China's H-6K bombers fly beyond the First Island Chain

[AndrewJin]

B52 has bigger load and longer range than H6K..
The major function of H6K will be firing cruise missile and anti-ship missile.
While B52 has more function like conventional bombing but not anti-ship.




The purpose of B2 is to hunt USSR ICBM launcher within USSR territory without fighter escort ...
If you are only to fire long distance cruise missiles outside air defense zone, B52 may be better as it can carry more...




Be noted that strategic of China is not military competition with US and its allies.
USSR has proven it is wrong.
China is now preparing for minimum defense power against potential US invasion.
If China has the capacity to block US out of first island chain, that is pretty enough.
Globally China has no interest nor capacity to challenge US on miltary.
We welcome US to be the 'world police' while we prefer to be a 'free rider'.

Indeed, China is not hijacked by Military-Industrial Complex, unlike US.
It is not Americans who want a war but their government's bribery provider.

 

[gambit]

Em we are also developing a bomber like B-2, for the level of technology of B-2, a old plane, that is not hard for us.

Of course not hard. But by the time a Chinese version of the B-2 is in production, we will have something far better. By the way, we already know how to defeat 'stealth'. That mean the Chinese version of the B-2 will be obsolete by the time it take its first test flight.

 

[XiaoYaoZi Backup]

Of course not hard. But by the time a Chinese version of the B-2 is in production, we will have something far better. By the way, we already know how to defeat 'stealth'. That mean the Chinese version of the B-2 will be obsolete by the time it take its first test flight.

Beating little Vietnam is always enough

 

[steelseries779]

They should fly over JP islands.

Or drop something.

 

[ebony&ivory]

PLAAF stealth bomber far exceeds B-2. It travels as fast as SR-71 while remaining stealthy.

 

[Beidou2020]

Of course not hard. But by the time a Chinese version of the B-2 is in production, we will have something far better. By the way, we already know how to defeat 'stealth'. That mean the Chinese version of the B-2 will be obsolete by the time it take its first test flight.

Pretty much everyone knows how to defeat 'stealth'. Just ask Serbia.

 

[gambit]

Pretty much everyone knows how to defeat 'stealth'. Just ask Serbia.

We did. And the answer made US laugh so hard, the Serbians got so embarrassed they pretty much STFU all these yrs.

PLAAF stealth bomber far exceeds B-2. It travels as fast as SR-71 while remaining stealthy.

Am sure it does...In video games.

 

[Beidou2020]

We did. And the answer made US laugh so hard, the Serbians got so embarrassed they pretty much STFU all these yrs.


Am sure it does...In video games.

Its 'stealth' in America, it ain't 'stealth' in Serbia

 

[gambit]

Its 'stealth' in America, it ain't 'stealth' in Serbia

Of course the F-117 and the B-2 were 'stealthy' over Serbia. We only lost one jet. When we asked Serbia why they managed to shoot down only one, they turned tail and ran.

 

[Beidou2020]

Of course the F-117 and the B-2 were 'stealthy' over Serbia. We only lost one jet. When we asked Serbia why they managed to shoot down only one, they turned tail and ran.

One is enough to show how 'stealthy' American planes truly are

The mighty American 'stealth' planes couldn't even evade superpower Serbian air defences, what chance does it have of evading weaklings like Russia and China.

Ran? you mean like how the US military ran away from North Korea after China entered the war?

 

[gambit]

One is enough to show how 'stealthy' American planes truly are

One lost out of hundreds of sorties ? Far better record than whatever your China have. But of course, China lost no 'stealth' jets because China have none.

The mighty American 'stealth' planes couldn't even evade superpower Serbian air defences, what chance does it have of evading weaklings like Russia and China.

Pick a fight against US and find out -- the hard way. So far, the only way PLAAF pilots know how to fight is ramming -- Hainan Incident.

Ran? you mean like how the US military ran away from North Korea after China entered the war?

More like China ran away from South Korea.

 

[XiaoYaoZi Backup]

One lost out of hundreds of sorties ? Far better record than whatever your China have. But of course, China lost no 'stealth' jets because China have none.


Pick a fight against US and find out -- the hard way. So far, the only way PLAAF pilots know how to fight is ramming -- Hainan Incident.


More like China ran away from South Korea.

Knowing how to beat little Vietnam is always enough.

 

[xunzi]

Of course not hard. But by the time a Chinese version of the B-2 is in production, we will have something far better. By the way, we already know how to defeat 'stealth'. That mean the Chinese version of the B-2 will be obsolete by the time it take its first test flight.

My friend, you have a very big mouth. If you are not talking, nobody says you are deaf. Big and loud mouth is always embarrassing. LOL

 

[Beidou2020]

One lost out of hundreds of sorties ? Far better record than whatever your China have. But of course, China lost no 'stealth' jets because China have none.


Pick a fight against US and find out -- the hard way. So far, the only way PLAAF pilots know how to fight is ramming -- Hainan Incident.


More like China ran away from South Korea.

One is more than enough to show the true capabilities of American 'stealth' planes.

China already picked a fight against the US in the Korean war when China was at its weakest and US at its absolute peak and found out that the all mighty US military isn't as invisible as the American propaganda tells you to believe.

Lets see who ran away. Before China entered the war, the US military was at the China-NK border, after the war finished, the US military was kicked out of NK.
Who had the net gain of territory? China!
Who had the net loss of territory? USA!

And this was when China was at its weakest and US at its best and with the back up of multiple allies.

America sure did find out the hard way in the Korean war didn't it.... Sherminator?

 

[gambit]

One is more than enough to show the true capabilities of American 'stealth' planes.

Yeah...Which was awesome...!!! Hundreds of 'stealth' sorties and only one lost. Your PLA leadership got embarrassed at how wrong they were about US. By your childish reasoning, if the loss of one F-117 is so terrible, then why is your PLA reformed to match US by using our standards in everything, down to the uniforms, eh ?

China already picked a fight against the US in the Korean war when China was at its weakest and US at its absolute peak and found out that the all mighty US military isn't as invisible as the American propaganda tells you to believe.

Lets see who ran away. Before China entered the war, the US military was at the China-NK border, after the war finished, the US military was kicked out of NK.
Who had the net gain of territory? China!
Who had the net loss of territory? USA!

And this was when China was at its weakest and US at its best and with the back up of multiple allies.

America sure did find out the hard way in the Korean war didn't it.... Sherminator?

Then it looks like your PLA had a drastic decline since it got whupped by the Vietnamese on the ground and when the PLAAF tried to engage an American aircraft, a lumbering four engine prop jobber, the pilot lost control and collided with the American aircraft.