China's Huawei offers to share source code

[Jade]

Japan's GDP will be surpassed within the year. But a simple problem for India is, it does not even have starvation solved. Import of technology means you don't even understand it. Look at all the crashed Mig-21s.

My question is why Japan with so little land mass and less resources has more GDP than China. Then automatically you will get the answer for Indian GDP Vs South Korean GDP.

At least Importing is not copying. I think Chengdu J-10 is a copied Su-27,or at least thats' what reports say

 

[Merilion]

My question is why Japan with so little land mass and less resources has more GDP than China. Then automatically you will get the answer for Indian GDP Vs South Korean GDP.

At least Importing is not copying. I think Chengdu J-10 is a copied Su-27,or at least thats' what reports say

stupidity has no limit. you have zero knowledge on China, pls STFU.

 

[Merilion]

Analyst Angle: BWA in India: WiMAX, TD-LTE and things in the rearview mirror
Flap over security concerns could hobble Huawei, ZTE growth in India
May 5 2010 - 6:59 pm ET | By Shiv K. Bakhshi, Ph. D. | RCR Wireless News

excerpts from the article:

"Flap over Chinese vendors

First, some background: Citing security concerns, India has blocked imports of telecom equipment from Chinese vendors for an indefinite period. While no formal ban has been imposed, Indian operators have been advised to seek security clearance for the equipment they may be procuring for their network operations.

The security clearance requirement is an existing licensing condition that the government has invoked to throttle the import of Chinese equipment into the country.

India is the second-largest market outside China for both Huawei and ZTE and the Chinese vendors are, understandably, scrambling to gain clarity and allay the government's security concerns. The implications of the ban on existing infrastructure contracts are unclear, except that network deployment plans of some operators are being thrown out of whack.

Will hurt domestic industry too

Sources in government and industry suggest that the flap over security might persist for several months. If that happens, it would effectively hobble Huawei's and ZTE's growth opportunities in India, since both Huawei and ZTE might get excluded from the first round of contracts awarded for 3G and BWA. Western vendors would stand to gain, by contrast.

The ban on Chinese telecom infrastructure imports may, actually, hurt the entire Indian industry. The reduction in competition, especially elimination of aggressive competitors from the equation, may raise the bill for all telcos. While the large incumbent operators may still be able to extract favorable terms from the remaining vendors, if only because of historical relationships, the smaller operators are sure to see their bills rise.

But beyond this, the ban on Chinese vendors might also adversely affect WIMAX prospects in India. The Chinese vendors, much more than their major western counterparts, seemed inclined to pursue WiMAX contracts. In addition to providing the technology, they would likely have offered viable financing terms to help new WiMAX players roll out the networks.

If these vendors are forced to sit out the round of infrastructure contracts that are likely to follow the current auctions, WiMAX may have lost strong allies that could have helped their cause in India. There is always Samsung and the smaller infrastructure vendors, of course. "

Analyst Angle: BWA in India: WiMAX, TD-LTE and things in the rearview mirror - RCR Wireless News

 

[Jade]

stupidity has no limit. you have zero knowledge on China, pls STFU.

My mistake; copied F 16. Happy

 

[Martian2]

Indians don't really want to pay 50% more for their telecoms gear. In brinkmanship, to win, you can't blink when India pushes you to the edge.

NEW DELHI: The home ministry has indicated that it may allow Chinese telecom equipment makers to supply ware that has been duly certified by British Telecom.

British Telecom has the capability to accord security certification to Chinese telecom hardware before it is exported.

When ZTE representatives met home secretary G K Pillai here last week to air their grievances regarding security concerns that have blocked imports of their wares here, they cited the equipment’s security certification by the reputed British Telecom to argue that it would be safe for India as well.

According to sources in MHA, the chief executive officer of ZTE insisted that the equipment they were looking to supply in India carried the certification of British Telecom.

The home secretary then sought clarifications on what sort of certification was being done by British Telecom on equipment manufactured by ZTE, and whether the same certified equipment would be sold in the Indian market.

“If British Telecom has already certified it to be secure, we can well conclude that it is safe for the Indian market as well as there is no way UK would let in any Chinese equipment with malware or spyware,” a senior MHA official told ET.

ZTE has sought two weeks to come back to MHA with clarifications sought by the home secretary. Once the ministry is satisfied with the authenticity of the certification from British Telecom and its applicability to the equipment for sale here, senior officials said they saw no reason to block out ZTE from the Indian market.

Incidentally, the same logic would apply to other Chinese major, Huawei Technologies, battling security concerns from Indian agencies. Provided Huawei is able to produce due certification for its equipment from a reputed foreign player, MHA is willing to allow its equipment to be sold here after checking out the authenticity and reliability of the certification.

The telecom department as well as service providers are pressing MHA not to keep out Chinese telcos as the only alternative supplier of telecom equipment, Alcatel, has a very limited capacity and cannot take care of demands of the Indian market. Also, Chinese equipment is far cheaper.

Both Huawei and ZTE’s expansion plans in India are stuck due to security concerns raised by R&AW and Intelligence Bureau regarding their alleged links with the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA). Huawei has however rubbished such suspicions and maintains that it is “absolutely owned by our employees and no government agency or other organisations have ownership in our operations.”

Incidentally, even as government is willing to clear Chinese telecom equipment certified by British Telecom, it is also in the process of setting up a domestic regulator to provide security certification at different stages for equipment brought to India by both the public and private sectors.

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com...ified-Huawei-ZTE-gear/articleshow/5951407.cms

 

[username]

self delete

 

[username]

self delete