What's new

China Passes U.S. to Become the World’s Biggest Trading Nation

ChinaToday

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jan 31, 2011
Messages
4,557
Reaction score
-2
Country
China
Location
United Kingdom
China surpassed the U.S. to become the world’s biggest trading nation last year as measured by the sum of exports and imports, ending the U.S. supremacy in global commerce that emerged after the end of World War II in 1945.

U.S. exports and imports last year totaled $3.82 trillion, the U.S. Commerce Department said yesterday. China’s customs administration reported last month that the country’s total trade in 2012 amounted to $3.87 trillion. China had a $231.1 billion annual trade surplus while the U.S. had a trade deficit of $727.9 billion
.

China’s emergence as the biggest global trading nation gives it increasing influence, threatening to disrupt regional trading blocs as it becomes the most important commercial partner for countries including Germany, which will export twice as much to China by the end of the decade as it does to neighboring France, said Goldman Sachs Group Inc.’s Jim O’Neill.

“For so many countries around the world, China is becoming rapidly the most important bilateral trade partner,” O’Neill, chairman of Goldman Sachs’s asset management division and the economist who bound Brazil to Russia, India and China to form the BRIC investing strategy, said in a telephone interview. “At this kind of pace by the end of the decade many European countries will be doing more individual trade with China than with bilateral partners in Europe.”

U.S. Leadership

The U.S. emerged as the preeminent trading power following World War II as it spearheaded the creation of the global trade and financial architecture and the U.K. began dismantling its colonial empire. China began focusing on trade and foreign investment to boost its economy after decades of isolation under Chairman Mao Zedong. Economic growth averaged 9.9 percent a year from 1978 through 2012.

China became the world’s biggest exporter in 2009, while the U.S. remains the biggest importer, taking in $2.28 trillion in goods last year compared with China’s $1.82 trillion of imports. HSBC Holdings Plc forecast last year that China would overtake the U.S. as the top trading nation by 2016.

China was last considered the leading economy during the height of the Qing dynasty. The difference is that in the 18th century, the Qing Empire -- unlike rising Britain -- didn’t focus on trade. The Emperor Qianlong told King George III in a 1793 letter that “we possess all things. I set no value on objects strange or ingenious, and I have no use for your country’s manufactures.”

More Involved

Now China is the biggest energy user, has the world’s biggest car market and has the world’s largest foreign currency reserves. The trade figures underscore the need to draw China further into the global financial and trading architecture that the U.S. helped create, O’Neill said.

“One way or another we have to get China more involved in the global organizations of today and the future despite some of their own reluctance,” said O’Neill said, mentioning China’s inclusion in the International Monetary Fund’s Special Drawing Rights currency basket. “To not have China more symbolically and more importantly actually central to all these things is just increasingly silly.”

Last month China’s trade expanded more than estimated, with exports rising 25 percent from a year earlier and imports increasing 28.8 percent, government data released yesterday showed. China’s trade figures in January and February are distorted by the week-long Lunar New Year holiday that fell in January of last year and started today.

China Passes U.S. to Become the World
 
. .
It was estimated to be by 2016, but now it is by the end of 2012, beginning of 2013. A couple of years ahead than expected. China's feat is quite amazing.
 
. .
America's rein as world's biggest superpower is clearly over
China's growth is impressive but it has to cover quite a long distance to come to US level. They are still ahead in many fields.

This notion that America's rein is over will be underestimating their influence and power in all sphere of life and world.

China shouldn't think that they have caught US, it should focus more on more development. I am sure China will come to their level in coming decades.
 
. .
The economy is not everything, but it is also because of economy, USSR lost the arm race to USA. :coffee:
Agreed. But one has to look at the reasons of Economic collapse of Soviet Union. Soviet Union didn't have that much reach in various markets around the world.

Wile American cars, electronics, movies, innovation from companies like Apple, Microsoft, not only kept more demand that boosted their economy, but also increased dependence of all these nations on US.

I personally feel, China should focus on capturing major markets in the world, with focus on India and Africa. China has so many competitors in various fields from countries like South Korea, Japan (electronics and Automobile giants), India (basic commodities, no hanky panky stuff), Europe etc.

Whereas US didn't face that much challenge from these countries back in the days.
 
.
Agreed. But one has to look at the reasons of Economic collapse of Soviet Union. Soviet Union didn't have that much reach in various markets around the world.

Wile American cars, electronics, movies, innovation from companies like Apple, Microsoft, not only kept more demand that boosted their economy, but also increased dependence of all these nations on US.

I personally feel, China should focus on capturing major markets in the world, with focus on India and Africa. China has so many competitors in various fields from countries like South Korea, Japan (electronics and Automobile giants), India (basic commodities, no hanky panky stuff), Europe etc.

Whereas US didn't face that much challenge from these countries back in the days.

If america is loosing the economy to china they will lost the arm race to china right? and if they lost the arm race then their position as a biggest superpower is in danger too do you agreed
 
.
If america is loosing the economy to china they will lost the arm race to china right? and if they lost the arm race then their position as a biggest superpower is in danger too do you agreed
Buddy, export potential of US in arms is way better than China. Many nations depend on their weapons. As long as China don't replace US, Russia and France as one of the best weapons' supplier in the world, China won't be able to truly project its power.

Within few minutes, US can compromise security of their allied nations who don't agree with them and are dependent on US made weapons.
 
.
The economy is not everything, but it is also because of economy, USSR lost the arm race to USA. :coffee:

Brutal, corrupt authoritarian regimes were the reason the USSR collapsed. The people eventually wanted dignity and freedom more than they wanted to live.
 
.
China's growth is impressive but it has to cover quite a long distance to come to US level. They are still ahead in many fields.

This notion that America's rein is over will be underestimating their influence and power in all sphere of life and world.

China shouldn't think that they have caught US, it should focus more on more development. I am sure China will come to their level in coming decades.

In term of technology, US is still far ahead of everyone. China first as to distinguish itself from the Russians, Europeans and Japan in technology. Once China can achieve that, than China can be mention in the same sentence as he US. Chinese need to work harder still to achieve that. And left bragging to others,

If america is loosing the economy to china they will lost the arm race to china right? and if they lost the arm race then their position as a biggest superpower is in danger too do you agreed

Yes, but all these will take time. And China might grow old before then.

Brutal, corrupt authoritarian regimes were the reason the USSR collapsed. The people eventually wanted dignity and freedom more than they wanted to live.

No. It's economic reason. Freedom is just a facade for its collapse.
 
. . .
You underestimate the desire to live life as free men.

Revolutions of 1989 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ok.. I take my statement back. People do need freedom. But this need rank lower than the basic need of human, such as food, clothing, shelter, security. Once a man achieve this, they would desire freedom and finally, self awareness.


This is according to Maslow hierarchy of needs. In poor countries, freedom meant nothing if people have no food and clothing for their family. So freedom make sense for people that do not have to worry about food for their children, only have to worry about their education and grades, like me. :) For people wondering where their next meal come from, freedom is almost meaningless as these people have more pressing and urgent needs.
 
. .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom