White and Green with M/S
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2020
- Messages
- 7,946
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
But in testing NGAD will enter service after 2030The US already has it lol
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But in testing NGAD will enter service after 2030The US already has it lol
And you're brain dead person only who invented stealth technology and have the experience to stay ahead to their opponents in terms of military technology and innovationsLol...the american are good with their loud mouth only...
You're not spreading lies and do not give backup your words with facts and purely on stereotypes??Question is one thing. But malicious lies and slander when asked for evidence which they can't provide , are not acceptable in my opinion.
How is that constructive when they have nothing to back their words but purely on stereotyping?
Finally, those questioning, are not Pakistan public but flying British flag and holding UK passport. By your theory, Sunak (PM of UK) is an Indian national, is it?
Share your sourceI just found some indicators of the WS-10 basic model found on the Naval Academy paper
MTBF 150h
IFSD 0.1/1000EFH
I don't know the indicators of western countries, can you make a comparison?
I don't think so. F-35 is in service since 2015. F-22 is in service since 2005. Generally speaking US spews out a new fighter jet every 10 years, if the NGAD is going to follow this role, it's going to come out in 2025.But in testing NGAD will enter service after 2030
Na this is not possible you forgot development phases of these jets f22 had have a development phases of 25 years and almost same goes to f35 developmentI don't think so. F-35 is in service since 2015. F-22 is in service since 2005. Generally speaking US spews out a new fighter jet every 10 years, if the NGAD is going to follow this role, it's going to come out in 2025.
Of cos I am not spreading lies. Do u have proof WS-10 engine is not reliable? I have many years of WS-10 engine in service without a single crash plus the fact PAF accept it for service.You're not spreading lies and do not give backup your words with facts and purely on stereotypes??
W-10 may be only good for China, remember few years ago we tested WS-13 but not adopted because low MTBO and TWR/service life
Share your source
Lol by Western standard WS-10 has low MTBO/TWR and servics life and PAF no other option to buy J-10C with your WS-10 which has low MTBO/TWR/ service life with comparable to similar American engines like GE F-110 or P&W F-100/ 200 series of enginesOf cos I am not spreading lies. Do u have proof WS-10 engine is not reliable? I have many years of WS-10 engine in service without a single crash plus the fact PAF accept it for service.
So what is your rebuke? Nobody start to claim China is well ahead of american in turbofan engine. So what is your issue?
Regarding WS-13 , the liar is you.
Pakistan might consider the Klimov RD-33MK for JF-17
The Pakistan Air Force is considering the idea of changing the JF-17's engine from the RD-93 to the newer RD-33MK or WS-13.quwa.org
PAF never say they omit WS-13 due to low lifespan issue or unrelaible but becos they do not want to complicate logisitic issue as they have already build a foundation for this RD-93 engine.
But moving forward Blk 3 , they are likely to switch over to Chinese WS-13 as Russia engine is unlikely to meet the future demand of blk 3.
Is one crash every year for F-35 a western standard?Lol by Western standard WS-10 has low MTBO/TWR and servics life and PAF no other option to buy J-10C with your WS-10 which has low MTBO/TWR/ service life with comparable to similar American engines like GE F-110 or P&W F-100/ 200 series of engines
Lol.. its u posting BS based on stereotyping. Do u know the actual MTBO of WS-10? So how do you know it has low MTBO compare to US engine? Even it's lower, it doesn't prove the fact it is unreliable if instruction are follow regards to the spec and MTBO.Lol by Western standard WS-10 has low MTBO/TWR and servics life and PAF no other option to buy J-10C with your WS-10 which has low MTBO/TWR/ service life with comparable to similar American engines like GE F-110 or P&W F-100/ 200 series of engines
And regarding WS-13 PAF quite happy with RD-93 performance and block-3 will have RD-93MA instead of your WS-13
GO READ THE BLOCK-3 THREAD ON PDF DUDE THAN POST YOUR BS HERE
Lol by Western standard WS-10 has low MTBO/TWR and servics life and PAF no other option to buy J-10C with your WS-10 which has low MTBO/TWR/ service life with comparable to similar American engines like GE F-110 or P&W F-100/ 200 series of engines
And regarding WS-13 PAF quite happy with RD-93 performance and block-3 will have RD-93MA instead of your WS-13
GO READ THE BLOCK-3 THREAD ON PDF DUDE THAN POST YOUR BS HERE
They are the typical sole loser. Pick the product and still complain. Nobody force the product upon them.Sounds like you are a choosy and demanding customer, and you should really opt for the best.
They are the typical sole loser. Pick the product and still complain. Nobody force the product upon them.
They are the ungrateful.If they don’t want Chinese weapons, let them go buy from the Americans.
Actually, I really want to know what is the MTBO/TWR and services life of ws-10? Can you provide it?Lol by Western standard WS-10 has low MTBO/TWR and servics life and PAF no other option to buy J-10C with your WS-10 which has low MTBO/TWR/ service life with comparable to similar American engines like GE F-110 or P&W F-100/ 200 series of engines
And regarding WS-13 PAF quite happy with RD-93 performance and block-3 will have RD-93MA instead of your WS-13
GO READ THE BLOCK-3 THREAD ON PDF DUDE THAN POST YOUR BS HERE
Lol latest version of f16 with SABRE AESA can handle any 4.5 gen jet easily
The only reason F16s were mentioned to fight against Rafales is because these F16s are Pakistan's. And they are old, merely clinging on the label 4.0. The tech gap is so obvious that no pilot skills can overcome that. For these washed-up machine, the Pakistan AF pays some $476 millions to maintain is basically ransom money or retirement funds for these Pak generals and politicians when they and their families move to their Texas and Florida resort homes.Lol, F-16s are perfectly on par with the Rafale, without a generational gap it's all pretty much about the pilot