Yeh go to educate yourself properly regarding Tibet, the name Zorawar Singh ring a bell? or Sino-Sikh war if you learn your history book, we were protector of Tibet way before 1950, this pretty retard to say that we invade Tibet only in 1950s.
this is why people see you as nothing but a troll,
that was a 18th century Sikh kingdom ruled by sheer Singh, not any central/east indian kingdoms who had deep roots with tibet.
more than 70% of their territory is from your "all round friend" Pakistan
And Buddhism is from Nepal, don't try to steal Nepalese culture heritage.
what a idiotic thing to say, i didn't even say Buddha was born in India, i said Buddhism has its ansistoral roots from India, when Buddhism spread it was via the Indian kingdoms, which also ruled over present day Nepal.
that aside, have you ever picked up the map of nepal? lumbini is literally at the border of Nepal ,his fathers kingdom was predominantly in India, the capital is literally at the edge, that's the reason why there more Buddhists in north- east India than north Nepal. hell his his father kosala kingdom is literally ancient bihar , the kingdom barely reached nepal.
tldr; Buddhism spread from north east Indian kingdom then reached northern nepali tclans and Tibetan kingdom.
After the 1947 independent, India claimed to sit on the throne in Asia and be big brother, Nehru gave asylum to these slave owners and Dalai just to show the world that India is the leader of none alignment and not only that it has shown the disrespect to China, and his arrogance had made him pay for India's humiliation in 1962.
lol calling the da lilama a slave owner, man you hans sure have a way with nonsentical propaganda
, he is internationally known for peace and harmony, that aside we returned the humiliation 1967. Sikkim is way more impotent than COK can ever be