jamahir
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2014
- Messages
- 28,132
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
Seriously, Mars is just a horrible choice. Energy matters. If you have lots of energy from say solar or thermal, you can do chemistry against the thermodynamic favorable direction, like melt rocks back into oxygen and silicon (as shown here)
If you have low energy you need energy just to survive and the less energy you have the more energy you need.
Agreed so we have three ways :
1. For lighting people are researching the chemistry-based mechanism of how fireflies produce lighting. In fact in the Dune book series there are the "glow globes" that produce light based on chemical reaction. Below scene is from the year 2000 TV adaptation of the first book :
So that takes away one aspect of an energy-consuming device.
Maybe such a reaction can also be used in computer displays.
2. The American company NDB is developing a battery that uses carbon-14 material that is waste from nuclear reactors and in the battery is enclosed within synthetic diamond. The battery will be modular in form and universal in application - from lamps to stoves to computers to vehicles to heart pacemakers to spacecraft. The life of the battery is supposed to be from nine years to 28,000 years based on the application.
3. People are researching on how the electric eel can produce up to 860 volts ! Below is my recent thread on this eel :
Backup for humanity... Wow... Ok... You realize that Mars has some big problems right?
1. Low pressure
2. Low nitrogen
3. Low gravity
4. Low temperature
5. Low energy (both chemical and solar)
6. High radiation
7. Far away from Earth
8. Materials poor
Mars is not almost habitable. it is essentially not habitable whatsoever. Without constant support from Earth any Mars colony is dead.
Points# 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 also applies to the Moon and you have been promoting the Moon.
Ok, here's the problems that are solved by balloons on Venus:
1. Equal pressure at 50 km up
2. More nitrogen than Mars, can be mined from atmosphere
3. Equal gravity as Earth
4. Equal temperature as Earth at 50 km up
5. Extremely high energy (solar, chemical, geothermal)
6. Zero radiation, Venus atmosphere protects
7. Closer to Earth
8. Materials poor in the atmosphere unfortunately.
So Venus, a hellish planet, is more attractive than Mars in 7/8 ways, and that is just sad.
Settlements on Mars now is more realizable than balloons on Venus.
You say :
But this wiki says :6. Zero radiation, Venus atmosphere protects
So I assume that some 500 meter balloon in the upper atmosphere will be subjected to the same radiation as on the Moon.Due to the lack of the intrinsic magnetic field on Venus, the solar wind penetrates relatively deep into the planetary exosphere and causes substantial atmosphere loss.
And I don't really see what one can do on Venus unless it is terraformed in maybe 300 years or more.
So Mars it should be.
Last edited: