China's drive for military supremacy: Beijing's armoury of weapons and the terrifying missiles so high-tech that they are almost impossible to stop

[siegecrossbow]

hahaha it is just a republic day demo show unlike those fake missiles that you chinkus call readily deployed ....

Indians on PDF and on defence research both are on work .....unlike paxtani people claims all chinese weapons as their own..

haha says a typical beggar who sources all weapons from their birthplace CHINa and a big 0 indigenious weapon ....
A BIGGGGG ZEROOOO

Apparently you still don’t understand the concept of a decoy even when I spoon feed you with a link.

Please do enlighten me what India wanted to demo by blowing up cardboard on Republic Day. Iran gets a lot of crap for attacking a “fake aircraft carrier”, but at least it was made of concrete and steel and superficially resembles a carrier. Your plywood tank looks like something a ten year old cobbled together for a school project.

 

[Han Patriot]

'I have convinced myself that my weapons are high tech and difficult to stop'

You mean Arjunk or LCA? Daily mail is now a Chinese paper it seems.

 

[Goritoes]

anyone who questions the Weapons made by China, gladly buy a Chinese-made weapon and put it on your head, and pull the trigger, China product doesn't work, right? y'all know for sure then
A weapon system works what is suppose to do, it designed to do its job, but countermeasures are produced to overcome the system doesn't make the system obsolete, and it doesn't matter if China is making it, or Russia or the USA, every Military or companies that are producing such systems use top of the notch Technology for their country. Even the USA has acknowledged on many occasions about the rising Chinese military and how fast they are catching up, and if their progress is making Americans ( Generals ) concerns then Indians should just shut up about Chinese made system, they are trying to build a 4th Gen fighter with the help of many countries and yet still unable to.

 

[beijingwalker]

why pa kis tan is still not named as chinese province bcs all the time **** people talks and chest thumps about their father china's achivements...

But why you are here talking and chest thumping about your father US?

 

[siegecrossbow]

that is not for actual deployment rather than a show like your shhitty missiles in fake cardboard canisters

why pa kis tan is still not named as chinese province bcs all the time **** people talks and chest thumps about their father china's achivements...

What kind of show is it when you rig timed fire works to blow up cardboard tanks? Is it a show for mentally challenged children? Even Toho makes better models for the 50s version of Godzilla movies. Do you not admit this?

Then again, they type of people entertained by this type of “show” probably doesn’t understand the purpose of how military decoys could fool satellite and aerial surveillance, not that I expect a dummy like you to know how to research.

Also the military decoy shown in your screen cap is a inflatable decoy, not cheap *** cardboard or plywood like that shitty tank used in your parade demo.

 

[Saudang]

There are way more than 5000 villages in China, and US arsenal will not be enough to any much damage major industrial centres.

More than a half of US warheads on standby are 100kt w76 on Ohios, 20 missiles, and 80 heads per boat. Certainly less than half of Ohios on raid are in Pacific, and 4 to 2 are nearly always in repair, and maintanance.

US plan is to have 2 raids per boat per year. And we know that 8 Ohio's are having port in Bangor, unless US really hates us so much to circumnavigate more Ohios from another coast in secret.

They can attack 160 cities at maximum, spreading 4 warheads over a maximum of 20-25km in a first strike scenario.

More realistically, only 4 to 6 of Bangor's Ohios are on the raid, and at least some of them will not fire because they are too up north, and they are afraid of triggering Russians.

Only full salvo of Ohios + followup from the mainland + land operation can genuinely threaten China's existence as a state.

In such scenario, Russia will not lose such a golden opportunity for as long as somebody like Putin would be in power there.

The point I am making is - the biggest deterrent for either china or US is their respective abilities to hit each other back. in that context, US still have much superior ability to punish china away from its home coast lines. China has done tremendously well to build up a great Navy, but what most missed out in the number comparison is the fact that 80+ of its ships are small corvettes and another 100 are small coastal missile gun boats. these are useful for costal defense but not open water power projections ..

As of now, China has very limited ability to project power beyond its coast lines, and in a hypothetical war with the US, the USN can simple operate out of Chinese defense lines and still choke china..

 

[beijingwalker]

As of now, China has very limited ability to project power beyond its coast lines, and in a hypothetical war with the US, the USN can simple operate out of Chinese defense lines and still choke china..

They didn't choke China during the past 70 years when China was much weaker, what makes you think US will do it now? No one can choke China cause doing so means suicide to their own economy and Biden now is adopting a more conciliatory appraoch to China. what India wishes won't come true.

 

[Saudang]

They didn't choke China during the past 70 years when China was much weaker, what makes you think US will do it now? No one can choke China cause doing so means suicide to their own economy and Biden now is adopting a more conciliatory appraoch to China. what India wishes won't come true.

agree, not in normal circumstance, but we are talking about hypothetical war between China and US and the possibilities in that context

I agree. According to your statistic, let's just say that F-16 is half as effective as F-15. That means just 5 Pakistani F-16s can shoot down the entire Indian Air Force, since it is All American (R).

dude, where did the Indian AF refence come from ?

By simplification of the same logic a sqrdn of F16 or F15 will be enough for the US to finish off the PLAAF, as all the F-16 or F15 success were against Russian origin weapons

 

[Saudang]

Australian??? Not for me genius. You can take your "speaking" and shove it up where the sun doesn't shine.

@The Eagle @waz

your attention needed for this comment

 

[FairAndUnbiased]

The point I am making is - the biggest deterrent for either china or US is their respective abilities to hit each other back. in that context, US still have much superior ability to punish china away from its home coast lines. China has done tremendously well to build up a great Navy, but what most missed out in the number comparison is the fact that 80+ of its ships are small corvettes and another 100 are small coastal missile gun boats. these are useful for costal defense but not open water power projections ..

As of now, China has very limited ability to project power beyond its coast lines, and in a hypothetical war with the US, the USN can simple operate out of Chinese defense lines and still choke china..

China has more and better carriers, destroyers and frigates than any country in the world other than USN by far. Just as a comparison:

Indian Navy destroyers: 3 AESA/VLS destroyers + 7 regular destroyers. Kolkata class only has 48 VLS cells, 144 VLS cells total.

Indian Navy frigates: 9 VLS frigates + 4 regular frigates. Each VLS frigate only has 16 VLS cells.

PLAN destroyers: 32 AESA/VLS destroyers + 5 regular destroyers. 8x055 has 112 VLS cells each, 20x052C/D has 64 VLS cells, 4x 052B/051C has 48 VLS cells each. This represents 2000+ VLS cells.

PLAN frigates: 30 VLS frigates + 19 regular frigates. Each VLS frigate has 32 VLS cells.

A single battle group of 1x 001/002 carrier, 2x 055, 2x 054A and 2x sub poses an existential threat to India, as that force already represents 3x more firepower than the entire Indian Navy while being only about 10%-20% of PLAN's full strength.

 

[GS Zhou]

that is not for actual deployment rather than a show like your shhitty missiles in fake cardboard canisters

Russia: EXERCISES OF ENGINEER CAMOUFLAGE REGIMENT IN MOSCOW REGION

Russian Army servicemen of the 45th separate engineer camouflage regiment deploy inflatable aircrafts, tanks, during the exercises to enhance the survivability and combat ability of troops.

 

[Saudang]

China has more and better carriers, destroyers and frigates than any country in the world other than USN by far. Just as a comparison:

Indian Navy destroyers: 3 AESA/VLS destroyers + 7 regular destroyers. Kolkata class only has 48 VLS cells, 144 VLS cells total.

Indian Navy frigates: 9 VLS frigates + 4 regular frigates. Each VLS frigate only has 16 VLS cells.

PLAN destroyers: 32 AESA/VLS destroyers + 5 regular destroyers. 8x055 has 112 VLS cells each, 20x052C/D has 64 VLS cells, 4x 052B/051C has 48 VLS cells each. This represents 2000+ VLS cells.

PLAN frigates: 30 VLS frigates + 19 regular frigates. Each VLS frigate has 32 VLS cells.

A single battle group of 1x 001/002 carrier, 2x 055, 2x 054A and 2x sub poses an existential threat to India, as that force already represents 3x more firepower than the entire Indian Navy while being only about 10%-20% of PLAN's full strength.

and where would they fight the Indian Navy? definitely not in SCS, but somewhere in Indian Ocean region right?

forget about the Indian Navy, but Indian land based assets will be more than enough to take care of this Chinese firepower, where they will not have any replenishment ports for sustenance. Even before than, they have to reach their operations area safely bypassing hostile navies. This is where US Navy is generation ahead of anyone

 

[atan651]

China should concentrate its resources on building qualitative and quantitative strategic weaponries capable of destroying its enemies anywhere on the planet.

 

[The Eagle]

This is one of this high tech impossible to stop missiles I think
View attachment 714358

Sending you on vacations earlier given your attitude & posting behaviour so you can learn how to post by browsing the forum during this period. Use of slangs, misspelling, deliberate use of capital/small letters unnecessarily merely to annoy others etc... is not welcome here.

 

[KurtisBrian]

As of now, China has very limited ability to project power beyond its coast lines, and in a hypothetical war with the US, the USN can simple operate out of Chinese defense lines and still choke china..

and if China's upcoming 2 new carriers are oil powered instead of nuclear that also shows the intention to stay close to home.

All makes sense..MOST of the people, women and the best things in the in the world are in China or a stone's throw (short distance) from China so there is no need to go driving around the world.