What's new

China opposes Indian bid to supply submarine technology to T ..

You mean embarrassing and humiliating like below:
Sino-Indian War in 1962
Casualties and losses Source:Wikipedia

India =VS =China

1,383–3,250 killed =VS = 722 killed
548–1,047 wounded=VS =1,697 wounded
1,696 missing=VS =0
3,968 captured=VS =0

timg

Casualties and losses Source:PLA Intl
India =VS =China

3,073–4,946 killed =VS = 722 killed
548–1,047 wounded=VS =1,697 wounded
3,968 captured=VS =0




timg

OK. Now tell us one thing, why the hell China unilaterally withdrew your entire troops including from the territorie (Tawang) that you claim entirely ?? I mean you had already overrun our forces in Arunachal Pradesh and here was no peace treaty or agreement as far as the world know, but someone ran back with their tail between their legs without even signing a ceasefire or peace agreement. Why so?? LOL :lol::lol::lol:
 
.
OK. Now tell us one thing, why the hell China unilaterally withdrew your entire troops including from the territorie (Tawang) that you claim entirely ?? I mean you had already overrun our forces in Arunachal Pradesh and here was no peace treaty or agreement as far as the world know, but someone ran back with their tail between their legs without even signing a ceasefire or peace agreement. Why so?? LOL :lol::lol::lol:
Logistics man, can't sustain the forces there. After we defeated India, it's time to go back to the plateau. AP was too exposed as it's below the plateau, even until today, it would be hard to defend.

So how many Chinese did you kill while retaking AP? :rofl::rofl::rofl:. You crawled back like lil black rats after we slaughtered those jawans. :enjoy:
 
.
OK. Now tell us one thing, why the hell China unilaterally withdrew your entire troops including from the territorie (Tawang) that you claim entirely ?? I mean you had already overrun our forces in Arunachal Pradesh and here was no peace treaty or agreement as far as the world know, but someone ran back with their tail between their legs without even signing a ceasefire or peace agreement. Why so?? LOL :lol::lol::lol:
Simple, China is NOT GREEDY INDIA.
China prefers to have lasting border disputes settlement by negotiation.
India preference is to GRAB land with aggression.

https://www.hindustantimes.com/indi...ang-maxwell/story-uowza4Dze80X6a8vs95TuL.html
India’s ‘annexation’ of Tawang in 1951 still shrouded in mystery

http://www.goaholidayguide.com/history/operation-vijay-goa-1961.php
Operation Vijay Goa 1961 | Attack on Goa by Indian Armed Forces

https://thediplomat.com/2017/08/what-do-the-bhutanese-people-think-about-doklam/
What Do the Bhutanese People Think About Doklam?
The Doklam crisis is exacerbating fears of annexation in Bhutan.

Even India's puppet Bhutan knows and is fearful of Land Greedy India.

With confidence and ego boosted by Indian success in easily defeating the Portuguese in Goa, India turned its attention the following year to EASILY GRAB more land from China.
India's humiliating defeat by the then, famine wreaked China, SHOCKED Nehru, resulting in his death soon after.
.
 
.
Simple, China is NOT GREEDY INDIA.
China prefers to settle border disputes by negotiation.
India preference is to GRAB land with aggression.

https://www.hindustantimes.com/indi...ang-maxwell/story-uowza4Dze80X6a8vs95TuL.html
India’s ‘annexation’ of Tawang in 1951 still shrouded in mystery

http://www.goaholidayguide.com/history/operation-vijay-goa-1961.php
Operation Vijay Goa 1961 | Attack on Goa by Indian Armed Forces

https://thediplomat.com/2017/08/what-do-the-bhutanese-people-think-about-doklam/
What Do the Bhutanese People Think About Doklam?
The Doklam crisis is exacerbating fears of annexation in Bhutan.

Even India's puppet Bhutan knows and is fearful of Land Greedy India.

With confidence and ego boosted by Indian success in easily defeating the Portuguese in Goa, India turned its attention the following year to EASILY GRAB more land from China.
India's humiliating defeat by the then, famine wreaked China, SHOCKED Nehru, resulting in his death soon after.
.
Yeah China prefers negotiations like it demonstrated in the case of Tibet and Dalai Lama.
 
.
Yeah China prefers negotiations like it demonstrated in the case of Tibet and Dalai Lama.
If you read real History, you will know Tibet had been part of China since long before India is even a country.

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com...hina-says-dalai-lama/articleshow/61775261.cms
Tibet wants to stay with China, says Dalai Lama

What is there for China to negotiate with CIA AGENT Dalai Lama?
Negotiate whether death sentence or jail term for betraying his motherland for CIA?
.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
Logistics man, can't sustain the forces there. After we defeated India, it's time to go back to the plateau. AP was too exposed as it's below the plateau, even until today, it would be hard to defend.

So how many Chinese did you kill while retaking AP? :rofl::rofl::rofl:. You crawled back like lil black rats after we slaughtered those jawans. :enjoy:

Exactly, you simply can't maintain a robust supply line and fearing a counter attack which was very well possible, did a strategic retreat. Its not because you seek Tawang, but you can't grab it simply with force. We couldn't kill any because there where none defending the very territory they claim for themself in full, what a beautiful display of courage when leaving behind everything you gained because of Shere fear, right?? :lol::lol::lol:

Simple, China is NOT GREEDY INDIA.
China prefers to have lasting border disputes settlement by negotiation.
India preference is to GRAB land with aggression.

https://www.hindustantimes.com/indi...ang-maxwell/story-uowza4Dze80X6a8vs95TuL.html
India’s ‘annexation’ of Tawang in 1951 still shrouded in mystery

http://www.goaholidayguide.com/history/operation-vijay-goa-1961.php
Operation Vijay Goa 1961 | Attack on Goa by Indian Armed Forces

https://thediplomat.com/2017/08/what-do-the-bhutanese-people-think-about-doklam/
What Do the Bhutanese People Think About Doklam?
The Doklam crisis is exacerbating fears of annexation in Bhutan.

Even India's puppet Bhutan knows and is fearful of Land Greedy India.

With confidence and ego boosted by Indian success in easily defeating the Portuguese in Goa, India turned its attention the following year to EASILY GRAB more land from China.
India's humiliating defeat by the then, famine wreaked China, SHOCKED Nehru, resulting in his death soon after.
.

Read what your friend just wrote above. And if China was not greedy, why are they still holding on to Aksi Chin?? Why don't they prefers to have lasting border disputes settlement by negotiation there, huh ??? :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
Exactly, you simply can't maintain a robust supply line and fearing a counter attack which was very well possible, did a strategic retreat. Its not because you seek Tawang, but you can't grab it simply with force. We couldn't kill any because there where none defending the very territory they claim for themself in full, what a beautiful display of courage when leaving behind everything you gained because of Shere fear, right?? :lol::lol::lol:



Stupid. Read what your friend just wrote above. And if China was not greedy, why are they still holding on to Aksi Chin?? Why don't they prefers to have lasting border disputes settlement by negotiation there, huh ??? :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:
Stupid. Read what your friend just wrote above. And if China was not greedy, why are they still holding on to Aksi Chin?? Why don't they prefers to have lasting border disputes settlement by negotiation there, huh ??? :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:
That title describe you exactly.
Any proof that Aksai Chin does not belong to China?
Even then, famine struck China sent Zhou Enlai to India to negotiate the exchange of Aksai Chin for South Tibet.
But GREEDY INDIA wants GRAB everything and never wanted to negotiate anything away.

https://qz.com/india/934720/chinas-...the-border-dispute-give-us-all-the-territory/
" That package deal entailed India recognising the Aksai Chin plateau in the North as Chinese territory in lieu of China recognising Arunachal Pradesh as Indian. Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai first offered this package deal in 1960. But this was not acceptable to New Delhi "

China was extremely generous with their exchange offer in order for peace with its incalcitrant troublemaker neighbor, as both South Tibet and Aksai Chin belongs to China.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sino-Indian_border_dispute
By signing the Simla Agreement with Tibet, the British had violated the Anglo-Russian Convention of 1907, in which both parties were not to negotiate with Tibet, "except through the intermediary of the Chinese Government", as well as the Anglo-Chinese Convention of 1906, which bound the British government "not to annex Tibetan territory."[22] Because of doubts concerning the legal status of the accord, the British did not put the McMahon Line on their maps until 1937, nor did they publish the Simla Convention in the treaty record until 1938. Rejecting Tibet's 1913 declaration of independence, China argued that the Simla Convention and McMahon Line were illegal and that Tibetan government was merely a local government without treaty-making powers. In 1947, Tibet requested that India recognise Tibetan authority in the trading town of Tawang, south of the McMahon Line. Tibet did not object to any other portion of the McMahon line. In reply, the Indians asked Tibet to continue the relationship on the basis of the previous British Government.[8]

The British records show that the Tibetan government’s acceptance of the new border in 1914 was conditional on China accepting the Simla Convention. Since the British were not able to get an acceptance from China, Tibetans considered the MacMahon line invalid.

INDIANS WERE LAND THIEVES AND ROBBERS.
FREE KASHMIR as well.
.
 
.
Exactly, you simply can't maintain a robust supply line and fearing a counter attack which was very well possible, did a strategic retreat. Its not because you seek Tawang, but you can't grab it simply with force. We couldn't kill any because there where none defending the very territory they claim for themself in full, what a beautiful display of courage when leaving behind everything you gained because of Shere fear, right?? :lol::lol::lol:



Read what your friend just wrote above. And if China was not greedy, why are they still holding on to Aksi Chin?? Why don't they prefers to have lasting border disputes settlement by negotiation there, huh ??? :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:
Bro, the point is we already proven ourselves capable of defeating you. Since China can't sustain the logistics. It was a logical step to go back to the plateau. The Indians didn't dare go to the plateau areas. You did nothing to get back AP, we vacated it and you crawled back. Until today you have never defeated China in war, and we know that's pisses you until now. LOL.

Even if we faught a conventional war today, you would still lose if your 2 papas papas dont come to your rescue. Once the Sichuan Tibet railway is ready...the logistics can be sustained.

Historically, I am not sure whether we are greedy, I just now we needed to gobble up Tibet and her dependencies. They are still our genetic cousins, you don't want the dark to spread to the plateau. Heheh

Haha :rofl::rofl: you don't put India and Technology these two words together
IT, meaning supplying tech coolies to implement and customize western software. My brother is doing the same shit, alot of Filipinos doing the same thing, just need alot of cheap graduates speaking English. That's their main advantage. They don't even own the core technology for the software they are implementing, SAP is German, Oracle is American. That's why when it comes to AI they are lagging, you are no more dependent on cheap labour, you seriously need to develop the core technology.
 
.
That's ok. You are entitled to your opinion. We like the Taiwanese - they are a slightly more civilized version of the Chinese.

The Chinese are infinitely more civilized than you people from Shitholeland. Street shitting, cow worshiping, destitute rapists from the biggest, starving shithole in the world.
 
.
That's your opinion and the opinion of the ethnic Chinese can only be laughed and scoffed at by the democratic civilized world. We consider the Chinese to be nothing but a land of beggars. The democratic world laughs at China. And If India was as bad as the filthy Chinese claim it is, over 100000 Chinese would not have begged to be refugees in India. We give you beggars food, clothing and shelter. Remember that.

Tibetans deceived by their "holy" leadership. Many want to go back, but they can't afford to, since your shithole provides no economic opportunities.

Ethnic Chinese are far and away superior to street shitting rapists.
 
.
You are welcome to SPEND your money here.
Enjoy how a clean country looks.
Please do not SHIT on the Streets.
Also advised to keep your RAPE instincts at home, we CANE and impose long prison sentences on Rapists from RAPISTAN.
Apply a LOT of deordorant while on your visit here in order that others near you will not faint or be overwhelmed by your BO.
Thank you.
.
He is used to live in shit hole india,even most of africain countries are too clean for him.
 
. .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom