What's new

China vs Post British India

.
Technically both were under the British. China was nothing without its great river ports, and all of those were British navy controlled. The hinterland never excited the British as the Indian mainland did. Hence their remarkable lack of enthusiasm to occupy it beyond the great ports. Through which everything came and went anyways.

And through opium, if you want to split hairs, Chinese generations were in a dreamy stupor administered by Indians, and one that they seemingly have not yet awoken from.
 
.
Technically both were under the British. China was nothing without its great river ports, and all of those were British navy controlled. The hinterland never excited the British as the Indian mainland did. Hence their remarkable lack of enthusiasm to occupy it beyond the great ports. Through which everything came and went anyways.

And through opium, if you want to split hairs, Chinese generations were in a dreamy stupor administered by Indians, and one that they seemingly have not yet awoken from.
If China is really under British, there wouldn't be second opium war and the boxed rebellion war. Obviously some try to drag China down with them as full colonial without a head. :enjoy:
 
.
If China is really under British, there wouldn't be second opium war and the boxed rebellion war. Obviously some try to drag China down with them as full colonial without a head. :enjoy:
Loyal Indian slaves believe everyone is under their beloved Bristish white masters rule and Indians are the master slave second only to their white masters.
 
.
Technically both were under the British. China was nothing without its great river ports, and all of those were British navy controlled. The hinterland never excited the British as the Indian mainland did. Hence their remarkable lack of enthusiasm to occupy it beyond the great ports. Through which everything came and went anyways.

And through opium, if you want to split hairs, Chinese generations were in a dreamy stupor administered by Indians, and one that they seemingly have not yet awoken from.
China was colonized by Britain like India? Is this a new education for slums?
 
. .
.
delusional Indians using "Post British India" as disguise for their favourite “undivided India”, do they even ask PAK or BD if they want to be included in this comparison?
 
. .
images


I highly recommend this as absorbing reading for those interested in the roots of modern China.

I tried to find a Mandarin translation for our wumao here but sadly could not.

In all seriousness, this book (read it years ago) really helped me understand China and the way it sees the modern world. A good read.
 
.
images


I highly recommend this as absorbing reading for those interested in the roots of modern China.

I tried to find a Mandarin translation for our wumao here but sadly could not.

In all seriousness, this book (read it years ago) really helped me understand China and the way it sees the modern world. A good read.
Understanding China from a book written by a westerner? are you kidding me?
 
.
Understanding China from a book written by a westerner? are you kidding me?

Beijing bhai, you want us to understand China through a book written by a Chinese citizen under the CCP?

Trust me, you guys are very poor ambassadors of what is definitely a great civilization.

And in many ways so are our current crowd.

We are regaining our former greatness. But are quite cringey about it in the PR worldwide. I hope we improve with improving heft.
 
.
Technically both were under the British. China was nothing without its great river ports, and all of those were British navy controlled. The hinterland never excited the British as the Indian mainland did. Hence their remarkable lack of enthusiasm to occupy it beyond the great ports. Through which everything came and went anyways.

And through opium, if you want to split hairs, Chinese generations were in a dreamy stupor administered by Indians, and one that they seemingly have not yet awoken from.
So, British India and China were all the same under British, how delusional are these Indians ? These slum Indians think they were masters of Chinese only second to your white masters. Check the following real simple history.

Churchill, explaining why he defended the stockpiling of food within Britain, while millions died of starvation in Bengal, told his private secretary that “the Hindus were a foul race, protected by their mere pullulation from the doom that is their due.”[2]






Yet, the Indian prime minister claimed that British colonial rule of India was beneficial to Indians, how ironic.

 
Last edited:
.
So, British India and China were all the same under British, how delusional are these Indians ? These slum Indians think they were masters of Chinese only second to their white masters. Check the following real simple history.

Churchill, explaining why he defended the stockpiling of food within Britain, while millions died of starvation in Bengal, told his private secretary that “the Hindus were a foul race, protected by their mere pullulation from the doom that is their due.”[2]




Etylo bhai, foul racist bigot fat man's chair is now held by an Indian. And a pretty devout Hindu.
 
. .

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom