What's new

China Said to Push Banks to Remove IBM Servers for Security

Mao1949

BANNED
Joined
May 17, 2014
Messages
244
Reaction score
1
Country
China
Location
China
The Chinese government is pushing domestic banks to remove high-end servers made by International Business Machines Corp. (IBM) and replace them with a local brand, according to people familiar with the matter, in an escalation of the dispute with the U.S. over spying claims.

Government agencies, including the People’s Bank of China and the Ministry of Finance, are reviewing whether Chinese commercial banks’ reliance on IBM servers compromises the country’s financial security, said the four people, who asked not to be identified because the review hasn’t been made public.

The review fits a broader pattern of retaliation after American prosecutors indicted five Chinese military officers for allegedly hacking into the computers of U.S. companies and stealing secrets. Last week, China’s government said it will vet technology companies operating in the country, while the Financial Times reported May 25 that China ordered state-owned companies to cut ties with U.S. consulting firms.

Harriet Ip, a Singapore-based spokeswoman for IBM, referred questions to IBM in the U.S. Jeffrey Cross, a Somers, New York-based spokesman, didn’t immediately respond to an e-mail seeking comment outside U.S. business hours.

“Security trumps everything,” said Duncan Clark, chairman of BDA China Ltd., a Beijing-based consultant to technology companies. “China doesn’t need the U.S. companies in the way it did for the last few decades.”

Snowden Revelations
The results of the government review will be submitted to a working group on Internet security led by President Xi Jinping, two of the people said.

Spokesmen for Bank of China Ltd., China Construction Bank Corp. and Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd. declined to comment. Three phone calls to Agricultural Bank of China Ltd.’s Beijing press office weren’t returned.

U.S. technology sales in China have come under increasing threat following Edward Snowden’s revelations last June of a National Security Agency spying program. Forrester Research Inc. estimates purchases of information-technology products in China will rise 11 percent this year to $125 billion, meaning other U.S. technology companies including Microsoft Corp. (MSFT) face threats to their business.

Microsoft Excluded
Microsoft said this month it was “surprised” to learn that China Central Government Procurement Center has excluded its Windows 8 operating system from a government purchase of energy-efficient computers. The nation’s official Xinhua News Agency called it “a move to ensure computer security.” China is the world’s largest market for personal computers.

“China’s government is in a strong position given Snowden’s disclosures,” Clark said. “If you give them an excuse, they will aggressively promote domestic brands.”

The directive would be a further blow to IBM’s business in China, where sales fell 20 percent in the first quarter. In an April conference call, Chief Financial Officer Martin Schroeter said the challenges were cyclical, “and we still see good opportunity over the long term” in China.

IBM announced in January it would sell its low-end server computer business to Beijing-based Lenovo Group Ltd. (992) for $2.3 billion. That transaction faces regulatory scrutiny including a U.S. national security review. Angela Lee, a Hong Kong-based spokeswoman for Lenovo, said she couldn’t immediately comment about the report.

In addition to concern about Armonk, New York-based IBM’s equipment as a security threat, China’s government also believes IBM servers are more expensive in China than in other regions, the people said.

Inspur Surges
China Postal Savings Bank Co. is using servers made by Jinan-based Inspur Group Ltd. as part of a trial program that began in March 2013, the people said. The government plans to expand that trial to other banks, they said.

The group’s Inspur International Ltd. (596) unit gained 10 percent to HK$1.53 at 2:57 p.m. in Hong Kong trading today. In Shenzhen, Inspur Electronic Information Industry Co. rose 4.7 percent.

Other agencies involved in the review include the National Development and Reform Commission, the China Banking Regulatory Commission, and the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the people said. The NDRC, the Finance Ministry, the central bank and the CBRC didn’t immediately respond to faxed requests for comment.

The U.S. indictment, announced May 19, led China to suspend its involvement in a cybersecurity working group and drew formal protests from the ministries of defense and foreign affairs. The State Internet Information Office likened the U.S. actions to “a thief yelling ‘Catch the thief.’”
 
. . . .
We need to keep a tight watch on US's tech companies. I work for them and know what available information they gain from clients. It will be extremely dangerous if the US govt ask them to hand over sensitive client data and information. Under federal law, they have to regardless of their corporate interest. Right now in peace time, the US will say they will never use foreign data for industrial benefit or damage other country. But in time of war, they will. The US is dirty in that way. Just a high-horse thief calling others thief.
 
. . .
.
After the NSA ans PRISM disaster the U.S. regime will look like massive hypocrites if they try to accuse China of "trade protectionism. No one but the typical warciminals and faceless bootlicker can continue to defend the U.S. in this matter after everyone was backstabbed and lied to by the U.S. regime.
 
. . . .
We need to keep a tight watch on US's tech companies. I work for them and know what available information they gain from clients. It will be extremely dangerous if the US govt ask them to hand over sensitive client data and information. Under federal law, they have to regardless of their corporate interest. Right now in peace time, the US will say they will never use foreign data for industrial benefit or damage other country. But in time of war, they will. The US is dirty in that way. Just a high-horse thief calling others thief.

Besides this will provide Chinese companies the golden opportunity to grab market share in China and enjoy greater room for innovation and development, which would later translate into greater ability to compete internationally. Very much like banning US social media trash allowed Chinese firms to grab most of the market. Now, even if they are allowed, they will have zero chance to monopolize the market.

China will legitimize its actions on grounds of national security. It is not just the US that cares about national security.
 
.
Besides this will provide Chinese companies the golden opportunity to grab market share in China and enjoy greater room for innovation and development, which would later translate into greater ability to compete internationally. Very much like banning US social media trash allowed Chinese firms to grab most of the market. Now, even if they are allowed, they will have zero chance to monopolize the market.

China will legitimize its actions on grounds of national security. It is not just the US that cares about national security.

No zuo no die, the US has done this to themselves. :welcome:
 
.



China’s Inspur Woos IBM Customers as U.S. Dispute Escalates - Bloomberg

By Bloomberg News May 28, 2014 8:09 PM ET

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-...m-customers-as-hacking-dispute-escalates.html

Inspur 32-way high performance server - TSK1


rCHe8zR.jpg
 
Last edited:
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom