What's new

CHINA WANTS TO QUESTION AGNI-V LAUNCH AT UN SECURITY COUNCIL

So what will happen please elaborate? A resolution sponsored by china in UN that only pakistan will support.
After that it will be back to business.
We don't know instill China seek UN clarify on India develop ban nuclear ICBM by the none member of the NSG. Just wait til the moment UN provide it own clarification on the issue of India develop nuclear ICBM to find out how and why China get the support or not at the UN resolution. China make it intention clear by China government spoke person implied if India government developed such weapon with China specific, UN have to provide China the appropriate clarification on why India exempt to develop a nuclear ICBM as a none nuclear state.

Double dare India government to declare India ICBM will arm with nuclear warhead and China specific.
 
.
In 1998 , the sole superpower US could not do anything in 2017 China wants to do something against India in UN. hahaha... if there is a vote, India will gain more votes than them. Its proved in NSG voting. China was the lone country in 60 nation NSG to vote against India, though any one country can block it. And also they did not get support for MTCR. shame.
 
.
All China wants to clarify in the UN, is why India said the missile is China specific..

Government of India never said that.... its the media... what you can do is.. you can ban those channels if they are available in china..

Don't worry we have already alternative plans for getting water. But soon you will need your verdic technology and spaceship for trade using Pakistan economic exclusive zone through arabian sea or our air space.
And hope you too have some plans to import water from china.
And also hope you have alternative plan to give water to your gujrat and rajasthan in that case too.


Only one person says so. The rest of the world say that Pakistani scientist abdul qadeer khan stole blue prints from west. And different parts were purchased from black market and some western companies. Many were later found guilty.
It's commonly known as AQ Khan Network.

Lol... do you even know the deference between territorial waters and eez!??? Our ships can pass through ur eez there's nothing you can do about it..
 
.
The intentions are very clear, India wants to have a deterrence against China, Agni V with its 5000km range provides the perfect deterrence.
This is especially needed when you see a very assertive China and its aggressive foreign policy in the south China sea.

India will test an ICBM range missile very soon, this is purely to project itself as a major global military power.
Also all this huff puff is required to strengthen India's bid for permanent seat at the UNSC.

As chinese scienstist said, A V is a 8000 to 9000 KM Range missile. We shall test Avi with 10000+ KM range but say that it is a 5000 KM range missile and true range shall never be revealed.
 
.
China government have their way to prove India ICBM will arm with nuclear warhead through UN mandate of inspecting India nuclear material nuclear weapons development, I dare India government endorse the India news article statement. India government can find out if China can exert it status at UN Security Council. All India government need to said what China believe India ICBM is China specific.

Lol.... if china was capable of doing that then they would've done it in 98 when india became a nuclear state... why do you think china couldn't? ?!?? And now india is a powerful state not a weak state where UN can run around

Bangladesh was part of pakistan just like India claims Kashmir , India trained mukti bani terrorists which they sent east pakistan to fought with pak army , now when we are giving you similar doze in Kashmir Now Shupaa pawa India crying like bitch looook they sending terrorists they training terrorists.. Hahaha but world know this what pakistan is doing with you Endians.... We have Chines , Russians , and Iranians in our pockets ..Just wait and see what we are going to do with you in Afghanistan and in Kashmir ;)

The only difference is we broke your country while pakistan is failing in both political move and terrorism move.... look at the capabilities of pakistan:undecided:
 
.
This time there is a change in china's stand. Instead of issuing warning, china has taken a democratic path to raise the issue in UN. China is getting democratic. I like this and I hail china for that.
 
.
This is the problem with Indian media, they like to boast and go overboard. In diplomacy, everything is about subtlety. Everybody know India build Agni to counter China and Pakistan, but there is no need to say it out loud. This is smart move by China, by using UN to put pressure on India's nuclear test. China do have justification to demand that inquiry after the Indian media boasting about targeting China with Agni.
 
.
What explicit regulations does UN security council has on India? Can any Indian member clarify.
 
.
Babur is nothing but Chinese HN-1B.
It uses a Ukrainian made RD-95-300 twin spool turbonfan.

OK so let me guess were you part of the Babur development project which makes you speak with such authority or because it's Pakistani hence Indians are born experts on Pakistani related matters hence the Usual
 
.
What explicit regulations does UN security council has on India? Can any Indian member clarify.


Nothing, its just Chinese frustration.

OK so let me guess were you part of the Babur development project which makes you speak with such authority or because it's Pakistani hence Indians are born experts on Pakistani related matters hence the Usual


If tomorrow Bhutan tests a missile everyone will be surprised and above all after first test itself everything is ready for induction. Because Bhutan does not have any infrastructure or r&d base to develop a bike.
 
.
China can demand UN to clarify their stand on India developed the nuclear warhead capable icbm that directly aimed at China security. China can bring up US motion with UN voted in favorite of sanction Iran for develop icbm with the capable of nuclear warhead. By grouping India with Iran as the none nuclear state, UN have the obligation to prevent India from further develop nuclear capable icbm. China have the meant to force UN to come up a punitive measurement on India for developing a nuclear weapon with China specific.


It is not aimed at China. It is aimed at Madagascar

upload_2016-12-28_17-57-23.png


Reason

they stole the penguins

upload_2016-12-28_17-58-41.jpeg
 
. .
is this some kinda joke ?? if it is then its gonna be slapped right and left by US first then rest of the countries will line up to do same .. Remind why chinese developed long ranged 10k km for US? did us went to UN crying ? its only proved one thing that is chinese are well aware of Agni capabilities.. and to stop further development of agni into MIRV which will even worst nightmare for both neighbours
 
.
All China wants to clarify in the UN, is why India said the missile is China specific..

Republic of India is having border dispute with Chinese and our territories are under Chinese occupation.

http://www.deccanherald.com/content/588737/raha-brushes-aside-chinese-reaction.html

Brushing aside Chinese reaction on the test firing of long-range nuclear capable missile Agni-V, IAF chief Air Chief Marshal Arup Raha today said India should carry on with its task of building deterrence capability.


In an apparent swipe at China, he said one should not talk about someone else doing something unless it is prohibited like nuclear proliferation and went on to add that it is "common knowledge" as to what is happening in this region "in terms of collusion, transfer of technology which is forbidden".

Underlining that India is only building up its deterrence capability, Raha, who is also the Chairman Chief of Staff Committee, said the country will have to build its capability "in order to strike deep into adversary's heartland" which will act as a deterrent.

The Agni V missile, with an over 5000 km range, covers the entire China. Reacting to the missile test-firing, Chinese Foreign Ministry had yesterday hoped that it complied with UN Security Council rules and safeguarded South Asia's strategic balance.

"I think in international diplomacy, normal diplomacy or military diplomacy, these posturing and signalling will always be there.

"So we should just go about with our task, meet our own requirements, security challenges," Raha said addressing a press conference here days before he demotes office on December 31.

Not mincing words, Raha said he will not like to comment on what somebody else is doing unless it is prohibited. "Like nuclear proliferation, which is common knowledge to everyone, what is happening in this region, in terms of collusion, transfer of technology which is forbidden. This is all common knowledge. I am not saying something new," he said, without naming any country.

The IAF chief stated that India is legitimately developing its capability indigenously and he does not think anyone should complain about it.

Raha said India is "obviously building up" capability not to actually fight a conflict as it believes in peace and tranquillity. "But we also know we have been drawn into conflicts several times in the past. So going by historical experience, we have to build our capability. Capability to deter. How do we deter an adversary who is strong? We have to build up capability in order to strike deep into adversary's heartland, take on targets effectively which will hurt the adversary," he said. Raha added that this capability is being built up especially with the IAF's striking prowess.

"We are building up our forces in the sea. The army is being strengthened further in terms of a new strike corps. I think a lot of effort is going on to tackle any contingency... creation of infrastructure, induction of equipment," he said.

Raha underlined that overall there is a thrust by the government and the armed forces to bolster deterrence capability more than anything else. "It is not specific to any country," he said.

The IAF chief refused to name China in any of his comments despite repeated questions on China's defence capability.

Raha said every country has the right to make its own assessment of security needs.
"It will not be appropriate for me to speak about any country in the neighbourhood. But definitely, we take everything into consideration when we do a threat appreciation," he said.

The air chief said India's efforts on capability matrix are not based against one single country but on the threat appreciation as well as its plans for where it wants to be in future, what role does it want to play in the region and on the world stage and what reputation it wants to create.

"Definitely some of the countries are doing very well. One of our neighbours has lot of money, lot of wealth. They have progressed very well. They have enough funds to put into research and development which is common knowledge," he said.
 
.
Bangladesh was part of pakistan just like India claims Kashmir , India trained mukti bani terrorists which they sent east pakistan to fought with pak army , now when we are giving you similar doze in Kashmir Now Shupaa pawa India crying like bitch looook they sending terrorists they training terrorists.. Hahaha but world know this what pakistan is doing with you Endians.... We have Chines , Russians , and Iranians in our pockets ..Just wait and see what we are going to do with you in Afghanistan and in Kashmir ;)
you have scared me ....we are doomed another 1000 years of muslim rule
on topic
considering the threat perception we have we have the right to defend ourselves ..as both china and pak are having nuclear weapon and with one of them sleep and awake to give only nuclear rant
we have no other options....
at this junction no country in the world would like to be seen as openly and unnecessarily hostile to india .let alone sanction..sooner than later china will realise it better it will be for both india china...they can trouble us but ultimately they will also have to give what is ours right
just as they get their due after repeated snubs from the west and us
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom