What's new

Chinese media: Troop increase violates India's deal with China

Funny you even put India in the line to have it compared with America. India is behind China as we speak other than fake freedom and useless democracy. But it is ok to believe otherwise, no one can help you if your choice of a cure is mental masturbation. Good if it eases your pain and frustration, but don't expect reality to change and resemble your moist dreams anytime soon. :lol:

personal attacks!!!!!!!!that is the best you can come up with????

same old story can't make any meaningful point try personal attack by adding some rhetoric words to make it sound cool!!!!!!





3487638251
 
.
in short........main karo toh sala character dhilla

typical chinese paranoa
 
. .
with all the thing that china is so great,india is slum,china has most advance tech,"superior troops",and all the other :blah: :blah: why are they concerned with india deploying 89k soldiers,doesnt china have 2m+ troops miles ahead of what india has
 
.
That did not deter Pakistan from attacking India in 48, 65 & 71 and as recently as Kargil. Regardless of consequences or the outcome so your logic failed. Compare that, India is yet to attack China - its only war of words!

Not everyone is as stupid as Pakistan
Why fight a war becoz of a Grudge
 
.
Hey chinese buddies,don't worry..
Its just deployed because of your activities in that part of border has increased and we are worrying about that thing..
Also 89,000 soldiers are nothing compared to your 22 divisions in tibet..
Then How would you fight a war if you are afraid of just 89,000 soldiers....
 
.
There is nothing in the deals that binds India not to increase the troop count. China has done it and India is doing it too. Chinese media just like Indian media goes nuts from time to time.

:cheers:
 
.
with all the thing that china is so great,india is slum,china has most advance tech,"superior troops",and all the other :blah: :blah: why are they concerned with india deploying 89k soldiers,doesnt china have 2m+ troops miles ahead of what india has

Considering our imported weapons and our professional army courses , I would say we have the advanced weapons and qualitative edge.
 
.
chinese crying "u have 4000 troops in pakistan occupied kashmir and teaching us the sanity lol,,,," this is one of the best move our military has taken atleast they hve tken lessons frm 1962.

and the crux is v hve not posted these people they r yet to be enrolled whereas chinese are taking aggresive approach by mobilizing troops on their side. so it is our reply...
 
.
"India's troop increase along the disputed border areas with China is an offensive act," said Zhao Gancheng, director of South Asia Studies at the Shanghai Institute for International Studies (SIIS).
Oh yeah? And what about the 30 PLA divisions inducted into Tibet not so long ago? Were they sent to Tibet for an extended holiday?

Considering their excellent infrastructure and logistic nodes they have built in the last couple of years on the Tibetan plateau, their formations would take little time in concentrating their forces at decision points. India on the other hand has to contend with treacherous terrain unlike the Tibetan plateau which means China will be faster off the blocks than India which, therefore has no option but to deploy its troops closer to the border.
 
. .
I have got an interesting article on PLA new activities in Tibet... Whats our Chinese friends will tell on this..

INCREASING MILITARY ACTIVITIES

Meanwhile, Chinese military activities in the region have expanded. In July 2010, the official newspaper of the PLA, People’s Liberation Army Daily, reported that units of the People’s Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF) were engaging in armed combat air patrols. These are believed to have been advanced Su-27 or J-11 (domestically produced versions of the Su-27) fighter aircraft.

The combat air patrols were followed by an August 2010 logistics exercise involving the newly constructed Qinghai-Tibet railway. This exercise marked the first PLAAF use of the railway for military purposes, with the Military Transportation Department of the PLAAF Logistics Department overseeing the movement of “combat readiness materials” to Tibet. This would seem to reflect a growing PLAAF role in maintaining security along the Sino-Indian border in the Tibetan area.

In October 2010, there were reports that the PLA had conducted joint (inter-services) live-fire exercises in Tibet for the first time. These reportedly involved armour, artillery, air, and electronic warfare units and a variety of new equipment. Given the emphasis placed on joint operations in PLA doctrine, such exercises are not surprising, but instead reflect the extent to which they are being applied across the military, not just opposite Taiwan.

Indian expert observers do not interpret China’s new-found assertiveness as preparation for imminent conflict, and they continue to calculate that the overall probability of another Sino-Indian war is low. However, they believe China may be trying to enhance its bargaining position in the ongoing border negotiations. The Indian observers note that incursions across the disputed borders are likely aimed at gaining tactical advantage to bolster Chinese territorial claims.

India has somewhat belatedly sought to match the Chinese moves and to reinforce its own claims in the disputed border areas by augmenting forces and constructing roads along the shared frontiers. These measures include the deployment of two squadrons of Su-30 MKI fighter jets in Assam and the raising of two mountain divisions for deployment in Arunachal Pradesh. India also has redeployed elements of its 27th Mountain Division from Jammu and Kashmir to the patch of land that intersects India, Tibet, and Bhutan and links India with the rest of its northeastern states.

India is reviving air fields along the border with China, including one in the Ladakh region.

India must increasingly factor the potential threat of conflict over its disputed borders with China into its security planning and projections. While Indian strategists assess that Pakistan poses the most immediate threat to India, they increasingly view China as the more important long-term strategic threat.

In order to deter Chinese aggression along India’s border, Indian strategists believe they must develop the capability to inflict severe damage on Chinese forces in Tibet. China has an edge over India with regard to overall air power. Given infrastructure constraints in Tibet, however, China’s ability to deploy significant air power on the border with India remains in question.

The China Challenge: A strategic vision for U.S.-India relations | Expert Zone
 
.
Vietnamese nickname is "boat people".don't have a home,but floating around waiting to be taken.

"Boat people" to me is meaning nothing for a country during new revoluion. People always panic and try to run out to find they best shelters, some will find a good one, some will find the dead end. That's will happend for any country during national cricis.

Let me ask you, "Why your China beautiful and wealthy still let Chinese people living any countries and now even in Africa?"

I think you still remember what Japanese soldiers named Chinese right? More than that, Chinese people was slaves for US to build a rail roads.

So, Vietnam not best but still better than China that they people not turning to be slave, and not be "boat people" for very years.


Even how bad Chinese think, thought about Indians, but this how Indian shows to the World and let World make judgements.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L5uhgsTs6x0&feature=related
 
.
yes you right back in 1962 our economy and millitary is roughly the same as india if not worse, Now our economy is 4x india and our millitary is 25 years ahead if there s another 1962 today i m sure chinese will be the official language of india.

Yeah u will win the war with dollars isnt it?? we are not here for a rummy match where money matters the most.. Back in 1962 our borders were left unguarded, we couldnt gaurd as we had a leader who was smoking **** now we will have sufficent men on the border , remember @$$ in 1962 there were 10-12 K indian soldiers on the borders and to over come them u chinese pussies sent 80 k soldiers and still had causilities above 800, now we will have around 200 K men now u chinese silles have to send ur whole PLA to even stand a chance to our men, crossing the borders and gaining territory forget it

and yeah before coming to war be prepared to fight a long deadly bloody battle cause our men dont surrender no matter what, ur best friends can give many examples regarding that..
 
.
That did not deter Pakistan from attacking India in 48, 65 & 71 and as recently as Kargil. Regardless of consequences or the outcome so your logic failed. Compare that, India is yet to attack China - its only war of words!

Thats because in todays world, india and china both have too much to loose to start a war from either side.
Same cannot be said about pakistan, poor nation have nothing to loose.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom