What's new

China Economy Forum

. . . .
BUSINESS NEWS|Thu Oct 20, 2016 | 9:29pm EDT
China to invest more than $148 billion in metros by 2020: state media

r

Workers clean a train car at a maintenance plant for the Kunming Metro, in Kunming, Yunnan province, April 13, 2016.REUTERS/Brenda Goh

China's investment in metro systems is expected to hit more than 1 trillion yuan ($148.28 billion) by 2020, as government planners accelerate approvals for such projects, the state-owned Economic Information Daily reported on Friday.

Since September, Beijing has approved more than 100 billion yuan worth of urban rail transit projects in the cities of Baotou, Urumqi and Xiamen, the newspaper said, adding that other localities were speeding up construction.

About 40 Chinese cities are currently building metro systems and 60 are designing and making plans, according to the China Association of Metros.

The newspaper said that, however, there has been growing concern over such projects' financing models as they tend to bring in low income but require large amounts of investment, and that the National Development and Reform Commission was encouraging governments to attract private funding.
Underestimation!
 
. .
An estimated 90% of buses in Beijing offer free Wi-Fi by the end of 2016, according to the Beijing News.

Free Wi-Fi is also offered on 12,000 buses within the 5th Ring Road that encircles urban Beijing. "Beijing has become the top provider of free Wi-Fi on buses in China," said Qiu Zhaomin, representative of the Wi-Fi supplier.

"95% of the buses within the 5th Ring Road offer free Wi-Fi, and the remaining 5% will be discarded," said Qiu.

Qiu said the Wi-Fi on buses in suburban areas is now being tested, and will be implemented by the end of this year.

To use free Wi-Fi service, passengers will need to simply download the application called "16WiFi" and register with real names.

Apart from offering internet connectivity, the application also provides real-time information of the buses including how many passengers are commuting.

In 2013, a Wi-Fi service was first attempted on Beijing's buses, but the service failed due to technology limits.

This time, the service is reported to provide daily for 500,000 people. "We use a 4G network, and the speed guarantee for 50 people in a bus to watch videos at the same time," said Qiu.

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2016-10/26/content_27179959.htm
 
. . .
From RT:

US intel agencies behind Berlin’s U-turn on Chinese takeover of German firm – report

Published time: 27 Oct, 2016 13:05
US intelligence has compelled Berlin to stop a $730 million Chinese acquisition of a Germany-based tech company over alleged concerns that its high-end products had “military applications” and might benefit Beijing’s nuclear program, Handelsblatt reports.
The German Economy Ministry announced on Monday that it had canceled its approval for China’s Grand Chip Investment Fund (FGC) to purchase the Aachen-based high-tech company Aixtron for $732 million (€670 million), citing “security-related information” that emerged. A review of the deal is pending.

US secret services were behind the unexpected decision, Handelsblatt newspaper reported on Thursday, citing sources within the German intelligence community.

According to the report, during a meeting at the US embassy in Berlin, American officers showed German government officials evidence that Aixtron’s technology also has “military applications,” although they had refused to hand the evidence over.
US intelligence officers had reportedly said Washington is concerned about Beijing’s capabilities to use Aixtron equipment or technology to produce electronic chips for its nuclear program.

The company’s equipment is used to deposit chemical layers on silicon wafers, mainly to makers of LED (light-emitting diode) chips.

“Aixtron is not involved in the design, development, or production of its customers’ semiconductor devices,” the group said, as quoted by Reuters.

The firm also added it had sold several hundred systems to China over the past 30 years in deals cleared by the German authorities.

Around 60 percent of Aixtron revenues come from clients in Asia, with 22 percent coming from the US and the remaining 18 percent from Europe, the company said in a 2015 annual report.

German’s Economy Ministry chose not to comment on Handelsblatt article and refused to disclose the “origin or the nature” of the information that led to the takeover deal being withdrawn. Aixtron said it has not yet received any questions from the ministry regarding the review.

Meanwhile, Argonaut Capital, the largest shareholder in the Aixtron, said Berlin’s decision to review the agreed takeover by Chinese investment fund Fujian Grand Chip has been “irresponsible,” according to Reuters.

Argonaut CEO Barry Norris said it was based on “highly-dubious allegations.”

Norris said the “protectionist posturing over Chinese investment would seem utterly irresponsible for Aixtron's stakeholders... and set an alarmingly arbitrary precedent for future government interference in EU financial markets.”
 
.
From RT:

US intel agencies behind Berlin’s U-turn on Chinese takeover of German firm – report

Published time: 27 Oct, 2016 13:05
Not surprised, containment of China is USA policy. Unfortunately Germans not act in their own interests but Americas
 
.
Not surprised, containment of China is USA policy. Unfortunately Germans not act in their own interests but Americas
In fact US regime tries to contain not only China but every single developing country. Thats why US regime is supporting terrorism (Daesh was created by USA).
 
.
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-economy-pmi-idUSKBN12W2QM
BUSINESS NEWS|Tue Nov 1, 2016 | 1:41am EDT
China Oct factory activity expands at fastest pace in over two years

r

A production line is seen inside a factory of Saic GM Wuling, in Liuzhou, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China, June 19, 2016.REUTERS/Norihiko Shirouzu/File Photo

Activity in China's manufacturing sector expanded at the fastest pace in over two years in October thanks to a construction boom, with smaller firms growing more upbeat, suggesting the world's second-largest economy is stabilizing and getting on steadier footing.

Signs of a more broader-based recovery will be welcomed by the government amid growing views that a housing rally may have peaked. Much of China's better-than-expected growth this year has been highly reliant on spending by often inefficient state firms as private investment languished.

The official Purchasing Managers' Index (PMI) stood at 51.2 in October, much stronger than September and the highest reading since July 2014.

Economists had expected a far more modest reading of 50.4, in line with the previous month. Levels above 50 indicate an expansion in activity on a monthly basis.

China's economy expanded at a steady 6.7 percent clip in the third quarter and looks set to hit Beijing's full-year target of 6.5 to 7 percent, fueled by stronger government infrastructure spending, record bank lending and a red-hot property market that are adding to a growing pile of debt.

The construction spree has fueled stronger demand and higher prices for building materials from cement to steel, boosting sales for related companies from engineering firms to property agents. Global construction equipment maker Caterpillar (CAT.N) said last week it sees further modest improvement in 2017.

"The significant improvement in PMI is largely driven by commodity prices," said Singapore-based economist Zhou Hao at Commerzbank.

Beijing's plans to cut excess industrial capacity and factories' need to replenish low inventories are also buoying prices for commodities such as coal and steel, and boosting profits, said David Qu, a Shanghai-based economist from ANZ.

Factory output accelerated in October, with the sub-index rising to 53.3 in October from 52.8 in September.
 
. .
A 25-year-old in China is shaking up the bike-share market

In China’s internet warzone, there’s a road map for success: find a rich backer, get lots of money, burn it to buy market share.

The latest chapter of that playbook is being written by two young entrepreneurs each offering an update on a former icon of China’s communist party — the bicycle.


In one corner is Dai Wei, 25, whose Beijing Bikelock Technology Co. cycle-sharing startup, known as Ofo, won about $100 million backing in September from investors including the venture fund backed by Xiaomi Corp. founder Lei Jun and Didi Chuxing, the ride-hailing giant that just beat Uber Technologies Inc. out of China. The funding is said to have valued the startup at $500 million.

In the other is Hu Weiwei, who received similar funding days later for her Beijing Mobike Technology Co. from a group including Tencent Holdings Ltd., the nation’s biggest internet company and, ironically, a long-term backer of Didi.

This is the trial by fire of China’s internet landscape, where alliances change in days and startups bleed billions of dollars offering freebies to get customers, only to merge months later so they can take on the next upcoming competitor.

“Tencent and Didi each picking a different winner makes the competition much more unpredictable and interesting,” said Cao Yang, Beijing-based analyst at internet consultant IResearch. “It really comes down to which founder can adapt faster and leverage resources better.”

Bike-sharing is hardly new. There are about 600 such operations globally, with a market that could grow by 20 percent a year to generate as much as $5.8 billion in revenue by 2020, according to consultancy Roland Berger.

Most, like Paris’s Velib or London’s so-called Boris Bikes are run or set up by the local government, often with corporate sponsors, and bikes are available from racks at set locations. What differentiates Ofo and Mobike is that users find and pay for bicycles via a smartphone app and then leave the vehicle wherever they want.

Each company is targeting a different market. Mobike has gone for high-end branding with bikes that cost as much as 3,000 yuan ($440) to build and have snazzy orange wheels, solid-core tires and satellite navigation. Ofo is targeting students with bright yellow two-wheelers costing only about 250 yuan that don’t have GPS and rent for just 1 yuan per hour, typically half that of Mobike. Beijing’s public bikes are free for the first hour and then 1 yuan per subsequent hour.

Mobike locates its vehicles via an integrated GPS. Ofo — so-named because the word looks like a bicycle — does so by tracking the smartphones of its riders and sending a code to unlock the bike.

“These guys all think they can be Amazon, hoping to burn money first and then make money later,” said Rawen Huang, Hong Kong-based founder of Petrel Capital, which invests in China’s internet space. “Will we look back in five years’ time and say ‘Oh my, I can’t believe they got funding at that valuation’? Probably.”

In the capital’s electronics heartland of Zhongguancun, where high-tech heavyweights like Lenovo Group Ltd. rub shoulders with startups and malls crammed with gadgets, two of Ofo’s yellow bikes stand in the hallway outside an apartment, which Dai has converted to a makeshift office.

“In the early stages of a company, expanding is more important than defending,” says Dai, echoing the insights imparted by his mentor Cheng Wei, founder of Didi. “The faster you use your money, the more efficient, the more money you raise, the stronger you become. Then you control the market.”

It’s a strategy that helped Didi beat off more than 30 rivals. At the height of its battle with Uber, both companies were burning through $1 billion a year, mostly to subsidize fares. Didi now handles more than 11 million rides a day across about 400 cities. While Didi has yet to become profitable, Dai said Ofo is already making money.

Bespectacled and soft spoken, Dai gained the support of Didi’s early investors Wang Gang and GSR Ventures’ Allen Zhu. The Peking University PhD dropout founded Ofo with four other students, ditching their original project on cycling tourism to focus on bike-sharing.

Wang was instrumental in helping Ofo find a “big tree to lean on,” securing not only financial backing from Didi, but also potential access to its 300 million users.

A 30-minute bike ride away, in a technology incubator called 768 Creativity Shejiyuan, Hu Weiwei landed an even more powerful ally. Tencent’s WeChat instant messaging app has more than 800 million users and already integrates things like Didi’s car-hailing service and JD.com Inc.’s shopping function.

The 34-year-old former journalist said the two companies are starting to “coordinate on certain technology aspects.”

In a second-floor office down a dark passageway, next to a communal toilet, Hu speaks in a low octave, punctuating her key message: “The fact that Tencent is investing in us shows that we share the same philosophy about products and technology.”

The investment from Tencent, along with Hillhouse Capital and Sequoia Capital, couldn’t have been more timely. Following Didi’s announcement it would back Ofo, users like Shanghai-based Mike Huang began unsubscribing from Mobike to get back their 299 yuan deposits on concern the company would shut down.

“It just shows you how important the big companies are for the survival of startups in China,” said Huang, an entrepreneur who has a women’s health app. He resubscribed after hearing about the Tencent investment. “Chinese internet companies are still in that phase of burning cash to win market share and the brutality of competition is even worse than Silicon Valley.”

Ofo and Mobike will need more than discounts to win users, they need bikes.

Mobike said it has about 30,000 bicycles spread across the major cities of Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, and Shenzhen, which have an estimated combined urban population of more than 74 million. It aims to stock at least 100,000 bikes for each city by year-end and expand to other cities.

Compare that with the more than 66,500 public bikes offered by the public transport corporation of Hangzhou, a city of about 8 million.

Ofo says it has more than 85,000 bikes, mostly on university campuses, and expects to take its service to other places in China. Both rivals are eyeing markets in Europe.

The ride-sharers are trying to reverse a decline in cycling in China, which spent the past two decades promoting cars. China had 670 million bikes in 1995. By 2013 it had 370 million.

For some Beijingers, the billion-dollar fight between Ofo and Mobike comes down to which happens to be more convenient.

“I don’t care whose bike it is, I’ll use one if I spot one and feel too lazy to walk,” said Guang Geng, who works in the Zhongguancun area. “Honestly I just tell them apart by color.”
http://mashable.com/2016/10/31/china-bike-share-startup-battle/#k0.EUPh3PkqN
 
.
Back
Top Bottom