What's new

China US relations

muse

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Oct 26, 2006
Messages
13,006
Reaction score
0
China tangled up in red, white and blue
By Dingli Shen

China is keenly following the Democratic and Republican tickets in the United States presidential elections - the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) even sent Ma Hui, director for the Americas at the CCP Central Committee's International Department - to observe the Democratic National Convention at the invitation of the National Democratic Institute, marking the first time that the CCP has participated in an American political party convention.

Numerous government-affiliated think-tank reports in China have repeatedly stated that Sino-US relations are the single most important bilateral relations for Beijing. Since Deng Xiaoping, the de facto leader of the People's Republic of China from 1978 to the early 1990s, initiated China's economic reforms, the United States has facilitated China's opening and development by providing capital and technology as well as an immense market for Chinese exports.

In 2006 US foreign investment in China reached $22 billion, more than twice the amount four years earlier. Outsourcing by US businesses has propped up China's growing labor market while generating more taxable income, which in turn promotes social stability - and by extension the government's legitimacy in the eyes of the Chinese polity.

These are facilitating factors that have accompanied the transition of the Chinese economy from a centrally planned to a more market-oriented system. Respondents to a recent survey published by the Institute of Sociology of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS) revealed that 75 % agreed that China was stable and harmonious - although the same study expressed concerns over the possibility of increasing conflict between the masses and government officials
.

The Chinese view of its government's relations with the United States is primarily based on economic terms and is shaped around the premise that it sees China as a newly developing economy that offers opportunities to American investors to expand their wealth. According to The 2008 Pew Global Attitudes Survey in China, 55 % of Chinese respondents think China's economy has a positive effect on the economies of other countries.

Low-cost Chinese manufacturing helps save $70 billion for American taxpayers annually, which provides credit for the United States to spend additionally elsewhere where needed. Beijing provides support to the currency of the US government by investing heavily in US Treasury Bonds and government-backed subprime mortgages at some $1 trillion in total.

According to Ha Jiming, the chief economist for China International Capital Corp, it is estimated that China holds up to $400 billion in Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac securities.

Parallel to this trend toward greater interdependence on the economic front, Beijing has been the host of the six-party talks since 2003. Beijing has - in measures proportionate to its evolving security interests - joined Western-led international sanctions against Iran's nuclear proliferation. In reciprocal measures China expects the United States to curtail Taiwan's move toward independence. Beijing cannot accept Washington's intervention in a resolution of the Taiwan Strait through its continued arms sales to Taiwan. Thus China has been augmenting its military to render its threat to Taiwanese independence more credible.


China as an election issue
China policy has been a major bone of contention in the past two US presidential elections, especially after the end of the Cold War as the United States fundamentally needed to remap and redefine its security environment and national interests respectively. Former president Bill Clinton, when campaigning in 1992, vowed to sweep away repressive regimes from Baghdad to Beijing. President George W Bush came into power in 2001 with the belief that China would be the United States' "strategic competitor".

In the 1992 and 2000 elections, it was more relevant for Beijing to watch who would be elected in Washington, given the stark differences of the candidates' China policy. Beijing tended to lean toward the side of the governing party: it was Clinton who challenged the China policy of George H W Bush, and it was the latter's son who was hostile to the China policy manifested in Clinton's second term that emphasized engagement with China.

When welcoming Former Chinese president Jiang Zemin to visit Washington in 1997, Clinton even called US relations with China a "constructive strategic partnership toward the 21st century". Compared to the 2000 election, the salience of China as a contentious issue in the 2008 presidential campaign has been much less pronounced in the race for the White House between Senator John McCain and Senator Barack Obama.

This demonstrates to the Chinese that, within the past decade, there has emerged a nascent bipartisan consensus on China in the United States: That with US cooperation, China has successfully embarked upon economic reform and is effectively shaping Chinese institutions. When coupled to the success of the Beijing Olympics, these reforms have generated a great amount of Chinese enthusiasm and productivity, as well as wealth that enrich both Chinese and American. China's opening has made the country far more connected to the international community, both strengthening the nation while exposing its vulnerability due to increasing global interdependence
.

The 2008 presidential election
Sino-US relations are stabilizing, and it has been less critical to base Chinese assessments on the ideology and personality of the candidates. After all, Beijing and Washington have managed to overcome the fall out from the collision between a US Navy EP-3 Reconnaissance aircraft with a Chinese jetfighter in 2001.

Bush has since visited China four times including his most recent participation in the Beijing Olympics. Yet Beijing is still keenly observing US electoral politics as the policy priorities of the different presidential candidates may still diverge.

The United States is now China's number one export destination; China's exports to the United States in the first six months of 2008 totaled $116.79 billion, up 8.9% from the same period last year. Furthermore, China's export volume to the United States stood at $232.7 billion in 2007, representing an increase of 14.4 % over the same period in 2006 [1]. In peacetime, the Chinese government will first consider domestic economic development, measured primarily at this stage by production and export, though often at the cost of environmental and ecologic degradation.

The United States faces immense economic volatility, especially with the subprime mortgage crisis coupled by the spike in oil prices as well as the weakening dollar. Due to globalization, China's economy is now increasingly intertwined with the rest of the world, in particular with the United States. A decline in the US economy would undercut America's ability to consume, hence reducing its demand to import from China.

Obama appears firm in advocating a value-based international trade system, urging negotiations with the EU on a trade arrangement that will take labor and environmental factors into account. Obama has suggested revising NAFTA (the North American Free Trade Agreement) to allow similar considerations. Though he has not said much about China, Obama has indeed indicated that his administration will "use all the diplomatic avenues available to seek a change in China's currency practice" to balance US economic relations with China. Overall, Obama appears to take a tougher position on China regarding issues of trade, currency, and environment/climate as well the protection of intellectual property rights (IPRs).

McCain has also stressed the need to keep China committed to international trade rules, protecting IPRs, reducing tariffs of manufacturing industries, and honoring the promise for a market-oriented currency exchange rate. In the meantime, he has noted that to assure US leadership, America shall seek international cooperation rather than isolation, and global free trade rather than national protectionism. He has also suggested that the United States should provide necessary low-carbon-emission technology to China and India because it would benefit America.

Whether Americans elect McCain or Obama as the next president of the United States, there is likely to be less volatility in bilateral relations and fewer concerns in Beijing that there will be any major policy shift in US-China policy compared to previous elections.


Note
1. The US-China Business Council, US-China Trade Statistics and China's World Trade Statistics.

Shen Dingli is a professor and director of the Center for American Studies at Fudan University. He is also the executive dean of Fudan's Institute of International Studies. He has a PhD in physics and did arms control post-doc at Princeton University from 1989-1991. He was an Eisenhower Fellow (1997) and advisor to the UN secretary general for strategic planning (2002).
 
.
I dont think China cares much about who finally wins the US presidential election, coz the two parties behave approxmately the same in dealing with China--namely from radicalism to realism if we look through the whole tenure.

the only difference exists in the current election that by now both are not likely to denounce China on whatever they disagree like trade friction, slow appreciation of Rmb, and humanright etc,etc...anyway if those are still a popular theme among Americans, they will make it in no time.

The Chinese observer at US election is mainly for an overall feel, China has been testing regional direct elections for years in rural places, and started an experimental political reform last year in Shenzhen.
 
.
You may be right but a little contribution to the right democrat or Liberal goes a long way. For China it is a trillion dollar question. Wheresas they may not care much about who comes to power, if they can grease the right palm, the results can be much more lucrative for them.At the end of the day this is all business.
Araz
 
.
The Sino-US relations is important and complicated which has been mentioned for many times. This is true if one looks at the political and economical aspect.

Which ever party comes into power, be it the Democrats or the Republicans, the China policy would not change drastically to the current policy.

The new administration already have a headache with the financial turmoil and the ME region.

The US sees China as a stakeholder in the world system.
 
.
“To be a respectable friend of US, you should be its never beaten opponent.” - quoted from a Chinese forum.
 
.
China and the United States is not an enemy, nor is it a friend
 
.
Ya China and the USA not an enemy, nor a friend but INDIA and USA definetly a Friend Now. Friendship will get stronger as time pass by. Lol. INDIA do need Best military weapons from USA. Dont they? Hahaha. Its worrying time for China coz Russia not giving best weapons to china and we all know Chinees weapons. Its Quantity and not Quality Lol. Indo-usa friendship not in favour of china. U may argue m wrong but its truth Lol.

yesterday you were cursing this good friend for sanction, and cursing Russia for rising price of their "best weapons" .lol
 
.
yesterday you were cursing this good friend for sanction, and cursing Russia for rising price of their "best weapons" .lol

What did you mean yesterday? it says that was his first post.:what:
 
. .
we got plenty to pay.

good for you, moneybags, better watch your military budget/GNP. lol
dot forget you will be feeding a biggest population in decades,say, 50 years or less. and by now your infrastructure is still low , which takes big bucks to improve.

I wont bother your theory that weapons alone decide the outcome of war, but I guess the days that Indian jets mount the high horse in Pakistan's territorial air are gone.
 
.
we got plenty to pay. No worries Lol. By the way india do need Russia coz of 5th generation jet fighter PAK-FA. I just wonder when pakistan's F-16 cant match mighty Sukhoi-30MKI than how pakistan's Jet fighters can match PAK-FA? Lol. May be than pakistan should start dreaming of F-35 hahaha but first dream F-18 which might b available by 2030 for Pakistan Lol.

like... why does defence.pk has to keep up with these indian trollers?? since he is an idiot i would like to burst his wet dreaming bobble.. well its just how these untouchables are brought up in their society...

buddy just one thing about china and this will give you a heart attack.. in 2020 China's defence budget will be 350 billion dollars!! china is one of 3 countries working on stealth projects including 5th generation fighters..

PAF will soon make its order for chinese J-xx and FC-20 are already coming.. J-11 could also be offered like mig-21/F-7.. and mind you PLAAF and PLAN J-11 fleet in 2015 will be superior to IAF MKI! by then they will possess over 600 J-11 SU-30s..
 
.
we got plenty to pay. No worries Lol. By the way india do need Russia coz of 5th generation jet fighter PAK-FA. I just wonder when pakistan's F-16 cant match mighty Sukhoi-30MKI than how pakistan's Jet fighters can match PAK-FA? Lol. May be than pakistan should start dreaming of F-35 hahaha but first dream F-18 which might b available by 2030 for Pakistan Lol.

I can't stop laughing after reading this post. I guess you must be one of those Indians that would bash Pakistan whenever you get the opportunity. I am sure you don't represent the other Indians on this forum.

You actually remind me of an Indian friend that I know who kept telling me India is superior than China in all fields and soon overtake the US. I admire his patriotism, but this this is too much laughter. :usflag:
 
.
like... why does defence.pk has to keep up with these indian trollers?? since he is an idiot i would like to burst his wet dreaming bobble.. well its just how these untouchables are brought up in their society...

buddy just one thing about china and this will give you a heart attack.. in 2020 China's defence budget will be 350 billion dollars!! china is one of 3 countries working on stealth projects including 5th generation fighters..

PAF will soon make its order for chinese J-xx and FC-20 are already coming.. J-11 could also be offered like mig-21/F-7.. and mind you PLAAF and PLAN J-11 fleet in 2015 will be superior to IAF MKI! by then they will possess over 600 J-11 SU-30s..


India is a arrogant country,maybe they have forgetton the war which broken out at 1960s,they losted the war eventhough they have the support from soviet and US.
 
.
China aircraft maker sells 5 jets to GE

ZHUHAI: China’s main aircraft maker has sealed an agreement worth up to $750 million to sell five jets, with an option for 20 more, to General Electric’s aircraft leasing arm, in its first major overseas deal for the homegrown plane.

The government-backed Commercial Aircraft Corporation of China (COMAC) signed an official agreement with GE Commercial Aviation Services on the Chinese-designed ARJ21 civilian jets on Tuesday at the biennial Zhuhai airshow in southern China.

“It is the first time that an aircraft that is researched and developed by China is sold to the US, such a high-end market,” said Zhang Qingwei, the Chairman of COMAC. “Also, during the process of implementing this contract we will be able to greatly improve ourselves in terms of mass production, customer service and industry awareness.”

GE Commercial had signed a preliminary agreement in March with COMAC to buy five 78-seat ARJ21 jets fitted with GE engines, with an option to buy another 20 at an unspecified date.

“The options are not going to be exercised at this point,” Andre Robert, head of marketing for GE Aviation, told Reuters.

Margaret Lee, GE Aviation’s GM, said the aircraft would cost around $30 million each and she expected the ARJ21 to obtain flight certification by US and Chinese aviation authorities by 2010, with the planes to be delivered soon afterwards. “We have confidence and belief in this airplane,” she said, without specifying where these aircraft might be used or leased.

The airshow also saw Bank of China’s Singapore-based aviation leasing arm place an order for 20 Airbus A320-aircraft, including some that were previously ordered by a carrier that failed. The Airbus orders were largely those taken over from an existing order for Airbus aircraft placed by Skybus Airlines Inc., a low-cost US carrier that shut its operations in April, a BOC executive told Reuters in an email.

Global ambition: China’s bold dream to develop its own jetliner industry comes as the aviation industry undergoes a severe downturn partly from the bleak global economic outlook.

The International Air Transport Association (IATA) reported an “alarming” drop in global passenger traffic growth for September of 2.9 percent, the first decline since the SARS epidemic in 2003.

With an aim to eventually compete with industry giants Boeing and Airbus in the global market, COMAC already has more than 100 orders for the ARJ21 jet, unveiled last December and due for commercial deliveries from the third quarter of 2009.

But most of the orders are from domestic carriers. Some analysts said despite the GE deal, the economic downturn could make it more difficult for COMAC to ink vital new foreign orders.

“The problem is although China’s appetite for aircraft is huge, it still doesn’t satisfy them starting their own manufacturing business simply for themselves,” said Stephen Miller, the head of aviation consultancy the Trinity Group in Hong Kong. They’ve really got to sell outside China because they need the numbers.”

Other participants at the biennial Zhuhai Airshow, China’s largest aviation event with more than 60 aircraft, helicopters, military jets and the Shenzhou VII space module on display, shrugged off the competitive threat posed by China.

“We are totally in favour of what is happening here in China. It is only normal that a country like China would want to develop its own aircraft manufacturing industry,” Laurence Barron, President of Airbus China, told reporters.

Incorporated in Shanghai earlier this year by the merger of China’s two state aircraft makers, AVIC I and AVIC II, COMAC, also known by the initials CACC, became the country’s first maker of large-sized passenger aircraft.

General Electric and Parker Hannifin Corp are among the companies that supply parts for the ARJ21 jet. reuters
 
.
China aircraft maker sells 5 jets to GE

...

This looks like ground-breaking news that China first exports aircraft to US. I believe China even has problems to export cars to US. (BTW, I have been waiting for Chinese cars to arrive but ended up with a Japanese car.)

Hopefully, China will follow up with quality customer services, which is of vital importance in today's market.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom