Chinese can't 'see' McMahon line

[Speeder]

Leaving aside all the childish bravado, you all missed an important point.

The natives of Arunchal Pradesh (to whom the land belongs) do not want to be with China. They want to be with India where they will have freedom of religion and be able to practice their democratic rights

WTF? No "Line" anymore?

I was planning to raise the issue of "Speeder Line" - sounds very English , huh? Now the "Speeder Line" runs fast and furious, starting from Delhi, reaching southward right through the middle of Bangalore... Can't you Indians see? Oh, yeah!

Now on religions ?

Never heard of those numerous Maoist regions down there? I am pretty sure those regions would like to join China to be able to freely practise and celebrate their religion in Mao's homeland.

Fancy some land switch?

 

[aimarraul]

Please don't embarass yourself. As per the 2001 census, the total population is around 1Million people. So that means there was no one living in AP before? And that the people who migrated into AP had 0% growth rate?

I think you are projecting your guilt of Han chinese immigration into Xingjiang and Tibet

AP also has special provisions in the indian constitution that prevents outsiders to buy property e.t.c. and protect indigeneous culture and tribes in AP. Similar to the article 370 for J&K and in states like nagaland and HP.

And maybe in PRC, what the people think doesn't matter, but outside China, it does.

again,who cares how many indian are living in there.sorry to let to know,Xinjiang and Tibet is not the disputed area....xinjiang was one of the china's trading center even 800 years ago.....can't indian see the red line around the AP in international map .....

 

[Honor]

McMahon line is illigal as Chinese did not signed that Simla Accord. That's why Chinese can't see McMahon line.

Indian used McMahon line (British legacy) to seize more territories.

To have a proper border, both sides have to negotiate and set a line for both to recognise. I believe that is tough as both side had their interest to take care.

 

[EjazR]

WTF? No "Line" anymore?

I was planning to raise the issue of "Speeder Line" - sounds very English , huh? Now the "Speeder Line" runs fast and furious, starting from Delhi, reaching southward right through the middle of Bangalore... Can't you Indians see? Oh, yeah!

Now on religions ?

Never heard of those numerous Maoist regions down there? I am pretty sure those regions would like to join China to be able to freely practise and celebrate their religion in Mao's homeland.

Fancy some land switch?

Offtopic, respond to what I said about what the natives of AP want

 

[EjazR]

again,who cares how many indian are living in there.sorry to let to know,Xinjiang and Tibet is not the disputed area....xinjiang was one of the china's trading center even 800 years ago.....

These Indians are natives of AP, so yes they matter.

What I said was Xinjiang and Tibet have been under a policy of enforced Han Chinese immigration. AP along with J&K and Nagaland have not because of special provision in the Indian consitituon. Or is that too hard to understand?

 

[grey boy 2]

Even your old Brittish master apologise for McMahan line !!

On October 29 last year, British foreign secretary David Miliband announced that the previous British actions, including the Simla Accord (1913) and thus the McMahon Line, had been an anachronism and a colonial legacy. He apologized to China for not having renounced those actions earlier. The British “apology” knocks down the very basis of India’s stand on the Sino-Indian border dispute. It is unclear what India’s reaction to all this, including Miliband’s statement, was because India never unambiguously expresses its sensitivities on specific issues to the concerned countries. This is so even in the case of Sri Lanka. It is time we started stating our views clearly, if not loudly, when the issues affect us. So end of your so call McMahon line.

Hariharan's Intelligence blog: Perils of a US-China Marriage of Convenience

 

[EjazR]

Even your old Brittish master apologise for McMahan line !!

On October 29 last year, British foreign secretary David Miliband announced that the previous British actions, including the Simla Accord (1913) and thus the McMahon Line, had been an anachronism and a colonial legacy. He apologized to China for not having renounced those actions earlier. The British “apology” knocks down the very basis of India’s stand on the Sino-Indian border dispute. It is unclear what India’s reaction to all this, including Miliband’s statement, was because India never unambiguously expresses its sensitivities on specific issues to the concerned countries. This is so even in the case of Sri Lanka. It is time we started stating our views clearly, if not loudly, when the issues affect us. So end of your so call McMahon line.

Hariharan's Intelligence blog: Perils of a US-China Marriage of Convenience

McMohan line or not, this is a bilateral issue and there is no need to bring the British here. The native people of AP or their elected representatives don't want to be with China. That's why the article was posted.

 

[WarProfessor]

McMohan line or not, this is a bilateral issue and there is no need to bring the British here. The native people of AP or their elected representatives don't want to be with China. That's why the article was posted.

Who give a damn about what they think. What they need to think is to pay back what they owe to us by setting structures and maintaining their lousy lives on our land. No Chinese visa, they all don't have human rights on that land.

 

[EjazR]

Who give a damn about what they think. What they need to think is to pay back what they owe to us by setting structures and maintaining their lousy lives on our land. No Chinese visa, they all don't have human rights on that land.

With that attitude, no wonder the people Arunahcal don't want China. Infact, no wonder people in Xinjiang and Tibet don't want to be with China as well

 

[grey boy 2]

McMohan line or not, this is a bilateral issue and there is no need to bring the British here. The native people of AP or their elected representatives don't want to be with China. That's why the article was posted.

When the so call McMohan line was being stated as illegal by your

old Brittish master who drew this stupid line.

Any kind of your so call election or representatives in A.P became

ILLEGAL, get it ?

 

[WarProfessor]

With that attitude, no wonder the people Arunahcal don't want China. Infact, no wonder people in Xinjiang and Tibet don't want to be with China as well

It doesn't matter what they want, we couldn't care less. It's our land. Chinese land is not open for negotiation.

 

[Gabbar]

When the so call McMohan line was being stated as illegal by your

old Brittish master who drew this stupid line.

Any kind of your so call election or representatives in A.P became

ILLEGAL, get it ?

Old tibet goverment then recognized the AP as a part of India and signed the the pappers. Now dont bring that Chinese government didn't signed that. Tibet had its own govrnment then, before Chinese forces took control of tibet and Dalai Lama fled India.

 

[EjazR]

It doesn't matter what they want, we couldn't care less. It's our land. Chinese land is not open for negotiation.

Your chinese masters dont think so. They want to negotiate.

Besides, back in 2005 China had agreed that there will be no exchange of populated areas, only changes in demarcation.

So believe me, your masters, are not as much interested in this as you seem to be. Or maybe you don't know that because there is ban on political activities in China

 

[Gabbar]

It doesn't matter what they want, we couldn't care less. It's our land. Chinese land is not open for negotiation.

Typical facist.

 

[WarProfessor]

Typical facist.

Then India certainly has a facist constitution.