Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hello War Professor, get this thing inside deep...
If you ever attack AP to wrest it from the Union of India, we will probably be destroyed
As the founder of Pakistan once said: We will have Hindustan divided or we will have Hindustan destroyed
Trust us, we are going to do the same, we will see how red is the color of Han blood as compared to INDIAN blood...
A friend of mine visited me yesterday who has been to China only a week back. He described china as great country with unimaginable development but excessively populated. China is in need of land and natural resources more than any other country in the world and if they are unable to arrange that, they couldn't sustain their marvelous growth which they would never like to slow down. Considering that, you can understand what is making them demand their territory back.
with India interfering in Chinese affairs viz viz Tibet, i dont see any reason the Indian airforce to issue such a statement
You failed to refute any my arguments:
"You can't stop China settled all land dispute with its neighbors but India.
you can't stop India from not resolving land dispute with any its neighbors, to have its imperialistic mentally alive, just as imperialistic british.
You can not expect Indians to vote away hunger, illiteracy."
Now admit your problem, and try to fix it. Don't find excuses for your own countryman's sake!
You democratically elected politicians suck!
and how is India interfering in Tibet?
Enough with the personal attacks and useless comments. Stick to the topic and address the issue. Any more personal attacks and offensive comments, and you'll earn yourself an infraction.
You failed to refute any my arguments:
"You can't stop China settled all land dispute with its neighbors but India.
you can't stop India from not resolving land dispute with any its neighbors, to have its imperialistic mentally alive, just as imperialistic british.
You can not expect Indians to vote away hunger, illiteracy."
Just as there are different types of communism, there are different kinds of democracy.
I see US democracy works relatively fine domestically, because, by and large, people live well. If 40% of American children suffered hunger, 40% of total population were illiterate, I'd cry out. I may move out to another country to prevent my children from being stunted. Actually, you (and other countries as well) make democracy look bad.
Now admit your problem, and try to fix it. Don't find excuses for your own countryman's sake!
You democratically elected politicians suck!
why was my simple message deleted ?? I made no personal attacks...
Jana comes up every day and claims on top of her mind sth sh**t.. example today she claimed India interferes in Tibet, which is news to everyone !!
those baseless propaganda's and flames aren't deleted but my post on advising her to worry abt her country gets deleted in the name of troll (i assumed)
Is this impartial treatment to members
Just because the Jaguar's main role was as a strike & close air support dosent make it a less potent dogfighter. On the contrary the Jaguar is rated as a better dogfighter than the Mig-21.Yes, Jaguar is an advanced aircraft to the Mig-21's. But the design concept of both these aircraft were different.Jaguars IIRC, were developed to replace the Phantom F-4s for strike and CAS roles, making them essentially ground attack aircraft from the ground up.
Stop departmentalising fighter aircraft in a singular role, it just what a rookie would do. I am quoting Air Marshal P.K.Barbora in his own words, "Jaguars where the state-of-the-art fighters then, unbeatable in any contest, but i was determined that MiG would not be the poor country cousins against them," he says. (Page-17, FORCE October 2009).OTOH, Mig-21s were a continuation of SU designs for a fast attack/interceptor/fighter aircraft - basically an air-air role - with very short legs. A comparison between a Mi-27 and a Jaguar (both strike aircraft) is more appropriate.
Did the PAF tell you that or you just thought it up in a dream?? Stop talking like a kid withought any background understanding of the situation. I can agian provide irrefutable proof from both the PAF and IAF sources about my statement. Next time know what you are talking about before shooting off your mouth first and then having to eat your words later.All the above planes are considered to be 3rd generation jet aircraft!IIRC Pakistani procurement of F-16s had nothing to do with IAF's Jaguars.
72% people from Arunachal Pradesh voted in the elections - more than the average turnout in India. We really don't need to provide any other argument. Chinese posters can continue whining about India's "imperialist ambitions", it's "castedemocracy", etc etc etc. No one cares and no one takes you seriously.
I'll just add that inspite of the whining by certain members, there is nothing that the CPC can do to change the situation. Nothing.
Baseless propaganda is allowed on this forum. How else do you explain mutiple threads on India being responsible for the events in Pakistan
Thats their prob.
India has what it wants , and wants no more.
Just because the Jaguar's main role was as a strike & close air support dosent make it a less potent dogfighter. On the contrary the Jaguar is rated as a better dogfighter than the Mig-21.........................
I won't give what you want to hear. But I will give you this instead, In most times, only money is relevant in political decisions. As far as freedom and democracy is concerned, if you have no money, your only freedom in a democratic country is to sit your *** there all day, and maybe, using fat fingers typing.
If you have a problem with CCP take it to TianAnMen square see what happens. Don't like Saudis? You can't come close to Saudi embassy in Washington per Michael Moore's movie scene.
A. Stupid American kids went out on streets in 1960'(1969)s.
B. Stupid Chinese kids went out on streets in 1980'(1989)s,
C. Stupid Iranian kids went out on streets in 2000'(2009)s.
2020(2029), India cares to try?
There is a reason why all countries are led by their elders. Think about it. If you are confused, I suggest consult your father first.
You find your own way.