I'm guessing it's the holographic HUD.
Surprised they need to cover it. Anyways we are going past the need for HUD.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm guessing it's the holographic HUD.
Surprised they need to cover it. Anyways we are going past the need for HUD.
Looks the same compare to the F18 cockpit. It looks like you manage to catch up to some fighter introduced in the 80s.
USS Enterprise had the phase array decades ago on the first nuclear carrier.
You notice there is no need for the HUD like the Chinese aircraft.
New improved phase array on the Ford. Kind of a contradictory on your statement.
Without catapult, the combat effectiveness of J-15 is indeed very limited. That is why some Indian members keep thinking that J-15 is only able to carry 2000 kg of weapon. Let me add here using ski jump to launch J-15 it could not carry full load of its fuel too, which will limit its combat radius as well. I don't know how ski jump launch will affect Mig-29K here, but when J-15 and Mig-29K are launched from Liaoning or any Indian carriers, their weapon load and range would not be that big.What ever makes people good night sleep but the reality is what i speak
CHinese Carrier $20 million is far better and superior then Indian more then $2 billion.
Chinese J-15 is far superior then Expensive Mig 29
Chinese say their carrier is training Ship and indian say their carrier is front line ship.
Chinese carrier is operational with J-15 Fighter and indian carrier needs help to save her A$$ .
If Indian carrier see's chinese carrier with all the modern weapon system will start Sh$TTing in Indian ocean
Give them some time Chinese nuclear power carrier will be roaming all around the globe .
Without catapult, the combat effectiveness of J-15 is indeed very limited. That is why some Indian members keep thinking that J-15 is only able to carry 2000 kg of weapon. Let me add here using ski jump to launch J-15 it could not carry full load of its fuel too, which will limit its combat radius as well. I don't know how ski jump launch will affect Mig-29K here, but when J-15 and Mig-29K are launched from Liaoning or any Indian carriers, their weapon load and range would not be that big.
From Russia's experience with Kuznetsov class carrier, taking off using ski jump by aircraft with takeoff weight exceeding some 26 tons is very difficult. The empty weight of J-15 already 17.5 tons, and its full fuel load is 9.5 tons. Yes, it might be able to launch with ski jump with full fuel load, but this also means it can not carry anymore weapons.Who told you that?
2 130KN+ turbofan engines will easily the propel a J-15 into the air with full fuel.
From Russia's experience with Kuznetsov class carrier, taking off using ski jump by aircraft with takeoff weight exceeding some 26 tons is very difficult. The empty weight of J-15 already 17.5 tons, and its full fuel load is 9.5 tons. Yes, it might be able to launch with ski jump with full fuel load, but this also means it can not carry anymore weapons.
The problem here is this 1 ton reduction here is not significant enough to make a difference here, because this is not just about the difference in acceleration where the weight increase can be offset by the increase in the force linearly. It is lift force we are talking about. 2L(lift force)=C(lift coeffient)*p(fluid density)*S(planform area)*v(true airspeed)^2. let's assume that C, p and S are the same for both Su-33 and J-15. v=Thrust/Weight*t. Trust/Weight=2Distance/time^2. Also since it is carrier operation the Distance has to be the same for both aircraft You can try the numbers here to see if those change is significant to grant J-15 full load of operation requirement using 26 ton as a threashold for Su-33.SU-33 has 2 125Kn engines.
J-15 is also lighter than the Su-33 by nearly 1 tonne.
We can all do the math here.
The problem here is this 1 ton reduction here is not significant enough to make a difference here, because this is not just about the difference in acceleration where the weight increase can be offset by the increase in the force linearly. It is lift force we are talking about. 2L(lift force)=C(lift coeffient)*p(fluid density)*S(planform area)*v(true airspeed)^2. let's assume that C, p and S are the same for both Su-33 and J-15. v=Thrust/Weight*t. Trust/Weight=2Distance/time^2. Also since it is carrier operation the Distance has to be the same for both aircraft You can try the numbers here to see if those change is significant to grant J-15 full load of operation requirement using 26 ton as a threashold for Su-33.