What's new

Chinese Missiles News & Discussions

...

J-15 a copy of Su-33 has much higher thrust engine, using 3D printing and composite to produce lighter and stronger airframe than old Su-33. The avionics has a massive upgrade of using AESA radar compare to doppler pulse Su-33.

.../


Again NO, it uses exactly the same engines, is probably a bit lighter but avionics-wise uses the same radar like the J-11B ... only the J-15A or T if You like maybe.
 
DF-21C on the plateau

addf83d649709a9_size394_w980_h545.png
 
On what basics?
Sorry, I mean to say Buk M3 as its target-destruction probability has reached 0.9999 and its maximum destruction range now stands at 70 kilometers. A battery of Buk-M3 missiles can track and engage up to 36 targets simultaneously, while its advanced 9R31M missile is capable of knocking down all existing flying objects, including highly maneuverable ones, even during active electronic jamming.
 
Sorry, I mean to say Buk M3 as its target-destruction probability has reached 0.9999 and its maximum destruction range now stands at 70 kilometers. A battery of Buk-M3 missiles can track and engage up to 36 targets simultaneously, while its advanced 9R31M missile is capable of knocking down all existing flying objects, including highly maneuverable ones, even during active electronic jamming.
Buk M3 is different beast compare to Tor M. You are comparing and Apple to orange. Saying Russian Tor M is better than HQ-17 is actually without basics and no backing.
 
Buk M3 is different beast compare to Tor M. You are comparing and Apple to orange. Saying Russian Tor M is better than HQ-17 is actually without basics and no backing.
For short range, FM-90 is enough for Pakistan.
 
Back
Top Bottom