China's new leader!

[ChineseTiger1986]

我只知道KMT是给苏联当了狗又给美国当狗，其中分出一部分同时给日本人当狗。
某些果粉还是少读些真相文，读读正儿八经的史书看看国民党到底是怎么生出来的吧。

果粉平时还有些民族气节，但一谈到TG就显得非常的狭隘无知了

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

我只知道KMT是给苏联当了狗又给美国当狗，其中分出一部分同时给日本人当狗。
某些果粉还是少读些真相文，读读正儿八经的史书看看国民党到底是怎么生出来的吧。

还有出卖外蒙的明显是老蒋，这点果粉怎么都是赖不掉的

 

[S10]

国冥党最大问题是从来没有想过自己自立更生，永远想着靠外援。孙大炮靠日本人，蒋光头那废才我就不说了，说出来我都觉得中国人自己脸上无光，至于台巴子，到今天还靠美国日本生存。

 

[oct605032048]

李灯黑 陈谁扁 马蝇狗 。。。

 

[stax]

广东每年的经济增长超过国家平均值，对于一个已经在经济发展前沿的省份来说很不宜，而重庆的经济增长却低于国家平均水平。另外，王立军的背叛对薄极其不利，其实这也不是我想看到的。这才是真正的带路党。汪洋到现在还没有做任何违背中国的事，反而，他正在努力粉碎外国资本家对中国资源和知识产权的垄断。在这个阶段引进外资就是卖国，汪洋想广东一万家外资代工企业垮掉，连温家宝都没这种魄力，而习却想引进更多的外资代工企业吸中国人的血，谁是真正的带路党？

汪洋是从底层走出来的，这种人根本没有卖国的动机，试想，你做了一家公司，是你一辈子的努力和汗水，你愿意卖给巨大的跨国企业吗？但如果你一出生就继承了这家公司，你会对它有如此深的感情吗？政治亦如此，一个从底层奋斗起的人对权利更有敬畏感，是太子党无法理解的一种敬畏。

底层出来又怎么样，单看能力，汪洋不如习和薄。
团派给人的感觉就是内斗厉害，甚至置国家利益于不顾。典型的例子就是任命的铁道部部长"盛返祖"

 

[stax]

南方系代表的就是美国日本和大资本家的利益。
看看网易那些美狗日杂就知道了。
一个个哭爹喊娘要当带路党。

 

[skyknight]

团派就是一群官僚，能力不怎么样，就光知道卡位。

 

[skyknight]

苏联恰恰是那些底层走上来的高级干部弄垮的，解体后的寡头大多是那些底层上来的苏共高级干部。
太子党再烂，这个政权垮了，他们必然被抽筋剥皮挂电线杆
汪洋在重庆和广东的民间风评都不怎么样
王立军事件到底真相如何，还得继续观察。

 

[帅的一匹]

不管是黑猫白猫，抓到老鼠的就是好猫，让我们对习近平的表现拭目以待。我觉得在南海问题上，一定要拿越南开刀！杀鸡儆猴！

 

[帅的一匹]

中国应该做好备战的准备了。现在我们虽然是以妥协作为拖延时间发展的手段，但是我认为不因为了争取和平发展的时间让老美进一步蚕食我们的战略空间。一定要在南海给越南一次深刻的教训！对于现在又很多领导人的子女都在国外生活，本人认为国家交到这些人的手里是绝对不安全的，这本身就显示出他们对中国的前景不看好。因为在他们的潜意识里，在适当的时候投降西方可以作为一种不错选择。

 

[ephone]

It is not really that important for those foreign passport. Other leaders' descendants have foreign passports as well.

The problem is that his extreme methods to sacrifice the masses for his own benefits. To achieve his goals, he won't care about the proper legal procedures. In most cases, his personal decision supersedes all others. If he took power, it will be a Mao who abused power again.

I know for a fact that most of the closest relatives of Bo have French passports, for about 2 decades now... some of them were even born in France.

 

[ephone]

Oh, authoritarian oligarchs with little accountability, sounds like the Fed, Pentagon... most of the US government actually. Wonder how they brainwash their people to chat USA! USA! USA! all the time.

---------- Post added at 04:31 AM ---------- Previous post was at 04:30 AM ----------



Well that settles it then, his Politburo run is probably over.

---------- Post added at 04:33 AM ---------- Previous post was at 04:31 AM ----------



Wang Yang might be soft on crime but that's because his focus is on economic development.

That doesn't mean Wang Yang is exceptionally bad. Every city in China has gang crime, just that Chongqing's got exposed. Guangdong was one of the most violent and dangerous provinces in China, and it's been getting better since Wang Yang took over.

With that big case of corruptions exposed in ChongQing later and apparently the whole police/investigation system there rotten, Wang Yang has nothing to be blamed for???

I do not even understand how ChongQing gets better under Wang Yang's rule???

To consolidate several crime bosses into one called wen qiang??? What a joke. BTW, I do not think Wang Yang knew nothing about Wen Qiang's corruption details while he ruled Chong Qing as well.

 

[RayKalm]

It's a scary thought to have a VERY pro-USA leader of China.

 

[below_freezing]

It is not really that important for those foreign passport. Other leaders' descendants have foreign passports as well.

The problem is that his extreme methods to sacrifice the masses for his own benefits. To achieve his goals, he won't care about the proper legal procedures. In most cases, his personal decision supersedes all others. If he took power, it will be a Mao who abused power again.

Most of those countries are African dictatorships. If you think China is, or should be, an African dictatorship, then I have nothing to say.

---------- Post added at 10:49 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:47 AM ----------

底层出来又怎么样，单看能力，汪洋不如习和薄。
团派给人的感觉就是内斗厉害，甚至置国家利益于不顾。典型的例子就是任命的铁道部部长"盛返祖"

i am on a work computer, cannot type Chinese. national interest is very broad, selling your country to Goldman Sachs is usually detrimental to national interest.

 

[longyi]

It's a scary thought to have a VERY pro-USA leader of China.

In the eyes of the US Congress, whether the new leader of China is pro or neutral to US is immaterial. Of course unless he is a yes-US, toes every US line, which is unlikely. The political atmosphere in Washington now a day is anything with a Chinese name in it smells distrust. It will take good diplomacy and time to mend those differences, if China is so desired.

A pro US Chinese leader dose not necessary mean an anti China leader. China has to be friend of some nations and US is not a bad choice if friendship is being reciprocated.