So what type of election does china have ?Yeah where the big papa befor leaving his office elects his new stooge.U have mistaken it for election buddy,which is only a privilege of the free nations of the world, and not some slave population like urs.
Poverty and prosperity in any land are ephermal parts of the all pervading history.It just took 200 years of looting by the british for India to convert from the golden bird to a destitute country.And it will not take more than 20 years for India to reach that pinnacle again.Though ur wet dreams of being the sole global power would be cut short in the process ,sorry for that .
democracy is a process that has been adopted by the 187 countries ,all courtesy to modern british parliamentary system.And it works wel for us.Soryy to inform u but we are not interested in ur retarted system of ringaringaroses election.
Stop giving lame excuses again! Your India was only looted by mainly one country (UK), China was looted by eight countries (Austria-Hungary, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States). Now see how big is the difference today!
Since later 1940s, both India and China were in the same league. But
you incredible democracy put you far behind China today.
Among 187 or whatever number countries adopting democracy, only those looter countries (such as European countries and USA) are successful. None other democratic countries are that successful. Do you know why? Because
1) politicians in those backward countries but educated and brainwashed in strong Western countries gullibly believe that it is because democracy that make the western countries strong.
2) those students were fooled or otherwise completely brainwashed to believe that simply adopting western system and taking time thereafter will automatically make their countries strong irrespective of the social soils and material richness that are indispensable for the system.
3) They failed to realize that a week and democratic countries can never become formidable opponents of western powers, because they only copy/paste the invention of the West, and are therefore prone to western influence/teaching, and therefore are strongly advocated by western powers. (BTW, please screw rumors that you have democracy 5000 years ago; if so China has it 10000 years ago as then the leaders were also elected by tribes, too.)
Examples? Thailand, Kyrgyzstan, India
Mao is one million times more smart and brilliant than Gandhi/other Indian politicians on this aspect.
That lays the foundation for todays sharp contrast of achievements between the two countries. Lots recent researches find that without the foundation laid by Mao, Deng Xiaoping's open-up won't work. Manufacture sector, China's economic engine, is a typical example of that assertion.
That is also precisely why West keeps demonizing China all the time, because China model put Western value system in question, while West
turns a blind eye to Indias more blatant and more ferocious human rights violation, because negating India is negating Western value.
BTW, if you are interested in knowing Chinese system, pull out your head from sand and study relevant materials on the web.
