right inspired by you diplomacy

---------- Post added at 03:36 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:35 PM ----------

Go GREEN....





Ruled over world for 1300 years is exaggerated statement.... Nationalism Vs Islam... Debatable question, i doubt if all pakistani endorse your interpretation of Islam.... For sure Indians are not agree with you

why you agree with him????

 

[Perceptron]

I'm surprised this topic has never been discussed! But anyways.

This sort of has a connection with the Asian Union Theory.

Basically the Clash of Civilization theory, is that people's cultural and religious identities will be the primary source of conflict in the post-Cold War world according to Samuel P Huntington.

Do you Agree or Disagree?

A map of civilizations, based on Huntington's "Clash of Civilizations". Western (dark blue), Latin (purple), Japanese (bright red), Sinic (dark red), Hindu (orange), Islamic (green), Orthodox (medium-light blue), African (Brown), Buddhist (yellow). Other colors should indicate (light green, turquoise) the cultural fault lines where the clash of civilizations will occur. Note on the Eastern European level; Transylvania (from Romania), Western Ukraine, northern Serbia and others are in the "Western world" according to the original work of Huntington.


I copied this stuff from wikipedia with slight modifications.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~
Relating with Asian Union Theory, a Asian Union will not be like "EU", but and Asian Union would be more like the Islamic civilization, Chinese civilization, Indian civilization, and Buddhist civilization and Russia working together against the West.


The Latin American civilization, African civilization, Japanese civilization, and other civilizations are "swing" civilizations siding with whoever suits their interests best.

This is what could happen if Asian Union Theory is practiced.

Since Asian Union Theory is not practiced, instead it is Indian civilization, Russia, and Latin American civilization that are the swing civilizations.


What are your views?

For all the misguided ones here on the "Clash of Civilizations" notion, i strongly encourage you to watch this complete video

.
Watch especially from 6.10 on. As Hasan Nisar correctly points out, this is not a Clash of Civilizations. This is a Clash of faiths that the Media intends to paint as a Clash of Civilizations farce. He further asks

Those guys(The West) have civilizations ; What civilization do you have ? Adulteration of milk to increase your moolah ? Increasing the weight of goats through injecting water ? Adulteration of life-saving drugs ?

The common man is more concerned with the issues of corruption and mismanagement, scraping through the next meal for himself, than with the overdose of religion and civilization and what not.

 

[Kadamba]

I'm surprised this topic has never been discussed! But anyways.

This sort of has a connection with the Asian Union Theory.

Basically the Clash of Civilization theory, is that people's cultural and religious identities will be the primary source of conflict in the post-Cold War world according to Samuel P Huntington.

Do you Agree or Disagree?

I totally disagree dude. In my opinion,
In Toady's world no Civilization is entirely uniform on both cultural and religious fronts. Which means they have diversity on either cultural or religious fronts. These diversities(cultural and/or religious) are themselves the internal fault lines of a Civilization, which will never allow the entire civilization to unify, for good. Hence we can comfortably say that since civilizations themselves wont be able to unify completely, their build up to engage in conflict with another civilization is out of question.

 

[Don Jaguar]

Go GREEN....

Post # 7.

 

[roadrunner]

I'm surprised this topic has never been discussed! But anyways.

This sort of has a connection with the Asian Union Theory.

Basically the Clash of Civilization theory, is that people's cultural and religious identities will be the primary source of conflict in the post-Cold War world according to Samuel P Huntington.

The clash of civilization theory has been discussed before. Like then, I would say that it is fictional and for the purposes of dividing people.

You can see on that stupid map that people are divided according to religion in some cases, race in other cases, and language sometimes.

It comes from foreign policy to suit whatever time frame that is needed.

 

[Hussein]

peace and love my friends

or maybe you need a Timur to make the world like meadows

 

[Developereo]

Two comments:

1. Mr. Huntington was smoking some high grade Colombian produce when he came up with this idea.
2. I want some too.

 

[Subramanian]

I don't know how easily people neglect Islamic Civilization which ruled over the World for 1300 years.

Nationalism is forbidden in Islam.

which world and which 1300 years? and who is neglecting it and what do u mean by nelglect here?

 

[pmukherjee]

I don't know how easily people neglect Islamic Civilization which ruled over the World for 1300 years.

Nationalism is forbidden in Islam.

The land that you are calling the 'Islamic civilisation' actually encompasses very ancient civilisations. The Egyptian civilisation is more than 4000 years old as is the Mesopotamian and the Persian civilisation. The land on which Pakistan exists today is the one over which the Indus Valley Civilisation flourished 4000 years ago. All these civilisations predate Islam by nearly 2500 years. Does religion imply civilisation? I think not. If that be the foundation of your thesis, then why not paint all of Russia and South America in deep blue and call the whole big blue blob the Christian civilisation?

Religion does not make up a civilisation, it is a very small component of it. Tell me, how can Indonesians, Kuwaitis, Iranians, Turks and Bosnian Muslims be part of the same civilisation? Just because they are all Muslims?
Are Russians from Vladivastok, Americans from Boston, Peruvians and Filipinos part of the same civilisation because they are all Christians?

As a Bengali Hindu, I find that I have more in common with Bangladeshis than I have with say, a Malayali from Kerala or someone from Goa. Religion is not an issue here at all.

 

[Vimana]

This really is a stupid thread for sure

 

[illuminatidinesh]

This really is a stupid thread for sure

That is one post I agree the most......

 

[dabong1]

I think it will be more a "clash of ideologies" then a clash of civilizations.

 

[Avisheik]

Clashes between countries may occur, but clashes between civilisation or religion is very unlikely