You mean it's already happening?
You have some sick fantasies man.I have met many Muslim convert Chakmas, they are really happy people. They get well assimilated into BD's hotchpotch culture, na Muslim na Hindu. The Chakma girls are very welcoming. In my varsity days I could easily get into my classmates skirtsVery strange culture. The girls themselves take onto local Bazar to take them in just after crossing the puberty age.
What the hell are you on about? BD is being very friendly under AL, India on the other hand has fully let religious hardliners influence its policy at an increasing human cost.Entire Bangladesh was part of India but now its a different country. Dear my Indian friends, lets cooperate together and be friendly rather than annexing Bangladesh territory into India. we are allies forever.
And this guy is afraid of single border.. That tells everything.
You wanted Assamese homogeneity. Why crying now?
No, tribals(Khasi, Manipuri etc.) voted in that referendum. Only group not allowed to vote were the tea garden laborer. Why they should? They were recent migrants from madhya pradesh, Jharkhand,Tamil nadu state of India. They were floating population. Frequently moved from one tea garden to another. Had no permanent dwelling. Such group of people do not deserve to cast vote in a referendum. Even if they were allowed to vote, the result would have been the same, only margin would have narrowed. Because more than 60 percent of total population was Muslims and they overwhelming voted for East Bengal.
It is 57:43 in favor of Pakistan merger. Margin was more than 55000 votes. So it was a strong verdict.
Aside from your wet dream, 90 percent of undivided Sylhet district is within Bangladesh. Only 3 and half Thana of erstwhile Karimganj sub division of Sylhet remain with Assam. Which now constitute Karimganj district in Assam. While Bangladeshi undivided Sylhet district now divided into 4 district.(Sylhet, Sunamganj, Moulovibazar, Habiganj). Karimganj was cut-off from Sylhet, because it contained the road infrastructure connecting to Tripura and Mizoram with rest of India. Had Karimganj came to East Pakistan, Tripura would have no other option but to join east Pakistan.
Just reminding you lot that what's given could well be taken back.
Load of cr@p, 1.2L votes for the Indian faction were declared invalid and about 2 lakh tea garden labourers were not allowed to vote in the referendum. Your notion that they were from elsewhere holds no ground as they were here in Assam for centuries already. Also the fact that, the labourers were allowed to cast their in prior assembly elections such as in the 1946 ones. Bangladesh has a long inglourious history of mistreating its tribals and adivasis.
The question is about the lands which were under Bengal, the question is not what Rajbongshis say. Our own Santals do not regard themselves as not Bengali but they are part of us. Bihar and Jharkhand were part of Bengal for many centuries. So what if they do not term themselves as Bengalis? Similarly many parts of western Assam were part of Bengal.
Sylhet was not given, it returned to it's rightful, natural places which is Bengal after 73 years. Just because it was transferred from Bengal to Assam by British in 1874 AD does not mean it was a natural part of Assam. Since at least Sena dynasty, it was always part of Bengal and it's population are Bengalis. It 1874, Assam was separated from Bengal presidency, but it's revenue potential was very low. So, Assam's governor appealed to Viceroy to transfer Sylhet from Bengal to Assam to boost it's revenue collection and make Assam a viable province. So Sylhet was transferred 6 months later after Assam's separation. But neither Bengalis nor Assamese liked this move. There was civil movement in Sylhet during 1920s and 1930s to return to Bengal. Which ultimately realized through 1947 referendum at the satisfaction of both Bengalis and Assamese.
You quoted my earlier post but failed to grasp the underlying message. The parts of Western Assam that you often tomtom about were always a part of present day Assam starting from the Kamarupa Kingdom who defeated your Bakhtiyar Khilji's troops and were in control even in your Sylhet(contrary to what you people think, Sylhet was always a historical part of Assam) to the Koch Kingdom which later splintered. Even then, Hajo near present day Guwahati was the seat of the aptly named Koch Hajo kingdom. The influence extended all the way west to Goalpara and Dhuburi and even beyond and remained that way till your Mymensinghia miyas flooded Dhuburi/Goalpara in the British era and subsequently after independence too, to change the demography. There is absolutely no Bangladeshi influence in Lower Assam, both historically and culturally, apart from the na-asomiya Mymensinghia illegals.
Not all citizen had voting rights during British period. Most of the people had no voting right. Sylhet had 3.1 million people, but only about 5.5 lakhs had voting rights. If tea garden laborer were allowed to vote, then voting persons would have been no more than 40 thousands. These number of votes in favor of India would not have altered the ultimate result. Only margin would have narrowed. You need to study more about these facts before claiming things.
So you are telling me that a group of people who voted in the 1946 provincial elections in Assam(Sylhet) suddenly found themselves ineligible to vote only a year later. Great logic!
Where did you get this bullsh!t? Even during Sena dynasty in 10th-11th century, it was ruled by local hindu princes under the suzerainty of Bengal. In 1303 AD it was came under Bengal Sultanate. In later period of Sultanate, it separated from Bengal sultanate and become a separate Muslim sultanate named Muazzamabad whose capital was Jalalabad, which is now known as Sylhet city. During Mughal period, it was a part of Bengal Subah. East India company took over Sylhet in 1765 as a part of Bengal. And it remained with Bengal presidency up to 1874 AD. In the last 1000 years, it was never came under any Assamese kingdom's rule. So, cut this bullcrap and read some history.
Even in 1946 election, most of the adult population including tea laborer had no voting rights. Please read some history about voting system in that period before talking ridiculous. Tea laborer who voted in 1946 election, voted just to choose a MP, this is not as crucial as a referendum deciding which state Sylhet should belong. So they were allowed to vote as a citizen of the country in 1946 general election. But in a referendum deciding the fate of Sylhet, only bonafide, genuine Sylheti were entitled to decide this matter of such a gravity. Tea laborer did not fulfill this criteria. They were a floating population, many came to Sylhet just a few decades ago. No one will accept such voter in such a crucial referendum.
He is the pet fifth columnist of this sub section
