China will not pick sides in India-Pakistan disputes

[Adam WANG SHANGHAI MEGA]

We dont need China to pick sides, we want China to be on the right side of history. Secondly Pakistan is more than capable to defend it self in face of foreign aggression.

Actually China has picked side since 1962.
Even if there is no territorial dispute between India and China, China will firmly support Pakistan! !

 

[beijingwalker]

PRC never claimed to pick sides during its whole 70 years existence, you really don't know China's standard official lines during the decades.

 

[Baby Leone]

no one even had asked China to take side......happy to see the smiles and some small happy moments for indians in while

 

[beijingwalker]

So are you calling chinese Liars ?

Every government is a liar in making public statement.

 

[Shankranthi]

Lol wtf there is no truth and lie only interests in international politics.

lol.... of course your words matter when dealing in international politics. Its the foundation for building trust among nations.

But its refreshing to hear a pakistani admit that their word means nothing. We agree.

Every government is a liar in making public statement.

Not every govt. Public statements are statements of intent.

You speak for the chinese govt. when you call them liars. Again, I agree with your assessment.

PRC never claimed to pick sides during its whole 70 years existence, you really don't know China's standard official lines during the decades.

lol. I do, maybe you don't ?

Vietnam, USSR, US, korea etc. ..... you have always picked sides and switched sides.

 

[darksider]

lol.... of course your words matter when dealing in international politics. Its the foundation for building trust among nations.

But its refreshing to hear a pakistani admit that their world means nothing. We agree.



Not every govt. Public statements are statements of intent.

You speak for the chinese govt. when you call them liars. Again, I agree with your assessment.



lol. I do, maybe you don't ?

Vietnam, USSR, US, korea etc. ..... you have always picked sides and switched sides.

Hope you guys will stay on Indus water treaty just to prove that you can stand on your words.because what i am hearing from india that they dont care any treaty.
An other fine example of standing for words is your cricket board who withdraw after promise to play with Pakistan.
So dont play with me ethics ethics.i know how good are indians on ethics.

 

[Shankranthi]

Hope you guys will stay on Indus water treaty just to prove that you can stand on your words.because what i am hearing from india that they dont care any treaty.
An other fine example of standing for words is your cricket board who withdraw after promise to play with Pakistan.
So dont play with me ethics ethics.i know how good are indians on ethics.

I think the Indus water treaty will be abrogated and a new one will be signed in the future.

One that assures transit to afghanistan and beyond via pakistan in exchange for uninterrupted water supply.

Two treaties that are interlinked so that breach of one assures the abrogation of the second.

So far you have lost EVERY CASE you have brought on against India on the IWT. I doubt if you even know what ethics mean.

PS: Cricket board is a private board which has nothing to do with GoI.

 

[darksider]

I think the Indus water treaty will be abrogated and a new one will be signed in the future.

One that assures transit to afghanistan and beyond via pakistan in exchange for uninterrupted water supply.

Two treaties that are interlinked so that breach of one assures the abrogation of the second.

So far you have lost EVERY CASE you have brought on against India on the IWT. I doubt if you even know what ethics mean.

PS: Cricket board is a private board which has nothing to do with GoI.

I prove my point there is no truth and lie in international politics only interests.you are quoting me just for sake of argument.you know in your heart its truth.
There are lots of examples around us.
Your cricket board do it because of your gov.

 

[graphican]

Baniya is deceptive coward. They will attack when you think the matter is cold. Scums have no self esteem and expect them to be what they are.

 

[Cash GK]

Straight from the chinese govt. mouth piece.

http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1141569.shtml

China will not pick sides in India-Pakistan disputes
By Li Qingqing Source:Global Times Published: 2019/3/10 19:48:39
35


As the relations between Pakistan and India are at their lowest these days, Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Kong Xuanyou paid a visit to Pakistan on Wednesday, calling the two sides to refrain from taking any actions that could further escalate the situation. Pakistan appreciated China's objective and fair stand and thanked China for its efforts to reduce the tensions.

With the help of China and other concerned countries, India's High Commissioner to Pakistan Ajay Bisaria, who was called back to India after the tensions escalated, returned to Islamabad on Saturday. This indicates a large military confrontation has been averted.

How should Pakistan and India resolve their conflicts? The question has been confusing the two countries for a long time as there seems to be no perfect solution. Considering that both sides are on the verge of military conflict and even a war, the current situation can be dangerous. Although it seems that there will not be a large war between the two - both nations possess nuclear weapons and thus have achieved a so-called nuclear balance - it is still not a safe solution in the long run.

So what should the two countries do? We believe that political consultation must be the only channel to resolve the disputes. This is China's consistent policy, and nothing will change China's firm stand in promoting peaceful negotiations between India and Pakistan.

However, some Indians doubt China's efforts. Some Indian experts blamed China for "continued protection" of terrorists who were allegedly based in Pakistan and launched the Pulwama terror attack in February. And many Indian analysts regard China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) as a geopolitical threat.

Such irresponsible statements are not supported by the facts. Foreign ministers of China, Russia and India held the 16th trilateral meeting on February 27. During the meeting, they vowed to eradicate breeding grounds of terrorism and extremism. In fact, China, Pakistan and India share common interests in combating terrorism. It is time for India to stop the groundless accusations.

And India should also understand this: Although China supported Pakistan in alleviating poverty and wiping out terrorism, Beijing is not an enemy of New Delhi. Just the opposite: China proposed and launched the BRI, which not only meets India's needs for infrastructure construction, but also helps ease India-Pakistan tensions. India should overcome its prejudices against the BRI as the initiative will boost cooperation and help bring stability to the region.

The disputed Kashmir region is not destined to be poor and backward forever. This is China's goal and should also be the goal of both India and Pakistan. If the two countries can meet each other halfway, it would help them to build mutual trust, lay the foundation for peaceful negotiations and especially strengthen their cooperation on anti-terrorism together with China.

China will not pick sides in India-Pakistan disputes. Aiming at easing the two countries' conflicts and improving the anti-terrorist situation, China will play the role of a mediator and facilitator amid the ongoing tensions.

Give weapons pak needed rest Pak will fix india itself

 

[ziaulislam]

Straight from the chinese govt. mouth piece.

http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1141569.shtml

China will not pick sides in India-Pakistan disputes
By Li Qingqing Source:Global Times Published: 2019/3/10 19:48:39
35


As the relations between Pakistan and India are at their lowest these days, Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Kong Xuanyou paid a visit to Pakistan on Wednesday, calling the two sides to refrain from taking any actions that could further escalate the situation. Pakistan appreciated China's objective and fair stand and thanked China for its efforts to reduce the tensions.

With the help of China and other concerned countries, India's High Commissioner to Pakistan Ajay Bisaria, who was called back to India after the tensions escalated, returned to Islamabad on Saturday. This indicates a large military confrontation has been averted.

How should Pakistan and India resolve their conflicts? The question has been confusing the two countries for a long time as there seems to be no perfect solution. Considering that both sides are on the verge of military conflict and even a war, the current situation can be dangerous. Although it seems that there will not be a large war between the two - both nations possess nuclear weapons and thus have achieved a so-called nuclear balance - it is still not a safe solution in the long run.

So what should the two countries do? We believe that political consultation must be the only channel to resolve the disputes. This is China's consistent policy, and nothing will change China's firm stand in promoting peaceful negotiations between India and Pakistan.

However, some Indians doubt China's efforts. Some Indian experts blamed China for "continued protection" of terrorists who were allegedly based in Pakistan and launched the Pulwama terror attack in February. And many Indian analysts regard China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) as a geopolitical threat.

Such irresponsible statements are not supported by the facts. Foreign ministers of China, Russia and India held the 16th trilateral meeting on February 27. During the meeting, they vowed to eradicate breeding grounds of terrorism and extremism. In fact, China, Pakistan and India share common interests in combating terrorism. It is time for India to stop the groundless accusations.

And India should also understand this: Although China supported Pakistan in alleviating poverty and wiping out terrorism, Beijing is not an enemy of New Delhi. Just the opposite: China proposed and launched the BRI, which not only meets India's needs for infrastructure construction, but also helps ease India-Pakistan tensions. India should overcome its prejudices against the BRI as the initiative will boost cooperation and help bring stability to the region.

The disputed Kashmir region is not destined to be poor and backward forever. This is China's goal and should also be the goal of both India and Pakistan. If the two countries can meet each other halfway, it would help them to build mutual trust, lay the foundation for peaceful negotiations and especially strengthen their cooperation on anti-terrorism together with China.

China will not pick sides in India-Pakistan disputes. Aiming at easing the two countries' conflicts and improving the anti-terrorist situation, China will play the role of a mediator and facilitator amid the ongoing tensions.

Except it just vetoed your resolution yesterday

 

[Sanchez]

China will not pick sides the same as others. We'll do what we think is right, e.g., supply everything to meet Pak needs in time.

 

[BHarwana]

China is not picking any sides in this war but has just allowed PL-15 to be given to PAF. Hehehehe. Very bad and very sad.

 

[Shankranthi]

I prove my point there is no truth and lie in international politics only interests.you are quoting me just for sake of argument.you know in your heart its truth.
There are lots of examples around us.
Your cricket board do it because of your gov.

So far India has honored the one sided IWT despite pakistan not honoring the Simla agreement.

Its laughable to hear your peak of ethics. Your standing in the world shows your adherence to ethics. Your use of terrorism as state policy, your giving shelter to terrorists and mafia like Dawood.

The cricket board respects the sentiments of the people since they stand to make money milking those same sentiments. It is a pure business decision for them. Same for the Film industry.

China is not picking any sides in this war but has just allowed PL-15 to be given to PAF. Hehehehe. Very bad and very sad.

lol..... its called a military sale. I bet china would sell the same to India too if we were ever serious about buying it.

Give weapons pak needed rest Pak will fix india itself

lol...... US in the peak of its power tried that. Did it work ? ........ maybe you should worry about fixing pak rather than India.

 

[BHarwana]

lol..... its called a military sale. I bet china would sell the same to India too if we were ever serious about buying it

So why is India struggling and why is IAF being humiliated why not go and buy if you can? I mean Rafale has caused so much insult for BJP and IAF is struggling with old equipment so why not just click the buy button and and save humiliation for next time?