i am not making making bogus claims even the chinese kilo are named as yaun's only some modifications are done....
every one know's that J11 are copies of su-27 which became a big debate between china and russia thats trueee
and J-10 designs are derived from israil lavi aircraft whose desings were bought by china
HQ-9 is a pure copy of S300 it was further improved and made HQ-10
its not easy because there are some restictions but china crossed it
Yeah, you are making Bogus claims. Chinese have never labeled anything as Yuan class sub, it has been done by the western ones to identify it, since its design is changed. Chinese still label it as improved Song class sub. And i gave you evidence of what those differences are, but you haven't refuted it with any evidence to show it to be a copy of Kilo, with your logic, every sub is nearly a copy of each other, since their outer design shares similarities. Russians have not given any tech transfer for the Kilo to the Chinese, so can you tell with facts how its a copy of the Kilo. Tear drop shell does not suggest it to be a copy, had it been a copy, it would have been exactly like the Kilo, but even from outer design its not.
This time, understand it, J-11 was a ToT agreement with the Chinese by the Russians, in a phased manner. But the Russians after taking the money for the ToT started to give problems to the Chinese with regard to ToT, thus China cancelled the order for Su-27s coming from Russia, and started to solve the issues which the Russians have not provided as per the agreement, and China succeeded without Russian help, on which Russia got pissed off as China made something on their own and a better one. Learn the whole story, before uttering nonsense.
J-10 is not a copy design of Lavi, there are many dissimilarities between both the designs, go and try to see them.
Once again, S-300 tech has been transferred to China from Russia and China can do modifications as it likes, thus its not a copy, its licensed production with complete transfer tech.