What's new

China's military bluster camouflages toothless bite

Justin Joseph

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Mar 4, 2010
Messages
2,216
Reaction score
0
China's military bluster camouflages toothless bite


Ben Blanchard - Analysis
BEIJING
Mon Mar 8, 2010 11:06pm EST

BEIJING (Reuters) - Big on spit and polish and parades but short on experience, new technology and force coordination, China's military has far to go before its bite begins to approach its increasingly loud, and for some fearsome, bark.


China has invested billions of dollars in its armed forces and is developing advanced fighters and missiles, considering building its first aircraft carrier and is trying to slim its bloated ranks down to a lean, high-tech military.

The 2010 Defense budget unveiled last week was 7.5 percent higher than last year, a modest rise by China's recent standards, but impressive compared to other big powers.

Those rises have raised alarm in Taiwan, the self-ruled island China claims as its own, the rest of the region, and especially in the United States, the world's only superpower with a military reach that far exceeds China's.

In a report to Congress published last month, the Pentagon said it was concerned by China's missile buildup and increasingly advanced capabilities in the Pacific region.

Yet while China's People's Liberation Army (PLA) looks increasingly fierce on paper, analysts -- and even Chinese army officers -- say it will be a long time before the country has the means to effectively challenge U.S. power, if ever.

"What is their readiness level? How effective are these things they've developed themselves?" said Drew Thompson, of the Nixon Center, a think tank in Washington.

"Is their indigenous technology really working, or does it simply exist like a lot of things in the Chinese system, on paper? I would posit it probably leans more toward the latter."

After a spike in tension that has stoked nationalist Chinese calls for a hard shove back against U.S. influence, some PLA officers are also trying to discourage chest-thumping.

"There's no way China can threaten the United States," Lt. Gen. Li Dianren, a professor at the National Defense University, told Reuters on the sidelines of the annual session of parliament.

"Anyone with even a bit of common sense knows that our capabilities do not come even close to matching those of the U.S. In terms of economics, technology and the military, the gap is huge. How can we threaten them?" he added.

A BIG PARADE

To be sure, China's military is becoming increasingly assertive, as seen by occasional tiffs at sea and in the air, notably in 2001 when a U.S. spy plane made an emergency landing on Hainan island after a collision with a Chinese fighter jet.

Last March, the Pentagon said five Chinese ships harassed the U.S. Navy Ship the Impeccable, an unarmed ocean surveillance vessel, in international waters off Hainan. China says the U.S. ship was carrying out an illegal survey.

PLA showmanship is also grand.

A military parade last October 1 marking 60 years since the founding of the People's Republic of China featured an array of new weapons, all domestically developed.

"China and the United States are rivals. That's a fact," said Liu Mingfu, author of a book calling for China to develop a military so powerful Washington will not dare challenge it.

"In the past, U.S. presidents didn't call China a rival, and Chinese presidents never have. But that's strategic hypocrisy, because each side knows the other is a rival," he said.

Many practical hurdles could hamper Liu's goal.

China is hardly renowned for producing high quality goods, as a series of product safety scandals in recent years has shown.

"If you go to the PLA and they show you some fantastic new missile on display at an air show, yes they have a missile system, but does it work? Does it work repeatedly and does it work in combat conditions?" Thompson said.

"Until you know that for sure you simply assume they've got one heck of an interesting platform that might do us some harm ... but the reality might be far different."

OTHER PROBLEMS

One problem is the U.S. and EU arms embargo against China following the 1989 military crackdown on the pro-democracy Tiananmen protests, and there is little sign they will lift it any time soon.

There's also inexperience.

Unlike the United States, currently engaged in two massive military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, China has not engaged in full battle for three decades.

China's last major confrontation was with Vietnam in 1979, and that was hardly a glorious victory. Chinese forces crossed the border to punish Hanoi for invading its ally Cambodia, but Vietnam's battle-hardened troops gave the Chinese a bloody nose.

China has made some impressive technological advances. The successful missile "kill" of an old satellite in 2007 represented a new level of ability. In January, China successfully tested emerging technology aimed at destroying missiles in mid-air.

Integrating such advances into the country's vast armed forces could be problematic though.

"The (Sichuan) earthquake in 2008 showed their weakness in joint operations," said Lin Chong-Pin, a strategic studies professor at Taipei's Tamkang University.

After the massive quake, Chinese soldiers involved in rescue efforts struggled with shortages and bottlenecks magnified by poor coordination between forces and units.

China's military edge over tech powerhouse Taiwan, a democratic island Beijing has threatened to eventually bring under its control, is growing though.

Even then, not everyone is convinced China could easily overpower Taiwan, despite its advancing weaponry.

"The point is to make the U.S. military stay at a distance," said Hsu Yung-ming, a political science professor at Taipei's Soochow University, referring to China's military modernization.

(Additional reporting by Chris Buckley in Beijing and Ralph Jennings in Taipei; Editing by Benjamin Kang Lim)


China's military bluster camouflages toothless bite | Reuters
 
Frankly speaking I don't worry about the combat capability of PLA, the problem is lack of experience because of 30ys peace and corruption in the army. The battle between China and Vietnam is such a good example, different divisions from all over the China fight with Vietnam one by one, just for training.......
 
Toothless or sabre-toothed, we wont know until we actually meet them in the battlefield. Till then lets hope we don't have to and in the meantime lets shore up our own defenses.
 
PLA has limited capacity to prject power at distance. The only chance to test might be to screw a big fat as in the neighbourhood. Could be fun!
 
it could be so much more than fun....you are really funny, man...

i pray the funny day for you never comes....
 
exactly. we are so weak and helpless, so why all the talk about "china threat"?

after all since we'll never ever match the great and glorious american empi- i mean "free association of states", we need to triple our military budget to even be able to talk about thinking about surpassing the great and glorious gods on the other side of the pacific =)
 
As an Indian would say:

"Yes we are still developing nation, but our progress is very fast. Happy now? We suck."

Lolz, since I see that Indian response to everything Anti-Indian, why not use it the other way around?
 
Whatever said and done, China has successfully managed to keep its enemies at bay. How many countries can do that?

USA is miles ahead of China in defense technology, but fact remains that USA will think several times before messing with China.

The dragon might be toothless, but it still manages to invoke fear.
 
PLA needs a war for training,no matter who is the enemy~

I strongly support you view, without participating in war, a large army like PLA becomes inactive. Military drills don't help much. An army needs coordinating skills between various wings. For example attacking a strong enemy position in a coordinated ferocious manner is something that neither training nor drill can teach. Killing an enemy in a ruthless ferocious manner cannot also be learnt from drills where there is no bloodshed. US marines are experienced with such bloodshed and thats why its easy for them to mercilessly destroy enemies. Also US marines know how to attack enemies and eliminate them within a limited time or how to survive unexpected sudden enemy attacks. If PLA does not take part in real pitched battles, then one day PLA will become a waxed army. High techs don't give you the bravery that you can learn from real battles. A soldier must always be ready to achieve martyrdom and that makes some one a soldier. A soldier's main aim is to kill the enemy at any cost. Thats his primary duty. Also a real battle will let PLA know whether there is any flaw in their equipments and also new strategies.
 
Back
Top Bottom