What's new

China hits India where it hurts

Any intelligence agency that makes it a priority to actively fund and arms the separatist movements in India can destabilise the fake terror regime and break it up. The Hindu despots in New Delhi are despised by all ethnic groups within that British-created fake country.
And they think they are entitled to all rights British have left behind, for continuing colonising the sub-contininent.
What a loser! Only show guts to the weak.
 
.
And they think they are entitled to all rights British have left behind, for continuing colonising the sub-contininent.
What a loser! Only show guts to the weak.

That whole country is one massive fraud. The whole concept is to brainwash the illiterate population with ultra nationalism from birth for the Hindu regime to keep its legitimacy to rule over the fake country. That's why a despot like Modi who is a terrorist masquerading as a 'president' got 'elected' in their fake elections.

Chinese military base in Nepal???Lol
That would be one of the most impetuous decisions that China would ever make, reason being
1) Nepal's geography: China has never tried to influence the Himalayan kingdom, for it knows that would be a futile exercise.
2) Indo-Nepal peace treaty prevents Nepal from cooperating with China without India's permission. Nepal is aware that should Nepal cross its line, political ramifications would follow.


Instead of wasting time on Nepal, China should concentrate on Uyghur region.

Meanwhile Nepal, is wallowing in the luxury provided by India and China.

Nepal already abandoned the terror regime in Delhi and now embracing China. Modi lost Nepal :lol:
 
. .
Nehru should have got the offer of merger with Nepal in 47. Another idiotic chance gone waste. And should have asked the British to hand over Ceylon. No Madhesi Problem in the North or Tamil problem in the south. Golden opportune gone waste.
 
.
China doesn't hit anyone.. India's pain is self-inflicted, like 1962 :D

Modi need to answer for this major blunder.
he will , wait .

Let us remind the Indian that they shall not bully anyone, especially giving their lack of capabilities.
moreover china must never overestimate herself , xinhua news agency is unknown to the world . too much euphoria and illusion lead to blunders and wise men never analyse past to foresee or predict future . remember the mighty soviet union ?????
 
.
Let us remind the Indian that they shall not bully anyone, especially giving their lack of capabilities.
We don't bully countries like the Chinese are doing with such impunity in the South China Sea, throwing all UN resolutions to the wind.

The question is why is China a permanent member of the Security Council when it is the biggest violator of the rule of law? For China it's the law of the jungle. We call it 'jungle raj'. :angry:

And talking of capabilities, your own President Xi castigated the Chinese forces for the lack of professionalism and training! All you guys can do is that silly 'goose march'! And a lot of corruption which is the hallmark of the PLA!
 
Last edited:
.
By M.K. Bhadrakumar on December 28, 2015

China has moved for the first time to demonstratively erode India’s ‘influence’ over one of its small neighbors, Nepal. The disclosures following the weekend talks in Beijing by the Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister of Nepal Kamal Thapa during his 5-day visit point in that direction.

Thapa received a warm reception in Beijing and was received by Vice-President Li Yuanchao, apart from holding talks with Foreign Minister Wang Yi.

Li said: “China supports Nepal’s efforts in safeguarding national independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity and stands ready, together with the new government of Nepal, to expand cooperation in connectivity, energy, production capacity, post-disaster reconstruction, tourism and other areas so as to achieve mutual benefits, win-win results and common development, and elevate the long-lasting and friendly China-Nepal comprehensive cooperative partnership to new levels”.

At a joint press conference by Yi and Thapa, the following details were revealed regarding bilateral ties:
  • Opening of more border points for transit trade;
  • A permanent arrangement for supplies of petroleum from China;
  • A transit treaty to enable Nepal to access Chinese ports;
  • Stepping up trade;
  • Start of the post-disaster reconstruction projects in Nepal under China’s pledge of $500 million as aid;
  • Agreement on economic and technical cooperation providing $140 million as grant-in-aid for repair and maintenance of the Araniko Highway; and,
  • Abolition of visa by Nepal for Chinese tourists.
Yi advised India not to regard Nepal as “a boxing arena”.

He added: “China, India and Nepal are close neighbors connected by the same mountains and rivers. This makes the three of us a natural community of shared interest. This is why China has proposed the development of a China-India-Nepal Economic Corridor. It is all about common development and prosperity. The ultimate goal is to form a community of shared future for the three of us”.

Thapa, in turn, discussed with the media (in the presence of Yi) his country’s stand-off with India, and said, “it seems we are now able to clear the air of mistrust and misunderstanding and slowly things are moving and coming back to normal”.

But he stressed Nepal’s “special relations” with China and pledged that his government will continue to crack down on the illegal movement of Tibetans between China and India and “will not allow any activities that infringe on China’s sensitivities on Tibet”.

Evidently, Beijing is cashing in on the Nepal-India stand-off, resulting from the Indian economic blockade for the past several months, with a view to create enduring, long-term underpinnings of partnership with Kathmandu.

Beijing has experienced for decades that so long as India treated Nepal as its ‘sphere of influence’ and the leadership in Kathmandu remained vulnerable to Indian pressure, New Delhi kept calibrating Nepal’s China policies.

Today, no doubt, Chinese diplomacy is operating in fertile ground. Through a series of missteps and miscalculations, New Delhi has Nepali nationalism, and, to compound matters, the new leadership in Kathmandu dominated by the communist parties has altogether spun out of Indian control.

Delhi is running out of options. A daily associated with the ruling party has put the blame on the foreign-policy establishment and demanded, “It is time for the Prime Minister (Narendra Modi) to personally intervene and lead the reconciliation efforts. Or else, China will fill the vacuum”.

Clearly, India’s ruling elites are yet to realize that the zero sum mindset is irrelevant today. The Chinese diplomacy is in a ‘win-win’ situation. If Modi eases pressure on Kathmandu, that is not going to prompt the fiercely independent new leadership there to freeze their deepening engagement with ‘communist China’, while, on the contrary, the present stand-off is only driving them to embrace China’s friendship tightly.

The backdrop is one of the mandarins in Indian foreign-policy establishment needling China constantly by butting into the South China Sea problem, flaunting Modi’s bonhomie with Japan’s Shinzo Abe or America’s Barrack Obama, and identifying closer than ever with the US’ rebalance strategy in Asia. (With an eye on China, India is inching close to signing an unprecedented treaty with the US that would provide access for the American forces to Indian bases.)

The Modi government estimates that if India joins a trilateral US-Japan-India quasi-alliance in Asia, Beijing will sooner or later read the tea leaves and reach out for a mutual accommodation with India. There is an element of bravado here, because Delhi assumes that the US and Japan see India as a ‘counterweight’ to China in the geopolitics of Asia, and have a strategic interest to build up India as a powerhouse.

This is a complete departure from the Indian policies traditionally, which had sequestered India from identifying with the US’ rebalance strategy and sought to exploit its inherent advantages as an emerging power to create space to negotiate persuasively with China.

Suffice it to say, the incumbent ‘China hands’ in the Indian establishment have been showing uncharacteristic alacrity to career away in a new direction that atrophies the bilateral track and emphasises the axis with the US and Japan. China surely has taken note of the strange, unwarranted Indian behaviour.

So far, China’s South Asian policies largely focused on self-interests – be it in Myanmar, Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka or the Maldives. China even ignored the ‘regime change’ in Sri Lanka, which the US-Japan-India axis rooted for.

But Beijing may be making its counter-moves in Nepal if only to underscore that this is a game both can play. Its decision to provide transit facilities to Nepal is tantamount to helping that country to shake off the overbearing Indians.

The setback hits India’s Hindu nationalist government where it hurts most, because it all happened when Nepal rejected the demand by a group of Hindu activists drawing inspiration from Modi’s rise to declare their country a ‘Hindu state’. In no time, as the Bible says, the small cloud, ‘the size of a man’s fist was coming in from the sea’ – and there was not any time left to go, tell Ahab to prepare the chariot.

China hits India where it hurts – Asia Times


M K Bhadrakumar , a commie former diplomat still living in time warp of USSR.

Eminent IFS officer retd Dr T P Srinivasan have been silenced him in one TV debate with clear cut points.

China doesn't hit anyone.. India's pain is self-inflicted, like 1962 :D

Modi need to answer for this major blunder.

There is nothing in here .
If we want to hurt to them then we can do that really worse .
More than that you cant even imagine,You dont know the depth of privilege and freedom that they have in this neighbour nation,If they can accept the Govt jobs ,freedom and other perks from India then they should show minimum decency that abstaining our nations name from their petty politics .So we wont tolerate dragging our nations name in their petty politics .

If India doesn't interfere in Nepal, their economic situation would be much different. You can argue they would be far richer than India given its famous share of Mount Everest tourism and shared the border with us. So India is the main actor for keeping Nepal poor to this day and a lot of Nepal youth is being abused by India elite class. Ever heard of child labor? Yup, ask our Indian elite friends.

What do you know about Nepal ?
A half Chinese in US cant answer that ,I am sure .Nepal is still living because of us .
I have been applied to a lots of GoI posts .In there there is a special category and reservation for the people from Nepal ,Bhutan and Tibetan Refugees etc .So dont force us to embarrass you .

Meh.. The Nepalis hate India... I also made a few Nepali friends at university (on scholarship - studying pharma stuff)... And all of them harbour a strong dislike for India.

Even on social media you will see Nepalis showing their hate for India and being friendly to Pakistan and China (for obvious reasons)... The way India and her media acted during the earthquake also created alot of ... for India., meanwhile Pak did a nice job by sending docs,relief and SAR teams .. :tup:


And we give two hoots to their dislike.
Pakistan is not a competitior to us not anymore.

Well said. Another article of inflaming title "China hits ...", the author definitely isn't Chinese, check.




True, that's only half of the story.

China's diplomacy in Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Nepal and the Maldives (and Myanmar, which is already in ACFTA framework) are for self-interests commercially as well as for economic interests of these nations through building an increasing integrated regional commercial network of trade & investment. Diplomacy here doesn't target any third party.

Dont worry .We are also in SCS for self interests and commercial interests .
As you said "Diplomacy here doesn't target any third party"

Nehru should have got the offer of merger with Nepal in 47. Another idiotic chance gone waste. And should have asked the British to hand over Ceylon. No Madhesi Problem in the North or Tamil problem in the south. Golden opportune gone waste.
He also did deluded stupidity even after that with China and suffered dearly .
Only thing he did for this nation was an initial democratic stability .
 
.
Nepal's madhesi people created blockade..India has nothing to do with them.
If Nepal wants to hate India , They can. But before that they should be informed that "No reservation for Govt. jobs in India".
As mentioned above by @SrNair Nepal is alive just because of India.They can trade with china.
Let them sign a treaty with china, and see the saas-bahu serial.China is the most violator of UN resolutions despite of their Membership in UNSC.
Nepal should accept madhesi...If not ....Madhesi people will continue blockade. Nepal-Tibet border crossing is not that much easy as Indo-nepal.
let see how stupid CPN deals with this.
 
.
If India doesn't interfere in Nepal, their economic situation would be much different. You can argue they would be far richer than India given its famous share of Mount Everest tourism and shared the border with us. So India is the main actor for keeping Nepal poor to this day and a lot of Nepal youth is being abused by India elite class. Ever heard of child labor? Yup, ask our Indian elite friends.
yup we are evil. But luckily now the ball is in your court make them rich like North Korea, Venezuela,Zimbabwe,Pakistan,Cuba,Sudan,Angola, Algeria, Laos, Liberia, Nigeria, Tonga, Uganda and above all formar state of Tibet
 
.
Dont worry .We are also in SCS for self interests and commercial interests .
As you said "Diplomacy here doesn't target any third party"


That's correct, we are not targeting any third party, it's commercial interests like you said, say trade, investment. It's natural since we are world's largest trader, top trade partner for majority of countries, largest merchandise exporter, largest high-tech exporter, largest in manufacturing VA, have world's largest industrial GDP, we are a creditor nation world's largest forex reserves and largest sovereign welfare funds for global investment, you know that right?

Good to know you have commercial interests in SCS region as well! Even Sub-Saharan Africa has interests here since their ships do sail through for business. You have small trade, small industrial GDP, small merchandise exports, insignificant hi-tech exports, last but not least, you are a debtor nation, no sovereign welfare fund, so what kind of commercial network you have in plan?


Sources:
List of countries by GDP sector composition - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Manufacturing, value added (current US$) | Data | Table
Merchandise exports (current US$) | Data | Table
High-technology exports (current US$) | Data | Table
China overtakes U.S. as trading partner | The Seattle Times
China leaves behind the US as world's leading trade partner — RT USA
List of countries by sovereign wealth funds - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Last edited:
.
That's correct, we are not targeting any third party, it's commercial interests like you said, say trade, investment. It's natural since we are world's largest trader, top trade partner for majority of countries, largest merchandise exporter, largest high-tech exporter, largest in manufacturing VA, have world's largest industrial GDP, we are a creditor nation world's largest forex reserves and largest sovereign welfare funds for global investment, you know that right?

Good to know you have commercial interests in SCS region as well, even Sub-Saharan Africa has interests here since their ships do sail through for business. You have small trade, small industrial GDP, small merchandise exports, tiny hi-tech exports, last but not least, you are a debtor nation without sovereign welfare fund, so what kind of commercial network you have in plan?


Sources:
List of countries by GDP sector composition - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Manufacturing, value added (current US$) | Data | Table
Merchandise exports (current US$) | Data | Table
High-technology exports (current US$) | Data | Table
China leaves behind the US as world's leading trade partner — RT USA
List of countries by sovereign wealth funds - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
And we are also a 2. 5 trillion$ economy and 8 +trillion in PPP.
SCS nations and SE Asia can find a huge markets in my nation .And we are already in there for oil exploration and will expand our presence in there with US and other SCS nation .We want those oil in SCS.

Did I asked to you about inflated figures from China ?.
Why should we care about that ?Sooner or later we will surpass all ofit .But still I wouldnt satisfied because due to large population India cant give a facilities like that of US ,EU or Japan to our people .

And we also we dont need certificate from Chinese .:D
 
.
And we are also a 2. 5 trillion$ economy and 8 +trillion in PPP.
SCS nations and SE Asia can find a huge markets in my nation .And we are already in there for oil exploration and will expand our presence in there with US and other SCS nation .We want those oil in SCS.

Did I asked to you about inflated figures from China ?.
Why should we care about that ?Sooner or later we will surpass all ofit .But still I wouldnt satisfied because due to large population India cant give a facilities like that of US ,EU or Japan to our people .

And we also we dont need certificate from Chinese .:D

Huge market in your country does sound like a good opportunity for the world, excellent! With a per capita GDP ($1,596; World Bank 2014) lower than Sub-Sahara-Africa ($1,774), i.e. lower than the lowest region across the globe, does it offers good business to the world? They need to sell to you at market exchange rate, not PPP though. Do you buy oil from Arabs with PPP?

GDP per capita (current US$) | Data | Graph
 
Last edited:
. .
Huge market in your country does sound like a good opportunity for the world, excellent! With a per capita GDP ($1,596; World Bank 2014)) lower than Sub-Sahara-Africa ($1,774), i.e. lowest among regions across the globe, does it offers good business to the world? They need to sell to you at market exchange rate, not PPP though.

GDP per capita (current US$) | Data | Graph


Why should we explain about our GDP to a Chinese ?And why should we care about your opinion?
Two decades your nation was also a sub Saharan with 64 % poverty .Thanks for copy pasting you did a nice job :
We are also growing rapidly and I already explained I wouldnt satisified because out GoI couldnt give a life that is equal to that of US ,EU or Japan even if we have a 15 trillion$ economy .Because our population is 1.25 billion
Any way r est of World are queing for an invesment in India .So we really need an opinion from a Chinese ?I dont think so .Go and give some good news to your CCP that lost a good HRS deal in India to Japanese .:D
 
.
I certainly don't agree with some of my countrymen on the sentiment of this title. It is just stupid egotism.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom