China mocks India's democratic system

[Götterdämmerung]

No dilemma
All Indians know that democracy is the best choice for our country by far

Does the father who, looking at his child's eyes, tells him/her that tonight he won't be able to still his/her hunger?

 

[TaiShang]

India is a ruthless regime against the majority people who live in sub-SubSaharan Africa conditions and die in millions from under-nourishment and malnutrition.

I will not count the countless armed separatist movement that, if able to, are ready to dismantle the horrible Hindutva regime.

The Untouchables : A Nation Within A Nation

Hinduism is apartheid in the guise of religion. At the bottom of the totem pole are approximately 150 million untouchables. There are approximately 500 million people in India (if not more) who belong to the untouchable caste and other low castes (sudra castes). These people hate India. They want to create a country for themselves called Dalitstan.

There are millions of people that hate the Indian regime and do not even know it is democracy. Because democracy is a facade to sustain the Hindutva racist regime of the few.

 

[AndrewJin]

India is a ruthless regime against the majority people who live in sub-SubSaharan Africa conditions and die in millions from under-nourishment and malnutrition.

I will not count the countless armed separatist movement that, if able to, are ready to dismantle the horrible Hindutva regime.

The Untouchables : A Nation Within A Nation

Hinduism is apartheid in the guise of religion. At the bottom of the totem pole are approximately 150 million untouchables. There are approximately 500 million people in India (if not more) who belong to the untouchable caste and other low castes (sudra castes). These people hate India. They want to create a country for themselves called Dalitstan.

There are millions of people that hate the Indian regime and do not even know it is democracy. Because democracy is a facade to sustain the Hindutva racist regime of the few.

Well said. It's better to leave them alone and help them continue their delusional dreams while competent Modiji lacks some firm hands from his fellow compatriots.

 

[Azizam]

No dilemma
All Indians know that democracy is the best choice for our country by far

No, democracy in the present form is certainly not the best choice for a developing country. Democracy virtually means manipulating the public, even if it is goes against the interests of the country, to grab votes and give a perception of satisfaction to people but not the solutions for the real problems. In a developing country, combined with people who are clueless regarding politics it's a recipe for disaster. When people are clueless about politics, they elect leaders based on their own understanding of the world and in the end, the result is bringing corrupted thugs, celebrities and other unproductive individuals into power.

For the democracy to be effective, you have to remove "one man, one vote" concept and make a carefully thought et of requirements to participate in the vote in a way that only the people with a knowledge of politics can participate in the election.

 

[Echo_419]

Does the father who, looking at his child's eyes, tells him/her that tonight he won't be able to still his/her hunger?

Don't give me that Emotional BS you got a better model of governance than Democracy in India say it
Let's hear your views on it

India is a ruthless regime against the majority people who live in sub-SubSaharan Africa conditions and die in millions from under-nourishment and malnutrition.

I will not count the countless armed separatist movement that, if able to, are ready to dismantle the horrible Hindutva regime.

The Untouchables : A Nation Within A Nation

Hinduism is apartheid in the guise of religion. At the bottom of the totem pole are approximately 150 million untouchables. There are approximately 500 million people in India (if not more) who belong to the untouchable caste and other low castes (sudra castes). These people hate India. They want to create a country for themselves called Dalitstan.

There are millions of people that hate the Indian regime and do not even know it is democracy. Because democracy is a facade to sustain the Hindutva racist regime of the few.

I love when people who know nothing about the topic comment on it & srsly Dalitstan

No, democracy in the present form is certainly not the best choice for a developing country. Democracy virtually means manipulating the public, even if it is goes against the interests of the country, to grab votes and give a perception of satisfaction to people but not the solutions for the real problems. In a developing country, combined with people who are clueless regarding politics it's a recipe for disaster. When people are clueless about politics, they elect leaders based on their own understanding of the world and in the end, the result is bringing corrupted thugs, celebrities and other unproductive individuals into power.

For the democracy to be effective, you have to remove "one man, one vote" concept and make a carefully thought et of requirements to participate in the vote in a way that only the people with a knowledge of politics can participate in the election.

I never said that Democracy does not have flaws
We already know the flaws of democracy & are working to fix it

 

[TaiShang]

Well said. It's better to leave them alone and help them continue their delusional dreams while competent Modiji lacks some firm hands from his fellow compatriots.

Yes. That's the strategy I devised over the time.

1. Never engage Indians on China's own matters -- no matter how sincere they may pretend to be, they are NOT. Do not directly respond them. Do not try to correct their ignorance. They will talk even though they have no idea what they are talking about.

2. The more you talk to them, the more you will be pulled down. There is no ending in a discussion with an Indian.

3. When they open up hate threads, report.

4. Never stay in defensive. You may decide to go offensive - that's fine. When they ask a question, you ask them back. When they tell their opinion of China, tell them your opinion of India.

5. Their number will subside and they will seek and group on other threads.

6. The cycle continues.

 

[Water Car Engineer]

Out of all these pages, not one mentions India's choice of being a socialist country with a command economy for most of history?

Licence Raj - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The architect of the system of Licence Raj was Jawaharlal Nehru, India's first prime minister.[4] Private players could manufacture goods only with official licences. The quantity of goods they were allowed to produce was determined by the licence regime, not by free-market demand.

This bureaucracy often led to absurd restrictions: up to 80 agencies had to be satisfied before a firm could be granted a licence to produce, and, even then, the state would decide what was produced, how much, at what price and what sources of capital were used.

The Licence Raj was a result of India's decision to have a planned economy where all aspects of the economy are controlled by the state and licences are given to a select few. Up to 80 government agencies had to be satisfied before private companies could produce something and, if granted, the government would regulate production.[2]

Consequences

India had started out in the 1950s with:[5]

• high growth rates
• openness to trade and investment
• a promotional state
• social expenditure awareness
• macro stability

However, by the 1980s, the country was left with:[5]

• low growth rates
• closure to trade and investment
• a licence-obsessed, restrictive state
• inability to sustain social expenditures
• macro instability, indeed crisis

India basically self crippled itself because of Nehrus and the congress party's socialist polities. And it's aftermaths still need to be purged from the Indian system.

 

[AndrewJin]

Yes. That's the strategy I devised over the time.

1. Never engage Indians on China's own matters -- no matter how sincere they may pretend to be, they are NOT. Do not directly respond them. Do not try to correct their ignorance. They will talk even though they have no idea what they are talking about.

2. The more you talk to them, the more you will be pulled down. There is no ending in a discussion with an Indian.

3. When they open up hate threads, report.

4. Never stay in defensive. You may decide to go offensive that's fine. When they ask a question, you ask them back. When they tell their opinion of China, tell them your opinion of India.

5. Their number will subside and they will seek other threads.

The best strageties! I'd like to centre on my own interests, China's geopolitics and HSR.
So stupid being dragged into this kind of meaningless threads when they people just go outside and will find out the truth(maybe blind to it cause 90%Indians for these members who belong to core 10% are not real Indians entitled to full rights and sanitation).

 

[scorpionx]

No, democracy in the present form is certainly not the best choice for a developing country. Democracy virtually means manipulating the public, even if it is goes against the interests of the country, to grab votes and give a perception of satisfaction to people but not the solutions for the real problems. In a developing country, combined with people who are clueless regarding politics it's a recipe for disaster. When people are clueless about politics, they elect leaders based on their own understanding of the world and in the end, the result is bringing corrupted thugs, celebrities and other unproductive individuals into power.

For the democracy to be effective, you have to remove "one man, one vote" concept and make a carefully thought et of requirements to participate in the vote in a way that only the people with a knowledge of politics can participate in the election.

Isn't it strange that, even being functioning democracy, small countries like Bangladesh and Sri Lanka showed marvelous performance in infrastructure development, HDI, food production and subsequent poverty reduction? Shouldn't democracy claim success here as a number of authoritarian states in Asia and Africa failed miserably?

 

[Echo_419]

Yes. That's the strategy I devised over the time.

1. Never engage Indians on China's own matters -- no matter how sincere they may pretend to be, they are NOT. Do not directly respond them. Do not try to correct their ignorance. They will talk even though they have no idea what they are talking about.

2. The more you talk to them, the more you will be pulled down. There is no ending in a discussion with an Indian.

3. When they open up hate threads, report.

4. Never stay in defensive. You may decide to go offensive - that's fine. When they ask a question, you ask them back. When they tell their opinion of China, tell them your opinion of India.

5. Their number will subside and they will seek and group on other threads.

6. The cycle continues.

& yet you comment on Indian threads

Out of all these pages, not one mentions India's choice of being a socialist country with a command economy for most of history?

Licence Raj - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia











India basically self crippled itself because of Nehrus and the congress party's socialist polities. And it's aftermaths still need to be purged from the Indian system.

Indeed Socialism ruined us

 

[TheTruth]

When I came to this forum a few days ago I was a huge fan of China and Chinese people. Now that I see the way they think of us, I can't describe how upsetting it is for someone to hate you just because your country is poor. Thank you for showing your hatred to us or else I would have been a fool.

No one hates India for being poor. We distrust India for being racist against people of our race (then crying when whites and Arabs do the same to them), attacking our country and then playing victim. Indians here also constantly talk **** about China even on areas India itself is doing horribly on.

 

[feilong]

India democratic lol, you speak loud you die. You swear the local officer you will be disappear from this world forever and your family won't see your face again. India democratic because of USA feeding them, so they have to be democratic LMAO. India democratic or the regime military rule. If India democratic they can vote better regime then the Modi criminal. But it is good that Modi have give rape crime go freedom.

 

[HariPrasad]

The day when the oppressed Indians become aware of the dire conditions the majority lives, then the regime's hold on the people will weaken and the elitist-oppressive government will face serious problems.

"Worldwide, approximately one billion people live on less than US$1 a day. About 2.6 billion
live on less than US$2 a day. This amounts to 40% of the world’s population. South Asia is the
region with the greatest concentration of extreme poverty. In India, the world’s second most
populous nation, 34% live on less than US$1 a day and 80% live on less than US$2 a day.
In Sub-Saharan Africa, 41% of the population lives on less than US$1 a day."

http://thp.org/files/Hunger and Poverty.pdf

Do you have anything to do with the correct figures of poverty? Look what world bank have to say.

India's poor may shrink 75% by new World Bank formula | Business Standard News

We do not fool people by reducing poverty line from 1.25 USD to 0.24 USD.

 

[Kyle Sun]

Not one large European country industrialized and had its biggest development period was a democracy. Not one!

Nice talk!

 

[帅的一匹]

I think democracy is the right way to go, the main reason some Chinese mock India is because the low efficiency.