What's new

China's R&D investment 2nd in the world

China has numerous scientific and engineering achievements in recent year,space science,military breakthrough,medical accomplishments,supercomputers,clean energy...China sent men to the space and the bottom of the sea,polar explorationt China is also on the front row..

China 'to overtake US on science' in two years

David Shukman Science and environment correspondent, BBC News

China is on course to overtake the US in scientific output possibly as soon as 2013 - far earlier than expected.

That is the conclusion of a major new study by the Royal Society, the UK's national science academy.

The country that invented the compass, gunpowder, paper and printing is set for a globally important comeback.

An analysis of published research - one of the key measures of scientific effort - reveals an "especially striking" rise by Chinese science.

“Start Quote

There are many millions of graduates but they are mandated to publish so the numbers are high”

Dr Cong Cao Nottingham University

The study, Knowledge, Networks and Nations, charts the challenge to the traditional dominance of the United States, Europe and Japan.

The figures are based on the papers published in recognised international journals listed by the Scopus service of the publishers Elsevier.

In 1996, the first year of the analysis, the US published 292,513 papers - more than 10 times China's 25,474.

By 2008, the US total had increased very slightly to 316,317 while China's had surged more than seven-fold to 184,080.

Previous estimates for the rate of expansion of Chinese science had suggested that China might overtake the US sometime after 2020.

But this study shows that China, after displacing the UK as the world's second leading producer of research, could go on to overtake America in as little as two years' time.

"Projections vary, but a simple linear interpretation of Elsevier's publishing data suggests that this could take place as early as 2013," it says.

Professor Sir Chris Llewellyn Smith, chair of the report, said he was "not surprised" by this increase because of China's massive boost to investment in R&D.

Chinese spending has grown by 20% per year since 1999, now reaching over $100bn, and as many as 1.5 million science and engineering students graduated from Chinese universities in 2006.

"I think this is positive, of great benefit, though some might see it as a threat and it does serve as a wake-up call for us not to become complacent."

The report stresses that American research output will not decline in absolute terms and raises the possibility of countries like Japan and France rising to meet the Chinese challenge.

"But the potential for China to match American output in terms of sheer numbers in the near to medium term is clear."

China emerging as innovation leader



China is aggressively pursuing innovation and R&D patent protections as the more developed regions of the world slash development and research budgets in the current global recession.



According to the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) U.S. applications for patents protecting new inventions were flat in 2008 and 2009 while in China patent applications jumped 18.2 percent in 2008 and another 8.5 percent in 2009. A copy of the report is available here.



"China is moving up the value chain and rapidly increasing exports based on domestic innovation, so inevitably it is filing an ever-growing number of patent applications," the WIPO chief told a news conference as it released its latest findings.



Filings for patents dropped 7.9 percent in Europe and 10.8 percent in Japan last year, with filings from Germany, Britain and France also lower according to the WIPO.



Meanwhile, Chinese filings for trademark protection jumped 20.8 percent last year, as similar applications fell 11.7 in the United States, 7.7 percent in Germany and 7.2 percent in Japan.



"The post-crisis innovation landscape will invariably look different from that of a decade ago," WIPO Director-General Francis Gurry said in an introduction to the World Intellectual Property Indicators report.



Elsewhere in the developing world, intellectual property protection efforts are also on the upswing. Beyond China, other emerging nations with double-digit growth in patent filings include Belize, Peru, Romania and Turkey in 2008.

WIPO Chief Economist Carsten Fink said China's ample cash reserves allowed it to continue financing innovation in a time when loans and venture capital were difficult to come by.



There is a tremendous pool of finance for domestic investment in R&D and industrial design the report notes, adding noting that "the post-crisis innovation landscape will invariably look different from that of a decade ago" he noted.

China patent filings could overtake US, Japan in 2011
China is projected to lead in patent activity by 2011, according to a detailed intellectual property (IP) analysis published by the IP Solutions business of Thomson Reuters. China's patents focus has continued to be digital computing, a trend started in the 1990s/2000s outsourcing boom to China, but increasingly these are Chinese companies, not multinational parent companies, filing, says Thomson Reuters.

The study, "Patented in China II: The Present and Future State of Innovation in China," tracks global patent activity as a barometer for innovation across dozens of metrics to provide a view into China’s innovation economy.
 
. .
With England hands YES, and imagination for China rule without England hands so what HK going to be?
Hongkong's GDP overtaken by Shanghai already,and will be overtaken by Beijing soon.

Rankings: Top 20 global cities of 2020, projected

By Andrew Nusca | April 18, 2011, 7:43 AM PDT

The fourth Knight Frank Global Cities Survey was recently published by Citi Private Bank, designed to monitor “city-level power shifts” by assessing global markets for investment opportunities and influence on business leaders worldwide.

The survey offered a list of the top 25 global cities of 2011, but also offered a number of other rankings — so many that we had to break them up into separate posts.

Below, the list predicting what would be the “world’s leading cities in 10 years’ time.”

Your Top 20 global cities of 2020, projected:

New York
London
Shanghai
Beijing
Hong Kong
 
.
Hongkong's GDP overtaken by Shanghai already,and will be overtaken by Beijing soon.

LOL, here in Hong Kong we really don't need anymore Vietnamese immigrants.

Hong Kong city has only 7 million people, but our economy is TWICE the size of Vietnam's economy even though they have almost 100 million people.

Also... like you said, Shanghai and Beijing are already surpassing Hong Kong. I've been to both Beijing and Shanghai, and they look more modern than Hong Kong does, because their infrastructure and buildings are much newer.
 
.
LOL, here in Hong Kong we really don't need anymore Vietnamese immigrants.

Do you know what the heck you saying?
Hong Kong city has only 7 million people, but our economy is TWICE the size of Vietnam's economy even though they have almost 100 million people.

Also... like you said, Shanghai and Beijing are already surpassing Hong Kong. I've been to both Beijing and Shanghai, and they look more modern than Hong Kong does, because their infrastructure and buildings are much newer.

Stop it? Did I make comparison from HK to Vietnam? You just a very simple one of "High IQ" indeed. Read more think twice before your start statement.
 
.
Here is a picture that one of the Chinese members here posted, it is of his "village" (in Zhongguan) in the northwestern parts of Beijing.

img559914.jpg


And that is not even in the city center.

Next, try looking at Pudong in Shanghai, that looks more modern than any part of my own city of Hong Kong.

5236424710_ae1a3211be.jpg
 
.
OK, botom line is:

Does those cities [HK,SH,Macao] rule by China goverment? Which City rule by China hand be equal more than HK,Shanghai,Macao?
 
.
OK, botom line is:

Does those cities [HK,SH,Macao] rule by China goverment? Which City rule by China hand be equal more than HK,Shanghai,Macao?

Shanghai's economy has surpassed Hong Kong's economy, and Beijing will follow soon.

Shanghai is administered by the Chinese government, and Hong Kong too. But in Hong Kong, we can vote for up to half the members of LegCo.

We can't select who leads the Hong Kong government though, that decision is made by Beijing.

In Hong Kong, we have never been able to vote for our top leaders, they have always been appointed. Hong Kong has never had full democracy or universal suffrage.
 
.
Shanghai's economy has surpassed Hong Kong's economy, and Beijing will follow soon.

Shanghai is administered by the Chinese government, and Hong Kong too. But in Hong Kong, we can vote for up to half the members of LegCo.

We can't select who leads the Hong Kong government though, that decision is made by Beijing.

In Hong Kong, we have never been able to vote for our top leaders, they have always been appointed. Hong Kong has never had full democracy or universal suffrage.

Like I said, atleast not last HK used to have democrat more than in Mainland. If you were HKnese, you will know before 1997 how many times HK police lured Chinese came from Mainland. Don't know what happend by now in HK. [You'll probaly don't know if you were young enogh] My company and myself was in Kowloon in 1995 did some business in there.
 
.
Like I said, atleast not last HK used to have democrat more than in Mainland. If you were HKnese, you will know before 1997 how many times HK police lured Chinese came from Mainland. Don't know what happend by now in HK. [You'll probaly don't know if you was young enogh] My company and myself was in Kowloon in 1995 did some business in there.

I'll say it again, Hong Kong has never had full democracy. Check it yourself, we can vote for up to half the members of LegCo, but all the top leaders have always been made by appointment.

You claim to be a Vietnamese, who prefers a place because it is more "democratic"?

You do know that Vietnam is communist right? :rofl:
 
.
Like I said, atleast not last HK used to have democrat more than in Mainland. If you were HKnese, you will know before 1997 how many times HK police lured Chinese came from Mainland. Don't know what happend by now in HK. [You'll probaly don't know if you were young enogh] My company and myself was in Kowloon in 1995 did some business in there.

Hongkong was not a democracy under British rule either,top leader appointed by the british queen.but basically nothing really Changed after 1997.

---------- Post added at 09:55 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:54 AM ----------

OK, botom line is:

Does those cities [HK,SH,Macao] rule by China goverment? Which City rule by China hand be equal more than HK,Shanghai,Macao?

is SH Shanghai?oh,my goD,what exactly do you mean?
 
.
Hongkong was not a democracy under British rule either,top leader appointed by the british queen.but basically nothing really Changed after 1997.

You're right. No Hong Kong person voted for Chris Patten (Fat Pang), Tung Chee Hwa (Dong Jianhua) or the current Donald Tsang.

Chris Patten was appointed by the British, and has often been called a "千古罪人". Tung Chee Hwa and Donald Tsang were appointed indirectly by the Beijing government after the handover.
 
.
Having been in the PRC and many other developing nations including india, there is no comparison, parts of China are already in the first world, and the rest are catching up fast. There has never been anything like it - in the history of mankind, hundreds of millions out of poverty in a matter of a few decades.
 
.
Hongkong was not a democracy under British rule either,top leader appointed by the british queen.but basically nothing really Changed after 1997.

I definitely prefer it after 1997. :tup:

It is unacceptable for a majority Chinese city like Hong Kong to be ruled by a white British expat (Chris Patten), who cannot even speak a word of Chinese.

Of course it is ten thousand times better to have our leader as a fellow Chinese person. Colonialism was a scar on the face of history.
 
.
Hong Kong was built by the hardworking Han Chinese, not the Brits.

If the Brits were deserved to take away the credit, then why they still left many of their former colonies so poor?

Those colonies have far more natural resources than Hong Kong, and they shouldn't become so poor.
 
.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom