China Shows Democracy Is Not Key for Growth, EU Commissioner Says

[faithfulguy]

We use English names to make it easier to communicate, unlike you Indians who give up your language and are proud of it

Indians did not give up their languages in their own states. Such as Tamil Nadu or Karnataka. But as India was created by the British, every Indians agree that English is the authorities legal language of India. Indian constitution is written in English. And major laws were written in English. The only way for Indians to gain freedom is to revert to the political boundaries before British arrival.

 

[etylo]

If economics progress is the PRIMARY issue, then the current China model works. But if you want humanity and economics, then you need the democracy-capitalism duo.

Speaking of humanity, like "democratic" US and Indian govs let ten of millions of its citizens die hopelessly and needlessly in the pandemic with unmatched brutality compared to the so called "autocratic" China. Where is your humanity in democracy, hypocrite ?

 

[etylo]

We use English names to make it easier to communicate, unlike you Indians who give up your language and are proud of it

Yeah, it's a bad practice of using Western names, it is a worship of Western or Anglo culture too on Chinese part. Chinese should get rid of this bad habit or they will lose their indelible cultural identity just as that all the English and other foreign languages only names and signs on many high end shops and buildings should be banned in China too as in USA and Canada, some Chinese there don't understand the foreign languages signs, these practices are shameful. Not everything can be explained as just for convenience, people have identities, and Chinese are living in China, they shouldn't worship foreign cultures too much.

 

[Viet]

China has proven that non-democracy, non-white, non-Christian, non-western ideology country can achieve economic success. Which almost denies all principles USA is holding and wants to spread to all over the world. China to USA is like Copernicus or Galileo to Holy See. USA hates China for good reasons.

In economics theorem, growth of a nation has not related to government system. It has nothing to do with races. It has nothing to do with religions, ether.

 

[etylo]

In economics theorem, growth of a nation has not related to government system. It has nothing to do with races. It has nothing to do with religions, ether.

And that's why the economists and you don't know what the hell you are talking about ! Unlike the Russian gov under Yeltsin that got screwed up badly by the Western economists, it's a good thing that the Chinese gov never listen to the economists especially Western ones to run the country. The only time that the Chinese gov listened to the Western economists was in 1989 when upon the advise to embark a shock therapy in economic reform by these idiots or evils, the Chinese gov suddenly freed the price control in the country and it brought 50% inflation of products within weeks, and then Chinese were angry as hell and the country almost got destroyed in the 1989 Tiananmen incident. Chinese learned its lesson not to trust Western economists for advise to run Chinese economy.

 

[Viet]

And that's why the economists and you don't know what the hell you are talking about ! Unlike the Russian gov under Yeltsin that got screwed up badly by the Western economists, it's a good thing that the Chinese gov never listen to the economists especially Western ones to run the country. The only time that the Chinese gov listened to the Western economists was in 1989 when upon the advise to embark a shark therapy in economic reform by these idiots or evils, the Chinese gov suddenly freed the price control in the country and it brought 50% inflation of products within weeks, and then Chinese were angry as hell and the country almost got destroyed in the 1989 Tiananmen incident. Chinese learned its lesson not to trust Western economists for advise to run Chinese economy.

Read Adam Smith “The wealth of nations” of 1776.
The book every student has to read at the first semester. I myself did it.
Economy has nothing to do with skin color. I wonder why people tend to make it to a political thing.

 

[Surya 1]

CPC army needs repeated reaffirmation to justify dictatorship.

 

[beijingwalker]

CPC army needs repeated reaffirmation to justify dictatorship.

CPC doesn't have to do that, just tell the population to have a look at how democracy work in India is enough to make the Chinese people try to avoid this democracy as if it's a plague.

GDP growth and scale

 

[Surya 1]

CPC doesn't have to do that, just tell the population to have a look at how democracy work in India is enough to make the Chinese people try to avoid this democracy as if it's a plague.

Yes, has jack ma reappeared in China?

 

[beijingwalker]

Yes, has jack ma reappeared in China?

He had been disappeared by western media several times already, they did it again?

 

[etylo]

Read Adam Smith “The wealth of nations” of 1776.
The book every student has to read at the first semester. I myself did it.
Economy has nothing to do with skin color. I wonder why people tend to make it to a political thing.

So, you think the performances of the economies of Black African countries, India and China for examples are unrelated to their races, cultures and governments ? Give me a break ! It's so obvious the performances have lots to do with above factors, you are the biggest joker. When Adam Smith talked about economy in his time, he was probably thinking of Europe or Western Europe only, then races, cultures, religions and maybe governments didn't matter that much because there are not much difference between them in European especially Western European countries.

 

[Viet]

So, you think the performances of the economies of Black African countries, India and China for examples are unrelated to their races, cultures and governments ? Give me a break ! It's so obvious the performances have lots to do with above factors, you are the biggest joker. When Adam Smith talked about economy in his time, he was probably thinking of Europe or Western Europe only, then races, cultures, religions and maybe governments didn't matter that much because there are not much difference between them in European especially Western European countries.

What I am saying the wealth of nation is not linked to races, to government systems, to continent, to religion. There is no correlation. Belgium is rich. Singapore is rich. About China, I can write an essay but I am lazy.

 

[kankan326]

In economics theorem, growth of a nation has not related to government system. It has nothing to do with races. It has nothing to do with religions, ether.

You should ask US, not me. It is US who tries to convince the world that only west model can bring prosperity.

 

[etylo]

What I am saying the wealth of nation is not linked to races, to government systems, to continent, to religion. There is no correlation. Belgium is rich. Singapore is rich. About China, I can write an essay but I am lazy.

Then, you don't know what are you talking about. Both Singapore and Belgium have relatively good governments in management, both countries have relatively educated, skilled, disciplined and good work ethic populations when compared to say Black African countries. That's why SG and Bel can develop their countries and become rich. There are many similarities underneath between the two countries that are most important for the development of their economies. Also. Bel benefited from the overall early development in the whole Western Europe while SG benefited from its strategic geographic location as a world shipping centre. Countries with differences can develop and become rich if they have good set of attributes that are required for development.

 

[Wergeland]

China has proven that non-democracy, non-white, non-Christian, non-western ideology country can achieve economic success. Which almost denies all principles USA is holding and wants to spread to all over the world. China to USA is like Copernicus or Galileo to Holy See. USA hates China for good reasons.

What China has shown is that it is GOOD GOVERNANCE and NOT IDEOLOGY that drives development and economic success.

In that regard we in the west have a serious challenge in changing our attitude. Democracy is fantastic but democracy without effective institutions are problematic.