What's new

CJCSC calls on air chief, apprised of PAF modernisation programmes

Nope , my and zarvan bhai's reasons referring to PM are different and yes like i said before , I request all Mods/admins to ban me if SU-35 or eft even breathes a bit of pakistani atmosphere.
Wow....that's what I call confidence but atleast you partially agree with @Zarvan that J10 C's are coming to Pakistan....
 
.
Wow....that's what I call confidence but atleast you partially agree with @Zarvan that J10 C's are coming to Pakistan....
i never said they are coming but i do wish J-10Cs to take on Mirages role at 15 and 27 Sqns for Tactical Attack. Since deltas are wayy more suitable than thunder in that case
 
.
I suggest PAF straightly go for J10c, cause it has internal mechanism to absorb radar wave.

@MarvellousThunder@PDC why you guys claim that Nawaz is pushing Su35 down to PAF's throat and it's his sugar milk?
 
. .
We have a nice little fighter and enough artillery to pummel the Indian front line. We need a strategic bomber to neutralise the Indian second line to reduce their threat. Not sure what PAF is playing at, when India cuts off the water it will be war and we need to prepare now for the eventuality.
No Bro strategic bombers is waste of resources, we need deep & heavy strike jet like Su-34, F-15E, J-16, F-111, Su-24:disagree:, For this purpose we have standoff weapon

There is no fanboys stuff if you are not following things or you have no idea what is going on with PAF than it's your problem ours. The moment Pakistan realized that Rafale deal of India is going forward we were looking for a Fighter. PAF main choices are EFT and Su-35 but they are more focused on EFT and Nawaz is pushing towards SU-35. As for J-10 C well that is going to come soon. Your denial is only amusing
What your source? but you don't have a source don't, you:enjoy: you live in your fantasy world wishful thinking get out of your wet dream sir:lol:
J-10 B/C are some serious machines @TOPGUN
When? in 2200:rofl::lol::sarcastic: J-10C, JF-17Blk-3 will have almost same capabilities, If we will have BLK-3 in future there will be no need of almost same capable J-10C:blah::blah::blah::blah::blah::blah::blah:
 
.
Block 3 and J10 C can never be the same.
1.Basic design of both aircrafts very different
2.Hardpoints not the same(8 for thunder and 11 for J10)
3.ordnance carrying ability also different
 
.
No Bro strategic bombers is waste of resources, we need deep & heavy strike jet like Su-34, F-15E, J-16, F-111, Su-24:disagree:, For this purpose we have standoff weapon


What your source? but you don't have a source don't, you:enjoy: you live in your fantasy world wishful thinking get out of your wet dream sir:lol:

When? in 2200:rofl::lol::sarcastic: J-10C, JF-17Blk-3 will have almost same capabilities, If we will have BLK-3 in future there will be no need of almost same capable J-10C:blah::blah::blah::blah::blah::blah::blah:
No matter how much you upgrade a light weight fighter (thunder) , it wont match the level of a medium weight fighter (J-10C) , J-10 is a delta-canard config plane. It has its own role suitabilitoes different from Thunder and similar to Mirages
 
.
No matter how much you upgrade a light weight fighter (thunder) , it wont match the level of a medium weight fighter (J-10C) , J-10 is a delta-canard config plane. It has its own role suitabilitoes different from Thunder and similar to Mirages
I would not agree on this sir, you have no logic in your comment, if your comment is true than why all superpowers is using crop tailed delta wing like F-18 E, Su-33, MIG-29K and J-15 and JH-7 for maritime role why they don't developed deltas for their maritime use:disagree::azn::o::what:o_O if delta wing is that great for maritime operations
 
.
We need at least 120 j-10Bs, before induction of stealth fighters
 
.
I would not agree on this sir, you have no logic in your comment, if your comment is true than why all superpowers is using crop tailed delta wing like F-18 E, Su-33, MIG-29K and J-15 and JH-7 for maritime role why they don't developed deltas for their maritime use:disagree::azn::o::what:o_O if delta wing is that great for maritime operations
I never asked deltas for maritime role. Thunders are well designed to take on mirages existing PAF roles easily and efficiently. What i was saying is that your quote " Having block 3 wont give us a need of J-10 of SIMILAR capabilities which is wrong. J10C is in a league of its own. It is very different from block 3. Has superior Radar , avionics to some extent , and yes engine off course and automatically payload. So comparing Block 3 to J10c in every aspect is wrong. J10c is a pure medium weight fighter , has 11 Hp - dual racks whereas Thunder can have 10-11 in the presence of dual racks

We need at least 120 j-10Bs, before induction of stealth fighters
Any reason to backup your claim. Keeping in mind PAF's strategic needs , where it needswhat type of fighter , is that fighter available for that role already here or not ? , If not available then what are the options available to you and how reasonable are they.? are those options meeting excess requirements?
 
.
I never asked deltas for maritime role. Thunders are well designed to take on mirages existing PAF roles easily and efficiently. What i was saying is that your quote " Having block 3 wont give us a need of J-10 of SIMILAR capabilities which is wrong. J10C is in a league of its own. It is very different from block 3. Has superior Radar , avionics to some extent , and yes engine off course and automatically payload. So comparing Block 3 to J10c in every aspect is wrong. J10c is a pure medium weight fighter , has 11 Hp - dual racks whereas Thunder can have 10-11 in the presence of dual racks


Any reason to backup your claim. Keeping in mind PAF's strategic needs , where it needswhat type of fighter , is that fighter available for that role already here or not ? , If not available then what are the options available to you and how reasonable are they.? are those options meeting excess requirements?
Accept or not, we have only handful f-16 to counter su-30 and rafails, we need a multi task fully loaded j. 10 B type fighter to attack deep targets in india
 
.
We need at least 120 j-10Bs, before induction of stealth fighters
48 is a fine number.

The relationship between Pakistan and India is not so tense now, so PAF won't hurry to get extra fighters. It depends on the extent of pressure India pose on Pakistan.
 
.
Accept or not, we have only handful f-16 to counter su-30 and rafails, we need a multi task fully loaded j. 10 B type fighter to attack deep targets in india
for attacking deep targets , you have well equipped strategic forces .
 
.
There is no fanboys stuff if you are not following things or you have no idea what is going on with PAF than it's your problem ours. The moment Pakistan realized that Rafale deal of India is going forward we were looking for a Fighter. PAF main choices are EFT and Su-35 but they are more focused on EFT and Nawaz is pushing towards SU-35. As for J-10 C well that is going to come soon. Your denial is only amusing


All Mirages should be replaced with J-10 C and INSHALLAH will be

Hi,
Sir, can we really come out from our fantasy world and our PAF show us the actual picture whats gonna happen?
Do we really have counter plan to face Rafale and Indian SU's?

or we will just keep fantasies that we will have EFT or SU35??? :blah::blah::blah:

Sir, you always comes up with surprising news, so is this really gonna happen now? what you just said about EFT and SU35 or just a dream like always?
because we all remember last time you said soon (in a month or few) we all will see in news from PAF about new fighter inductions?

In my opinion!
Can't we just wait and see what PAF is going to do to face indians fighters.?
because when someone talk about (Mighty jet F-SOOOOOLLAAA)... for some PDF fanboy "including me" is like crap news.... because if we will not get F-16 with AESA is like useless for us. anyways..

like always, lets hope maybe this time PAF will do something in real.
 
Last edited:
.
more f 16 jf block 3 and fc 31 . paf wnt go for another jet.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom