'China's full membership will provide SAARC extra bargaining power'

[SamranAli]

China, for starters, is not in South Asia.


Though Tibet is.

Post of the day.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

Sorry China..you are not welcomed in SAARC...India will never let you enter in South Asia...

We are already there.

As your own media cries about every few days, with their "string of pearls" nonsense.

 

[SamranAli]

SAARC is total failure,. May be new members can make it active.,

 

[45'22']

We are already there.

As your own media cries about every few days, with their "string of pearls" nonsense.

please care to read the post,he was talking about ur membership in SAARC,regarding ur presence in south asia we are also there in south china sea

 

[SamranAli]

Our politicians aren't as stupid as Pakistani politicians.

that is why your trade deficit with china increasing with everyday is passed.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

please care to read the post,he was talking about ur membership in SAARC,regarding ur presence in south asia we are also there in south china sea

Yet we will still get a backdoor FTA with India (by means of the SCO) anyway.

If you thought India was already swamped with Chinese exports, then wait and see what happens after India gets their SCO application approved.

 

[Vinod2070]

No chance of it happening.

China is a distant country, not a neighbor.

Just the temporary occupation of some "buffer regions" doesn't make it a neighbor or South Asian.

 

[Lankan Ranger]

SAARC +3 possible similar to ASEAN +3

+3 – China, Japan & South Korea.

Currently no new full members allowed due to some issues.

For past 3 years Iran trying to enter as a full member but not allowed.

First SAARC members should fix the problems regarding South Asian Free Trading Agreement (SAFTA).

 

[asad71]

1.SAARC was our Gen Zia's vision to gradually bring the peoples of SA closer for mutual prosperity and peace. However, India has been sabotaging all positive programs of this organization from inception using the criterion that requires unilateral decision for everything. SAARC is now a regular picnic organization for political and bureaucratic leaders who earn TA , DA as well.

2. To make SAARC workable any of the fol two options may be adopted:

a. Have a SAARC Minus One. That is, have a SAARC without India and invite others like Iran, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia and PRC to join.
b. But at first try to keep the presnt SAARC with new members like China, Iran, Thailand, Malaysia and Indonesia.

 

[oct605032048]

that is why your trade deficit with china increasing with everyday is passed.

People will benefit from free trade in the long run. Despite internal conflicts and floods, Pakistan's export to China increased 250% in the recent two years.

 

[Vinod2070]

1.SAARC was our Gen Zia's vision to gradually bring the peoples of SA closer for mutual prosperity and peace. However, India has been sabotaging all positive programs of this organization from inception using the criterion that requires unilateral decision for everything. SAARC is now a regular picnic organization for political and bureaucratic leaders who earn TA , DA as well.

2. To make SAARC workable any of the fol two options may be adopted:

a. Have a SAARC Minus One. That is, have a SAARC without India and invite others like Iran, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia and PRC to join.
b. But at first try to keep the presnt SAARC with new members like China, Iran, Thailand, Malaysia and Indonesia.

Wrong flags?

BTW, India is more than 80% of SAARC's population and 85% economy.

Without India, there is no SAARC.

In fact, India is SAARC.

 

[oct605032048]

No chance of it happening.

China is a distant country, not a neighbor.

Just the temporary occupation of some "buffer regions" doesn't make it a neighbor or South Asian.

India become India today only after the British India Company's 300 years rule.

We hold our frontier lands for far more time than the British Company had India.

Wrong flags?

BTW, India is more than 80% of SAARC's population and 85% economy.

Without India, there is no SAARC.

In fact, India is SAARC.

If so, India should go home and play with yourself.

 

[Vinod2070]

India become India today only after the British India Company's 300 years rule.

Try reading a little more than the little red book for history.

We hold our frontier lands for far more time than the British Company had India.

You mean the Mongols and Manchus and Japanese rule over you Hans?

Cooked or uncooked?

Or semi cooked!

If so, India should go home and play with yourself.

We will do it.

After first pushing the Hans back across the outer wall.

 

[SamranAli]

agree SAARC minus india will work.

 

[oct605032048]

Mongols or Manchus are Chinese. They picked up Han language, characters, classics, philosophies and moral values. And they believe that they are Chinese instead of barbarians.

What about the Mughals before your British master? Do they think themselves to be Indian? Did any Vice King of India make Hindu to be the first official language?