China tests missile air defence system

[tanlixiang28776]

I have NEVER posted entire wiki sources. I only post relevant passages. I have also posted passages from credible third party sources, such as academecias or patent repositories, so that the readers can use relevant keywords searches and verify what I said for himself. Am open for correction but I do not recall any of you Chinese boys ever done the same.

Is it some kind of self inmposed code that you have to include Chinese boy in every one of your posts? Fine Vietnamese boy how about you post relevant things to the thread instead of making unprovoked attacks because you feel butt hurt all the time.

 

[gambit]

Is it some kind of code that you have to include Chinese boy in every one of your posts? Fine Vietnamese boy how about you post relevant things to the thread instead of making unprovoked attacks because you feel butt hurt all the time.

Looks like am the one who is giving the 'butt hurt' here, kid.

 

[tanlixiang28776]

Looks like am the one who is giving the 'butt hurt' here, kid.

WTF. English. Learn it Vietnamese boy.

 

[oct605032048]

Doubt this indian source and the whole battlefield environment is different.

The first thing the French planes they gonna meet is not SAMs but missiles launched from J-10/11. And missiles will pay a visit to their aircraft carrier in minutes.

BEIJING (PTI): Chinese military has conducted a drill to test its integrated air defence capability under the scenario of a massive air strike.

China tests missile air defence system - Brahmand.com

 

[gambit]

They sure take the trouble to analyze battle scenarios and equipments very thoroughly ....from recent conflicts. Wonder how they would simulate the jammers , A to G equipment of the U.S / N.A.TO calibre to test against their Air defence systems . Can some knowladgable Chinese member shed some light on this ?

The Chinese cannot. In ECM/ECCM, there is no such thing as 'simulation'. If there are any sort of 'simulation' going on, it will be to simulate the consequences of a failed system, but not of or on the system itself. If there is a known technological gap between adversaries, especially if you are in the inferior, you cannot know the ECM tactics the superior can or will employ against you. The best you can do is assume the worst, which is that your system will fail in the superior electronic onslaught, and simulate recovery responses.

 

[Bigoren]

What you Chinese boys are good at is posting verbatim news sources. And Photochopped crap. What the readers want/need is the foundational information that enabled the possibilities of these weapons systems. That none of you have and that is the truth.

Blah blah blah,talking shxt is one of your job to pretend a profesional.

 

[rcrmj]

Blah blah blah,talking shxt is one of your job to pretend a profesional.

It is evident that ‘gaybit’s real life is a failure with awful personality, that’s why he takes PDF and other virtual life as means of consolation remedy.. we should help him out as PDF is a big family! We should applause everything he posts and suggests, lets treat him as pro as he self-claimed. That will solve all the problems between the Chinese member and that ‘souless Gaybit’!

agree?!

 

[ZhengHe]

What you Chinese boys are good at is posting verbatim news sources. And Photochopped crap. What the readers want/need is the foundational information that enabled the possibilities of these weapons systems. That none of you have and that is the truth.

Didn't you say the J-20 didn't exist? You also posted some some "logical" reasoning backed by your so-called "military experience" (lol) or whatever sh*t.

And what happened?

Let's face it, you are as credible as those dozens of "experts" who write books about China's demise. They also use a lot of "logical" reasoning too, just like you Gambit.

 

[ZhengHe]

The Chinese cannot. In ECM/ECCM, there is no such thing as 'simulation'. If there are any sort of 'simulation' going on, it will be to simulate the consequences of a failed system, but not of or on the system itself. If there is a known technological gap between adversaries, especially if you are in the inferior, you cannot know the ECM tactics the superior can or will employ against you. The best you can do is assume the worst, which is that your system will fail in the superior electronic onslaught, and simulate recovery responses.

Frankly, I don't know what hell ECM/ECCM is but I call BULLSHIT LOL

Hey Gambit, stop spewing garbage and provide some real facts to support your claims, which shouldn't be too difficult for you being a "military expert" and all, right right? You seem to talk a lot of nonsense with no actual knowledge of what you are talking about.

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

Frankly, I don't know what hell ECM/ECCM is but I call BULLSHIT LOL

Hey Gambit, stop spewing garbage and provide some real facts to support your claims, which shouldn't be too difficult for you being a "military expert", right right? You talk a lot of nonsense with no actual knowledge of what you are talking about.

The cyberspace is free, everyone can talk all sort of gibberish, so let them having the fun.

 

[ao333]

These Vietnamese rednecks oral different daddies at different times. They even proclaim to be Americans whilst born in Vietnam. Deplorable wannabes: it's you and your black buddies who contribute to the unemployment rate and entitlement strains in the US economy. GTFO

 

[ZhengHe]

These Vietnamese rednecks oral different daddies at different times. They even proclaim to be Americans whilst born in Vietnam. Deplorable wannabes: it's you and your black buddies who contribute to the unemployment rate and entitlement strains in the US economy. GTFO

Are you a member of the Falun Gong?

 

[no_name]

Stay on topic guys or just ignore the thread.

 

[Obambam]

that is some nice technology

lol... dude you crack me up!

 

[cloneman]

Are you a member of the Falun Gong?
I think he"s a native Canadian who just doesnt want a third level Vietamnese banana jumping up and down and treands to represents the whites atitute.