What's new

China-India Geopolitics: News & Discussions

In addition to the two bulldozers, the trespassing Indian border troops, reaching as many as over 400 people at one point, have put up three tents and advanced over 180 meters into the Chinese territory. As of the end of July, there were still over 40 Indian border troops and one bulldozer illegally staying in the Chinese territory.

:lol:. Not sure what you can do with one mini bulldozer.

Does " As Many As over 400" represent 400 troops??!!! Where did you study bro??

LoL,.... We never withdrew any troop.... now hold on here's a funny story for you

Doklam standoff: China cites 2006 document to accuse Indian troops of trespassing
The stand-off on a plateau next to the Indian state of Sikkim, which borders China, has ratcheted up tensions between the neighbours.
world Updated: Aug 02, 2017 18:47 IST
default_author.png

Sutirtho Patranobis
Hindustan Times, Beijing
files-india-china-bhutan-diplomacy-army_c20f4a38-775a-11e7-83e1-68866f5cbeee.jpg

A Chinese soldier (left) next to an Indian soldier at the Nathu La border crossing between the two countries in Sikkim.(AFP File Photo)
China on Wednesday cited a 2006 diplomatic document from talks between the Special Representatives on the border issue to back up its claim that Indian troops had trespassed into Chinese territory, triggering the standoff at Donglang in June.

Beijing contended the document – a “non-paper” provided by the Indian side during the meeting of the Special Representatives on the boundary issue on May 10, 2006 – indicated the two sides had agreed to the boundary alignment in the Sikkim sector under an 1890 treaty signed by Great Britain and China.

“Both sides agree on the boundary alignment in the Sikkim Sector,” the Chinese foreign ministry quoted the non-paper as saying.

In a first, China also floated the idea that New Delhi and Beijing should sign a new boundary convention to replace the 1890 “Convention between Great Britain and China Relating to Sikkim and Tibet” that is said to have demarcated the Sikkim boundary.

Read more
A non-paper is an informal document, usually without explicit attribution, used in diplomatic negotiations. It is rare for the contents of such a document to be officially made public by either parties involved in negotiations.

The 15-page Chinese statement made no mention of the India foreign ministry’s assertion in a statement issued on June 30 that the two sides had reached an agreement in 2012 that the “tri-junction boundary points between India, China and third countries will be finalised in consultation with the concerned countries”.

India had also said that any attempt to “unilaterally determine tri-junction points” would violate this understanding.

Read more
The statement claimed that India had reduced its troop presence at the site of standoff from 400 soldiers to “40 troops and a bulldozer.”

But soon after the Chinese statement was issued, Indian government sources said there had been no withdrawal of troops by India and status remained unchanged on the ground.

“Neither has the Indian Army pulled back any troops nor has the force observed any withdrawal by the Chinese side. The status remains the same,” the sources said.

The face-off began on June 16, when Indian troops opposed the building of a road by Chinese forces at Donglang or Doklam, which is under China’s control but claimed by Bhutan.

China insists that the Indian troops had trespassed into its territory. India has said the road construction alters the status quo and has “serious security implications”.


The Chinese statement said the boundary in the Sikkim sector “has long been delimited by the 1890 convention” between China and Great Britain and even the signing of a new boundary convention would “in no way” alter the nature of the boundary in the sector.

“The Chinese and Indian sides have been in discussion on making the boundary in the Sikkim Sector an ‘early harvest’ in the settlement of the entire boundary question during the meetings between the Special Representatives on the China-India Boundary Question,” it added.

The more than 2,500-word statement was the latest in the series of steps by the Chinese side blaming India for the impasse. Beijing wants India to withdraw its troops from Donglang before the two sides can open talks.

tensions-between-india-and-china_abfc7932-775a-11e7-83e1-68866f5cbeee.jpg

Referring to the standoff, the statement said: “On 16 June 2017, the Chinese side was building a road in the Dong Lang area. On 18 June, over 270 Indian border troops, carrying weapons and driving two bulldozers, crossed the boundary in the Sikkim Sector at the Duo Ka La (Doka La) pass and advanced more than 100 meters into the Chinese territory to obstruct the road building of the Chinese side, causing tension in the area.

“In addition to the two bulldozers, the trespassing Indian border troops, reaching as many as over 400 people at one point, have put up three tents and advanced over 180 meters into the Chinese territory. As of the end of July, there were still over 40 Indian border troops and one bulldozer illegally staying in the Chinese territory,” it added.

The statement categorically mentioned that India has no right to intervene in the territorial dispute between China and Bhutan – indicating Bhutan was just an excuse for India to cross the border and stop Chinese soldiers from building the road.

“The China-Bhutan boundary issue is one between China and Bhutan. It has nothing to do with India. As a third party, India has no right to interfere in or impede the boundary talks between China and Bhutan, still less the right to make territorial claims on Bhutan’s behalf,” it said.

“India’s intrusion into the Chinese territory under the pretext of Bhutan has not only violated China’s territorial sovereignty but also challenged Bhutan’s sovereignty and independence.”

The statement argued it was India that was changing the “status quo” by fortifying its positions. It contended that Indian troops had built a “large number of infrastructure facilities”, including roads at Duo Ka pass and nearby areas on the Indian side, and “fortifications and other military installations”.

China, the statement said, has very little infrastructure on its side. “The fact of the matter is it is India that has attempted time and again to change the status quo of the China-India boundary in the Sikkim Sector, which poses a grave security threat to China,” it said.

The statement reiterated China’s contention that it would take steps to safeguard its “legitimate and lawful rights and interests”. It added, “India should immediately and unconditionally withdraw its trespassing border troops back to the Indian side of the boundary. This is a prerequisite and basis for resolving the incident.”
 
.
Does " As Many As over 400" represent 400 troops??!!! Where did you study bro??

LoL,.... We never withdrew any troop.... now hold on here's a funny story for you

D.”
Wow, so desperate that you are now arguing 400 or 400+. :lol:. Don't you think today's humiliation is enough? Go take a chill pill and swallow your pride. Here 50Rs for you.
scan0003.JPG
 
.
since the session of Chinese Warning Ministry from last 40 days, this forum has been turned into a mess.
 
.
most Indian Generals look longingly at the world map as they age....


Yes, in sigh. When they lost 2000 sq Km of land to China just in last decade without a whimper. Indeed, there is not a single bullet being fired at China-India broder since 60s, when one side is rolling over , whats the point in using costly bullets?
 
.
Yes, in sigh. When they lost 2000 sq Km of land to China just in last decade without a whimper. Indeed, there is not a single bullet being fired at China-India broder since 60s, when one side is rolling over , whats the point in using costly bullets?

That was just an internet fake news, about an 'anonymous, top IB official making such a claim'. Neither IB, nor RAW nor Chinese media have supported the claim. I don't even know what the hell losing means over there. We know they haven't garrisoned. Anyway whatever makes you happy. In fact if it makes you happy we lost 8000 Sq KM.

But you're avoiding the question I specifically put to you- if America asks you to not let the Chinese through, will you oppose them?
 
.
That was just an internet fake news, about an 'anonymous, top IB official making such a claim'. Neither IB, nor RAW nor Chinese media have supported the claim. I don't even know what the hell losing means over there. We know they haven't garrisoned. Anyway whatever makes you happy. In fact if it makes you happy we lost 8000 Sq KM.

But you're avoiding the question I specifically put to you- if America asks you to not let the Chinese through, will you oppose them?


http://thediplomat.com/2013/09/is-china-occupying-640-km-of-indian-territory/

The media outlets based their stories on a report they had obtained by the National Security Advisory Board (NSAB), an official advisory board, which was submitted to the Prime Minister’s office


As I said, you are a class A Indian troll. Keep on honking non sense, you are embarrassing yourself.


As for America, they have already asked and we said emphatic NO. and that is the reason why you seeing Chinese companies and personal working all over Pakistan. What a silly thing to say!
 
. .
:omghaha: look who's talking about being desperate...(been seeing it from the Chinese and their Media for the past 40 days) You were bloody focus on showing the 40 and 400 numbers with a official amateur document which clearly doesn't say if its 400 troops kiddo.....

:rofl::rofl::rofl: Indian soldiers occupying Chinese land for the past 40 days which has nothing to do with India is indeed humiliation for us:lol:.

here's 50, go buy a alarm Clock and set alarm for 9AM
View attachment 415685
I understand you are trying really hard to swallow this. :disagree:
 
. .
http://thediplomat.com/2013/09/is-china-occupying-640-km-of-indian-territory/

The media outlets based their stories on a report they had obtained by the National Security Advisory Board (NSAB), an official advisory board, which was submitted to the Prime Minister’s office


As I said, you are a class A Indian troll. Keep on honking non sense, you are embarrassing yourself.


As for America, they have already asked and we said emphatic NO. and that is the reason why you seeing Chinese companies and personal working all over Pakistan. What a silly thing to say!

One media outlet reports that other media outlets got their report from somehwre? Your class A jackass but you're free to believe wat you want. Sometimes it is 600 KM, sometimes it is 2000 KMS.

Earlier, in his statement in the two houses, he denied reports that Saran had said in his report that China had occupied 640 km of Indian territory.

"I would like to state categorically that Shyam Saran has not stated in (his) report that China has occupied or has denied access to India to any part of Indian territory," Antony said.

http://www.business-standard.com/ar...e-indian-territory-antony-113090601074_1.html

Emphatic no! for what? that you will let china pass through against their opposition? YOU OPPOSE AMERICA :lol:, you don't have the balls :lol:
 
.
One media outlet reports that other media outlets got their report from somehwre? Your class A jackass but you're free to believe wat you want. Sometimes it is 600 KM, sometimes it is 2000 KMS.

Earlier, in his statement in the two houses, he denied reports that Saran had said in his report that China had occupied 640 km of Indian territory.

"I would like to state categorically that Shyam Saran has not stated in (his) report that China has occupied or has denied access to India to any part of Indian territory," Antony said.

http://www.business-standard.com/ar...e-indian-territory-antony-113090601074_1.html

Emphatic no! for what? that you will let china pass through against their opposition? YOU OPPOSE AMERICA :lol:, you don't have the balls :lol:


Chutiya, READ again , and while you do it, put your reading glasses on. Those 640 sq KM was swallowed in "FEW MONTHS". The 2000 SQ KM figure is OVER DECADE time.

Ofcourse you Indian rats dont have concept of time and space. you live in your parallel universe. LOL


Go and bloody argue with your own National Security Advisory Board (NSAB). :omghaha:

If you Indian are sucking on cowboys that doesnt mean the rest of world do the same, When we have fked up their whole world order by letting China into warm waters of Arabian sea, only Indiots will not understand how Pakistan work.
 
.
Chutiya, READ again , and while you do it, put your reading glasses on. Those 640 sq KM was swallowed in "FEW MONTHS". The 2000 SQ KM figure is OVER DECADE time.

Ofcourse you Indian rats dont have concept of time and space. you live in your parallel universe. LOL


Go and bloody argue with your own National Security Advisory Board (NSAB). :omghaha:

If you Indian are sucking on cowboys that doesnt mean the rest of world do the same, When we have fked up their whole world order by letting China into warm waters of Arabian sea, only Indiots will not understand how Pakistan work.

eh Defence minister said etc. anyway I'm not concerned, assume we lost 8000 sq km

question was very simple- Chiina needs you NOW are you going to give them access overriding America TODAY...Yes or NO.
 
.
Indians on this forum are like Indt thugs. They jump into a fight without thinking.

Chinese on the other hand are like assassins, they plan and wait for the right time to attack. And when they do, the street thugs won't even know what hit them.
OK.
BTW when last time Chinese planned and attacked on someone ?

If China does not attack, we will never know how powerful India was!
Ask your grandparents, we were there in 1971.
 
.
I wouldn't call them Dragon, Chickened out and couldn't build that road in Dokalam, they are like an oversized turkey or some other flightless bird.
One of clear differences between Chinese and Indians is: Chinese like to record history and learn lessons from history. Indians, on the contrary, never care about past. India has no literal history of itself even though it is called an "ancient culture".

Indians have no concept of past and long time memory. The bright side of this fact is people tend to be optimistic. The dark side of it is they tend to repeat same kind of mistake again and again. That's the reason why Indians always look like a dumb but aggressive cock.

In 1962, Indians also believed Chinese are weak and have no ball to fight with them. History is about to be repeated.
 
.
Indian reply, "Get used to it". Chinese reply is warning number 1000000000000000000000000.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom