Chinese Flanker Family: J-11, J-16 ... Su-27SK/UBK, Su-30MKK

[doorstar]

Does anyone have a version of this image without the orange boxes? ... and are these PL-15s without the fins for the first time under the intakes?
View attachment 915416
View attachment 915418

click to enlarge

from: https://www.sohu.com/a/637794934_36...k8_93_Qq9dRe_1_fd.6.1675674000010DA5oXoZ_1090

 

[doorstar]

Does anyone have a version of this image without the orange boxes?

https://twitter.com/x/status/1622767579801722880

 

[Deino]

click to enlarge
View attachment 915420
from: https://www.sohu.com/a/637794934_36...k8_93_Qq9dRe_1_fd.6.1675674000010DA5oXoZ_1090

Thanks a lot!

 

[LKJ86]

 

[LKJ86]

J-11BS

Via http://eng.chinamil.com.cn/HOME_209227/Focus_209228/16200973_3.html

 

[LKJ86]

J-16

Via @东部战区 from Weibo

 

[Deino]

J-16
View attachment 916293View attachment 916294View attachment 916295View attachment 916296View attachment 916297View attachment 916298
Via @东部战区 from Weibo

7th Air Brigade!

 

[LKJ86]

J-11B

Via http://www.81.cn/kj_208559/jdt_208560/16201817.html

 

[LKJ86]

J-11BH and J-11BSH

Via @中国军视网 from Weibo

 

[LKJ86]

J-16

Via @空军在线 from Weibo

 

[Ronnie Maxwell]

a well-kept secret the result of speculators' speculation. At the time being, neither a formal evaluation nor a formal interest in it exist. For the time being, Pakistani defence doctrine is built on single-engine aircraft, which are inexpensive to operate and have a higher flying proficiency rate. The small maritime area we must defend is readily defended by single-engine aircraft, and the AEW&C would operate as a force multiplier by allowing the PAF and PN plenty of time to respond to any hostile actions by India.

Yes, if the Chinese WS-10A engine enters service and Russian IPRs are not violated or Russia grants permission. Nevertheless, for the time being and in the near future, no.


All we need is a JF-17 or FC-20 with an F-16 to be more than sufficient.

 

[Deino]

a well-kept secret the result of speculators' speculation. At the time being, neither a formal evaluation nor a formal interest in it exist. For the time being, Pakistani defence doctrine is built on single-engine aircraft, which are inexpensive to operate and have a higher flying proficiency rate. The small maritime area we must defend is readily defended by single-engine aircraft, and the AEW&C would operate as a force multiplier by allowing the PAF and PN plenty of time to respond to any hostile actions by India.

Yes, if the Chinese WS-10A engine enters service and Russian IPRs are not violated or Russia grants permission. Nevertheless, for the time being and in the near future, no.


All we need is a JF-17 or FC-20 with an F-16 to be more than sufficient.

What has this post to do with the topic?

 

[LKJ86]

Via http://www.81.cn/kj_208559/16202651.html

 

[LKJ86]

J-16

Via @前站起飞 from Weibo

 

[Deino]

Thanks to my dear friend @EK_Valensvek … my PLAAF Flanker family collection is slowly growing!