What's new

China-India Geopolitics: News & Discussions

China can rethink stance on Sikkim, Bhutan: Global Times
l_214797_020747_updates.jpg


BEIJING: Beijing should reconsider its stance over the Sikkim issue, although China recognized India's annexation of Sikkim in 2003, it can readjust its stance on the matter.

There are those in Sikkim that cherish its history as a separate state, and they are sensitive to how the outside world views the Sikkim issue.

As long as there are voices in Chinese society supporting Sikkim's independence, the voices will spread and fuel pro-independence appeals in Sikkim, said Global Times in its editorial on Thursday.

In the past, China was worry of India playing the Dalai Lama card, but this card is already overplayed and will exert no additional effect on the Tibet question.

But if Beijing adjusts its stance on India-sensitive issues, it could be a powerful card to deal with New Delhi.

With certain conditions, Bhutan and Sikkim will see strong anti-India movements, which will negatively affect India's already turbulent northeast area and rewrite southern Himalayan geopolitics.

The Sino-Indian relationship is complicated.

Beijing is more powerful yet unwilling to face a confrontation with New Delhi.

But meanwhile, we must have enough tools to deter India from provocations.

Meanwhile, India has startling control and oppression over Bhutan, and as a result, Bhutan has not established diplomatic ties with its neighbor China or any other permanent member of the UN Security Council.

Through unequal treaties, India has severely jeopardized Bhutan's diplomatic sovereignty and controls its national defense.

India imposed a similar coercive policy on Sikkim before.

The small neighbor's revolts over sovereignty in the 1960s and 1970s were brutally cracked down on by the Indian military.

New Delhi deposed the king of Sikkim in 1975 and manipulated the country's parliament into a referendum to make Sikkim a state of India.

The annexation of Sikkim is like a nightmare haunting Bhutan, and the small kingdom is forced to be submissive to India's bullying.

After independence, New Delhi inherited the brutal colonial policies of Britain and pursues regional hegemony at the sacrifice of tiny Himalayan nations.

New Delhi's regional hegemony is boldly shown by the border face-off this time.

Using the excuse of "helping Bhutan protect its sovereignty," India brazenly obstructs China's road construction in Chinese territory.

China's construction site is near India's Siliguri Corridor, a vital path to the country's turbulent northeast area.

Suspicious of the potential threats the road construction poses to the corridor, Indian troops crossed the border to the China side and obstructed our road construction.

New Delhi's regional hegemony is swelling to a tipping point.

The country has to pay for its provocations.

The world should pay attention to New Delhi's bullying of tiny Himalayan countries.

The international community must be aware of Bhutan's dilemma and prevent India from oppressing this small kingdom.

China should lead the international community in restoring Bhutan's diplomatic and defense sovereignty.

Unfair treaties between India and Bhutan that severely violate the will of the Bhutanese people should be abolished.

China needs to put more efforts into establishing diplomatic ties with Bhutan at an earlier date as well.
https://www.thenews.com.pk/latest/214797-China-can-rethink-stance-on-Sikkim-Bhutan-Global-Times
 
Bro, if you can't post on topic on thread why do you reply.bhutan has great weather now you should take permission from Bhutan and visit someday
Seriously I don't know what are you trying to ask? Our stance is on Indian one side reporting of China bullying Bhutan and is instigator. But fact is , India project different stories. If you claim we are also faking all the report. Is Nepal pivot to China also fake? Why did Nepal divert from long time allies to China? I don't think we need an export to tell everybody what's happening?

Same apply to Bhutan case. :enjoy:
 
Seriously I don't know what are you trying to ask? Our stance is on Indian one side reporting of China bullying Bhutan and is instigator. But fact is , India project different stories. If you claim we are also faking all the report. Is Nepal pivot to China also fake? Why did Nepal divert from long time allies to China? I don't think we need an export to tell everybody what's happening?

Same apply to Bhutan case. :enjoy:
http://www.scmp.com/news/china/dipl...nd-china-can-be-resolved-diplomatically-india

Border stand-off with China can be resolved diplomatically, India says

LOL, somebody chickened out!

stock-vector-cartoon-illustration-of-a-crazy-chicken-running-544612834.jpg
 
All the Chinese members are saying No War per say; just cheap mortars with 400Km+ range fired in abundance. Ready or not, here they come:chilli::chilli::chilli:
I'm not aware of any mortar which has a range of 400Km+. Did the Chinese incorporate some kind of a miniaturized cruise missile tech in them?
 
All the Chinese members are saying No War per say; just cheap mortars with 400Km+ range fired in abundance. Ready or not, here they come:chilli::chilli::chilli:

Right,these mortars/MBRLs will fire rounds that fly over the himalyan peaks- the highest mountain range in the world.:rofl:
Peabrains.
 
Oh really? You india trespass and camp inside Chinese territories and claim its Chinese fault? Maybe next time you will claim Lhasa is Indian and try being your forward policy there?

http://m.deccanherald.com/articles.php?name=http://www.deccanherald.com/content/392828/forward-policy-nehru-govt-blamed.html

Typical Indian behaviour which acting as bully and then try to accuse others.

In SCS , our ship sail right into diaoyutai sea and Japan coast guard do nothing. US claim it will stop Chinese installation and construction in SCS and nothing happen beside some futile sail past which stop nothing.

I don't know which is the one who bluff who? :enjoy:


Let me figure it out, you bully Bhutan, Vietnam, Philipines, Japan and call us bully.

Infact your leader itself testimony what you believe,Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun.

Stop reading what communist are saying to you and read the real world news, your head may have clearer picture.
 
China should do something like that for us to reverse our policies towards China .we don't want to be the first ,but we will follow up on China's changed stance.
First causalty will be one China policy.
Regarding fueling sepratism in India they can try and expect the favor returned in kind.
China is in a pickle now.no more chest thumping will give it a face saver.it should talk to and find a face saver for itself.
 
China can rethink stance on Sikkim, Bhutan: Global Times
l_214797_020747_updates.jpg


BEIJING: Beijing should reconsider its stance over the Sikkim issue, although China recognized India's annexation of Sikkim in 2003, it can readjust its stance on the matter.

There are those in Sikkim that cherish its history as a separate state, and they are sensitive to how the outside world views the Sikkim issue.

As long as there are voices in Chinese society supporting Sikkim's independence, the voices will spread and fuel pro-independence appeals in Sikkim, said Global Times in its editorial on Thursday.

In the past, China was worry of India playing the Dalai Lama card, but this card is already overplayed and will exert no additional effect on the Tibet question.

But if Beijing adjusts its stance on India-sensitive issues, it could be a powerful card to deal with New Delhi.

With certain conditions, Bhutan and Sikkim will see strong anti-India movements, which will negatively affect India's already turbulent northeast area and rewrite southern Himalayan geopolitics.

The Sino-Indian relationship is complicated.

Beijing is more powerful yet unwilling to face a confrontation with New Delhi.

But meanwhile, we must have enough tools to deter India from provocations.

Meanwhile, India has startling control and oppression over Bhutan, and as a result, Bhutan has not established diplomatic ties with its neighbor China or any other permanent member of the UN Security Council.

Through unequal treaties, India has severely jeopardized Bhutan's diplomatic sovereignty and controls its national defense.

India imposed a similar coercive policy on Sikkim before.

The small neighbor's revolts over sovereignty in the 1960s and 1970s were brutally cracked down on by the Indian military.

New Delhi deposed the king of Sikkim in 1975 and manipulated the country's parliament into a referendum to make Sikkim a state of India.

The annexation of Sikkim is like a nightmare haunting Bhutan, and the small kingdom is forced to be submissive to India's bullying.

After independence, New Delhi inherited the brutal colonial policies of Britain and pursues regional hegemony at the sacrifice of tiny Himalayan nations.

New Delhi's regional hegemony is boldly shown by the border face-off this time.

Using the excuse of "helping Bhutan protect its sovereignty," India brazenly obstructs China's road construction in Chinese territory.

China's construction site is near India's Siliguri Corridor, a vital path to the country's turbulent northeast area.

Suspicious of the potential threats the road construction poses to the corridor, Indian troops crossed the border to the China side and obstructed our road construction.

New Delhi's regional hegemony is swelling to a tipping point.

The country has to pay for its provocations.

The world should pay attention to New Delhi's bullying of tiny Himalayan countries.

The international community must be aware of Bhutan's dilemma and prevent India from oppressing this small kingdom.

China should lead the international community in restoring Bhutan's diplomatic and defense sovereignty.

Unfair treaties between India and Bhutan that severely violate the will of the Bhutanese people should be abolished.

China needs to put more efforts into establishing diplomatic ties with Bhutan at an earlier date as well.
https://www.thenews.com.pk/latest/214797-China-can-rethink-stance-on-Sikkim-Bhutan-Global-Times

who is the author ?
 
Back
Top Bottom