AbhijitSingh
BANNED
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2012
- Messages
- 450
- Reaction score
- 0
Trolling and counter trolling are counter productive, you guys will get nowhere with this except on the 'Wall of Shame' thread.
Ok. sir.. I am shutting up now...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Trolling and counter trolling are counter productive, you guys will get nowhere with this except on the 'Wall of Shame' thread.
As I said that the Conquest of Constantinople (Istanbul) is the best example. The city was captured 900 years after the hadees. When a person can predict an event 900 years before it took place then it was not difficult for him to make this prediction too. AND in the Hadees it is written that the "Muslims of Hindustan along with other muslim armies" will fight against the Hindus of Hindustan......The Muslims of Hindustan now have separate land called "PAKISTAN". hope I now u r satisfied. Search about this hadees and your every doubt will be cleared as my has!!
What about suffering of Kashmiris?
I don't want Kashmir as territory, just the liberation of the people.
Oh but you missed the question I asked you is it ok to kill and rape Muslims?Pandit or not Pandit; Muslims have been an overwhelming majority in Kashmir for centuries. Have you forgotten how unpopular that Sikh/Hindu ruler was even during British times? So much for representing his people
yes we r, then face it if u dont want another 1971.
Oh but you missed the question I asked you is it ok to kill and rape Muslims?
If he was alive he would have attested that making Pakistan itself was a mistake.. not because of what he thought but what it has become..Another 71
Keep dreaming; the loss of Bengal was more natural then it could be...they should have been a separate nation to start with. Having one wing mostly surrounded by hostile state and separate from the other wing by hundreds, maybe thousands of hostile territory...how the heck was that even possible? Quaids mistake, unfortunately.
Another one of those scenarios, however, isn't happeng, it's not exactly possible any more.
Another 71
Keep dreaming; the loss of Bengal was more natural then it could be...they should have been a separate nation to start with. Having one wing mostly surrounded by hostile state and separate from the other wing by hundreds, maybe thousands of hostile territory...how the heck was that even possible? Quaids mistake, unfortunately.
Another one of those scenarios, however, isn't happeng, it's not exactly possible any more.
Coming to your repsonse, do you want to say that the rule of British and their proxy state was popular enough? lol at your ignorance!
You are doing that right now
Same in Sindh, Balochistan.. also lets put things into perspective, you guys are also helpless when innocent are killed by foreign powers.. be it Taliban your our creation, TTP and what not!You are doing that right now
then take ur ppl, u wont get land. simple
It is perfectly understandable. However, if you wish to sidestep my response and yours based on mine, you are free to do so..Lol at your idiocy and English skills. Your post hardly makes any sense, go re-write it.
i am a sikh and according to zaid hamid i am also supposed to help muslims invade india yes i will help them bury dead pakistani soldiers in the graveyard somewhere in karachi.