What's new

China's Inner Mongolia 'under heavy security'

.
So colonialism and imperialism is modern.

What was it before being modern.

Barbarian uncivilised pillage, loot and rape to include rape of the land?

It might be a little unfair (to them) to just simply say the nomadic tribes are barbarians.

Their barbarian behaviors are largely attribute to their values and cultures rooted from their nomadic daily life. All the wealth, sheep, horses slaves and women (were also seen as a kind of wealth) belongs to the strongest person of the tribe, and sister-in-law (they may don't have such a thing like law) or even mother belongs to the younger brother or son after the Xiongnu's Khan died.

What can you expect them to do after they once got the chance to break the Wall and find themselves among a wealthy and prosperous land they had never been to? What they did is just the same as what the the Mughals or other nomadic Khans who crossed the Hindu Kush and did to you people in the past thousands years.
 
.
To finish the endless harass of the nomads and have peace, courageous emperors had to made right but difficult decisions to fight back to the grasslands and tried make the nomads submit themselves to the dynasty and harass no more.

---------- Post added at 06:13 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:12 PM ----------

It is just a different strategy to build the Great Wall.
 
.
To finish the endless harass of the nomads and have peace, courageous emperors had to made right but difficult decisions to fight back to the grasslands and tried make the nomads submit themselves to the dynasty and harass no more.

---------- Post added at 06:13 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:12 PM ----------

It is just a different strategy to build the Great Wall.

Exactly!!! :china:
 
.
Oh I'm sure that neither the emperor of China nor the Khan's of Xiongnu (about 300 BC to 200 AD) or the Xianbei (about 300 to 600 AD) or the Turks (700 to 900 AD) or the Mongols (about 1200 AD) have any chance to even notice that there is a tiny tribe called isareal who live the corner of the world.
 
.
Guess who?




Han is not a language.

It is a race.

You lose your ethnic identity, when the demographic pattern is changed. And more so, when in your own land you become a minority. Inner Mongolia has 80% Han and 20% Mongolian.

Are you a Chinese of Malaysia. It appears so.

Guess why Mahatir brought in the Bhumiputra stuff? They were getting professionally and economically swamped!! And guess by who?

And why do the Chinese of Malaysia go to Australia for education? Three guesses!



Now, now, guess who is bullshitting!

Have you read of the Chinese white paper, so to say, on 100 Years of National Shame?

Apparently, you have not. You have much reading to do, so don't waste time!

As they say, Time and Tide waits for none!!

You can only have 'National Shame' if you've had a glorious past. Unlike India with your '300 years of National Glory' being civilized and dominated by a couple thousand Britishers. That was India's Golden Age.

:cheers:
 
.
You can only have 'National Shame' if you've had a glorious past. Unlike India with your '300 years of National Glory' being civilized and dominated by a couple thousand Britishers. That was India's Golden Age.

:cheers:
When you've been subjugated by Islam for 800 years and then enslaved by the British for another 200 years, you no longer have any memories of the long-dead Hindu kingdoms where your ancestry came from. Instead, you desperately try to pretend to be British, but know deep down in your heart that you will always be a subservient class to them. Look at the Commonwealth Games in Delhi... India tried to show off but the Anglo-Saxons found it repulsive.

But Indians look on the bright side of everything. Don't call it self-delusion. It's all they got.
 
.
WEll I suppose PRC did not exist till 1950 as well then ey?

PRC may not have existed untill then but the country 'China' does. Unlike India eh?

And also not a good thing to have a 'century of humiliation' by British and Japanese forces. Small number of Japanese Samurais have conquered China time and again including Manchu in WWII. Well I guess it's 'Millennia of humiliation'. :)


It is better than having a collection of warring states until founded by the British colonizers who united the Indians as an efficient work force for the Brits, serving them and doing their deeds. Even caring about the 'British Empire and Commonwealth Games' as if it was proud to be enslaved.
By the way care to link your sources for the small number of samurai's who conquered China? I think you are in dire need of an education kiddo :lol:
 
.
WEll I suppose PRC did not exist till 1950 as well then ey?
And also not a good thing to have a 'century of humiliation' by British and Japanese forces. Small number of Japanese Samurais have conquered China time and again including Manchu in WWII. Well I guess it's 'Millennia of humiliation'. :)

How many British did India kill, and did India win the war against Britain?
How many Japanese did China kill, and did China win the war against Japan?

From what I recall 1 million Japanese soldiers died in China out of 3 million but only 2000 British conquered all of India.
 
.
again an chinese internal affair attracts some india 'chinese history experts' to ruine it!
 
.
It does matter.

Nope it does not matter since Inner Mongolia is a part of China.

It should tell you not to ride the high horse or spread psychobabble.

Does India have a horse that high to ride on? I pity you who has non and the only thing they have is to spread psychobabble whilst walking on foot. :coffee:

Imperialist and colonialist that is what China is.

I wonder why we allowed the Brits to become the imperial master of India when we could have done the same and have you guys show us your unreserved eternal love by hosting 'The Chinese Imperial Games' once every four yearly.

The hypocrisy is that China take over an area and change the demography and then claim that the people who are of that area are merely minority, when they refuse to accept themselves being converted to Han!

What hypocrisy is there when China is simply modernizing it's 'own' states and lands? Funny one who has little to no significance to China grew up to have so much emotional attachments with its neighbor. I suggest you worry more about great India and its billion independent Hindu's instead. A country a third of China's size with comparable total population to be more problematic than Albert Einsteins personal notebook can surely find something better to do with their time. A country that changes the demography by treating the poor and the helpless to starvation, stealing their annual aids, killing rural farmers with GM seeds (and the list goes on) are nothing to be proud about. Of course it is easier to deflect the attention away by simply 'nitpicking' on its neighbors issues. I wonder how many Indians actually walk around with blinkers on and is totally oblivious of its obnoxious surroundings like yourself. ;)

Outright arrogance to expect Muslims of Xinjiang or Buddhists of Tibet to become Hans

Coming from a person who lives in a country that trained, supported terrorists, host and harbors separatists against its neighbors? Hardly surprising and very arrogant indeed. :rolleyes:
 
.
You can only have 'National Shame' if you've had a glorious past. Unlike India with your '300 years of National Glory' being civilized and dominated by a couple thousand Britishers. That was India's Golden Age.

:cheers:

Not this again! Aren't you guys taught about the Boxer Rebellion, Opium wars and the Unequal treaties in History? If you guys weren't dominated by the British then why they were the buying stuff from you and paying you in Opium. They were effectively ruling over China! If they wanted they could have taken over China too like they did with India, there was nothing stopping them.

Asians (all of us, even the Japanese) got outsmarted by the Europeans and the Americans, and thats that.
 
.
Most protestors when Han, not Mongols.
So keep one dreaming that China's gonna fall apart along ethnic lines.
 
.
I don't see why would Mangolians complains both the girls were beautiful , in picture I see no difference every one loves China equally just few bad apples but China is on the case to fix it
 
.
You can only have 'National Shame' if you've had a glorious past. Unlike India with your '300 years of National Glory' being civilized and dominated by a couple thousand Britishers. That was India's Golden Age.

:cheers:

You can have 'National Shame' only when you fudge history to pretend you have shame, since the so called glory is all about shame!

When you've been subjugated by Islam for 800 years and then enslaved by the British for another 200 years, you no longer have any memories of the long-dead Hindu kingdoms where your ancestry came from. Instead, you desperately try to pretend to be British, but know deep down in your heart that you will always be a subservient class to them. Look at the Commonwealth Games in Delhi... India tried to show off but the Anglo-Saxons found it repulsive.

But Indians look on the bright side of everything. Don't call it self-delusion. It's all they got.

We assimilate the good of everyone who came and went or stayed behind and contributed. We have don't find being stupidly arrogant is a manner of good form. And we have no hangups of inventing shame so as to ensure that there is no internal rebellion. It is the greatness of our historical churn that makes us strong inspite of not having to force culture, language etc on people. That is why there are so many different people, cultures, languages, religions etc and still we remain one and no fudging a national glory and national shame is required to unite us.

We do have a vast history of Hindu, Buddhist, Mughul, British. India is a churn of various culture and people and we are One and therefore, once again, there is no National Shame fudged up story like China to build unity.

Jealous that we know English and you are struggling?

Want me to attached some Chinese billboards that make a joke of Chinese attempt at English?

Nope it does not matter since Inner Mongolia is a part of China.

It matters everywhere in the world except China.

Hans North of the Yellow River, through devious and dubious means, have forced the people not of the Yellow River to accept that they are Hans. Therefore, to the Chinese it does not matter. It is indeed a National Shame that people have been made to forget their past and brainwashed to believe that they are Hans!! Huge shame indeed. Reminds me of the book, Animal Farm!

Wus are Hans, right?

Does India have a horse that high to ride on? I pity you who has non and the only thing they have is to spread psychobabble whilst walking on foot. :coffee:

We have some from China.

What are you babbling about in any case and frothing at the bit?

I wonder why we allowed the Brits to become the imperial master of India when we could have done the same and have you guys show us your unreserved eternal love by hosting 'The Chinese Imperial Games' once every four yearly.

Heard of the song 'High Hopes'?

Another thing is that you were in pleasant pink clouds at your Opium dens and so you were too decadent to realise things that were happening around. That's why.

BTW, get your GK updated. You are hugely lacking in it.

The Commonwealth is not an extension of Imperial power. It is an economic and cultural organisation. Bone up.

What hypocrisy is there when China is simply modernizing it's 'own' states and lands? Funny one who has little to no significance to China grew up to have so much emotional attachments with its neighbor. I suggest you worry more about great India and its billion independent Hindu's instead. A country a third of China's size with comparable total population to be more problematic than Albert Einsteins personal notebook can surely find something better to do with their time. A country that changes the demography by treating the poor and the helpless to starvation, stealing their annual aids, killing rural farmers with GM seeds (and the list goes on) are nothing to be proud about. Of course it is easier to deflect the attention away by simply 'nitpicking' on its neighbors issues. I wonder how many Indians actually walk around with blinkers on and is totally oblivious of its obnoxious surroundings like yourself. ;)

India is not Hindu, old boy, unlike China which claims to be Han, when it is not. It is a pot-pourri forced into deluding that they are all Han!!

Everyone in India is allowed to maintain their own religion, language, culture etc and no one group (like the Hans in China) can allow their imperialistic ideas to humiliate others into submission.

A country that changes the demography by treating the poor and the helpless to starvation, stealing their annual aids, killing rural farmers with GM seeds (and the list goes on) are nothing to be proud about. Of course it is easier to deflect the attention away by simply 'nitpicking' on its neighbors issues. I wonder how many Indians actually walk around with blinkers on and is totally oblivious of its obnoxious surroundings like yourself.

Does indicate why you all are jealous that we know English.

It is so apparent that you all are clueless about English.

Check up what is demography?

Starvation, GM seeds etc are not demography nor change in demography.

Stealing non Han lands and flooding it with Hans and making the locals a minority is changing of demography.

What hogwash you chaps can churn up that has no connection in meaning to the words that you use.

This is not Communist China that anything churned out is the Gospel Truth!!

Coming from a person who lives in a country that trained, supported terrorists, host and harbors separatists against its neighbors? Hardly surprising and very arrogant indeed. :rolleyes:

Talking about China?

You are right!

Most protestors when Han, not Mongols.
So keep one dreaming that China's gonna fall apart along ethnic lines.

Check again the youtube.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom