What's new

China demands ‘its share’ of Arunachal Pradesh

More cannon fodder

The Indian approach is flawed. Throwing 100,000 more troops at China's mechanized military is foolish. The Chinese military machine will bomb those 100,000 Indians and move on.

India's fundamental problem is that it has no answer for China's advanced modern weaponry. 100,000 troops do not constitute an asymmetric response. The Indians need to provide the outline of a plan that would give them a fighting chance.

For example, China developed Anti-Ship Ballistic Missiles (i.e. ASBMs) to sink American aircraft carriers. Furthermore, China has tightly integrated its air defenses against fourth-generation fighters. Also, China has thousands of ballistic missiles to destroy Japanese air bases that may host U.S. F-22 fighters. That's called an asymmetric response and a reasonable war plan.

The Indians lack a comprehensive technological and methodical plan to respond to China's overwhelming military power.

----------

After establishing air superiority, it will require only a few days of "Chinese Rolling Thunder" to eliminate 100,000 Indian troops on the ground.

China's H-6K "God of War" Bomber

hoDTF.jpg

H-6K bomber

lh4hX.jpg

H-6M Bombs Away!

3o79B.jpg

Chinese Rolling Thunder!

[Note: Thank you to A.Man for the first picture and Deino for the second caption.]
 
.
nice pics bro.


but what you say is just a day dreaming. will China be able to destroy more than 30% of Indian force in a single go which may paralyse Indian defences. dont you think that before going to war there will be some indications & India will prepar to defend tis territory like 1989.

in todays senario we just need a week or less to deploy man & machins any where in India.

you got only chance till 2015-18 after that even US will think twice before attacking India.

soory nothing is going to change on the grounds. Indian & Chinese will talk to each other for next 100 years.
 
.
pranab_arunachal_20081111.jpg




Petty China can't prevent us from doing anything
 
.
Brahmos are based in AP :disagree: you know what they are used for?

Let me show you a video from 1972 of a Chinese Q-5 attack aircraft exploding a one MEGATON hydrogen bomb.

"This is a short video of the 12th Chinese nuclear weapons test. This was a test of the KB-1 thermonuclear warhead dropped from a Qiang-5 attack aircraft."

 
Last edited by a moderator:
. . . .
We will back our Indian asset. Don't worry Indians, daddy is here. The panda will not pick on you as long as you fly the American flag above the Indian skies to send a clear message to the panda that you are an American asset.
 
.
More cannon fodder

The Indian approach is flawed. Throwing 100,000 more troops at China's mechanized military is foolish. The Chinese military machine will bomb those 100,000 Indians and move on.

India's fundamental problem is that it has no answer for China's advanced modern weaponry. 100,000 troops do not constitute an asymmetric response. The Indians need to provide the outline of a plan that would give them a fighting chance.

For example, China developed Anti-Ship Ballistic Missiles (i.e. ASBMs) to sink American aircraft carriers. Furthermore, China has tightly integrated its air defenses against fourth-generation fighters. Also, China has thousands of ballistic missiles to destroy Japanese air bases that may host U.S. F-22 fighters. That's called an asymmetric response and a reasonable war plan.

The Indians lack a comprehensive technological and methodical plan to respond to China's overwhelming military power.

----------

After establishing air superiority, it will require only a few days of "Chinese Rolling Thunder" to eliminate 100,000 Indian troops on the ground.

China's H-6K "God of War" Bomber

hoDTF.jpg

H-6K bomber

lh4hX.jpg

H-6M Bombs Away!


Chinese Rolling Thunder!

[Note: Thank you to A.Man for the first picture and Deino for the second caption.]



images


:lol: :lol: :lol:
 
. .
Red army is a like dragon ,looks very scary ..but its just a myth :china:

FAIL @ 0.18 sec .....bwahahaha
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
It's not up to you Indians to decide. Without us, the panda would you eat alive. Lucky for you Indians, we both want to contain China so it's best you follow orders.

go and help koreans against north korea or help your self in afghanistan:rofl:
 
.
It's not up to you Indians to decide. Without us, the panda would you eat alive. Lucky for you Indians, we both want to contain China so it's best you follow orders.


When have we asked for your help? lol last time u sent a carrier and Russia our real strategic partner sent a nuclear submarine and u went home pissing yr pants lol
 
.
Daddy won't let the big bad panda pick you. India is our Guam.

x7nrd.jpg

Where was the United States in 1962 when Nehru repeatedly begged for help? Look at item #4 below.

----------

Four important lessons from 1962 Sino-Indian border war

1. When the People's Daily newspaper publishes an article warning you to back off, you better listen. It is a prelude to war. The Indians ignored the warning from the People's Daily in 1962 and they paid the price of defeat in the Sino-Indian border war.

This lesson is applicable today to Vietnam and the Philippines. After the People's Daily, Xinhua, and Global Times warned them of military action, Vietnamese and Filipino provocations in the South China Sea stopped.

Sino-Indian War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"On 22 September 1962, the People's Daily published an article which claimed that "the Chinese people were burning with 'great indignation' over the Indian actions on the border and that New Delhi could not 'now say that warning was not served in advance'."[37][38]
...
On 14 October, an editorial on People's Daily issued China's final warning to India: "So it seems that Mr. Nehru has made up his mind to attack the Chinese frontier guards on an even bigger scale....It is high time to shout to Mr. Nehru that the heroic Chinese troops, with the glorious tradition of resisting foreign aggression, can never be cleared by anyone from their own territory... If there are still some maniacs who are reckless enough to ignore our well-intentioned advice and insist on having another try, well, let them do so. History will pronounce its inexorable verdict... At this critical moment...we still want to appeal once more to Mr. Nehru: better rein in at the edge of the precipice and do not use the lives of Indian troops as stakes in your gamble." [38]"

----------

2. Chinese weaponry stationed across from Taiwan can be moved to the Indian sector. In 1962, China moved heavy artillery. In the current context, China can move 1,800 short-range ballistic missiles from the Taiwan sector for use against India.

Sino-Indian War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Chinese attention was diverted for a time by the military activity of the Nationalists on Taiwan, but on 23 June the U.S. assured China that a Nationalist invasion would not be permitted.[30] China's heavy artillery facing Taiwan could then be moved to Tibet.[31] It took China six to eight months to gather the resources needed for the war, according to Anil Athale, author of the official Indian history.[31] The Chinese sent a large quantity of non-military supplies to Tibet through the Indian port of Calcutta.[31]"

----------

3. PLA's blitzkrieg will slice through the enemy's best troops.

Sino-Indian War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Marshal Liu Bocheng headed a group to determine the strategy for the war. He concluded that the opposing Indian troops were among India's best, and to achieve victory would require deploying crack troops and relying on force concentration to achieve decisive victory. On 16 October, this war plan was approved, and on the 18th, the final approval was given by the Politburo for a "self-defensive counter-attack", scheduled for 20 October.[2]
...
At 5:14 am, Chinese mortar fire began attacking the Indian positions. Simultaneously, the Chinese cut the Indian telephone lines, preventing the defenders from making contact with their headquarters. At about 6:30 am, the Chinese infantry launched a surprise attack from the rear and forced the Indians to leave their trenches.[36]

The Chinese troops overwhelmed the Indians in a series of flanking manoeuvres south of the McMahon Line and prompted their withdrawal from Namka Chu.[36] Fearful of continued losses, Indian troops escaped into Bhutan. Chinese forces respected the border and did not pursue.[7] Chinese forces now held all of the territory that was under dispute at the time of the Thag La confrontation, but they continued to advance into the rest of NEFA.[36]
...
Western theatre

On the Aksai Chin front, China already controlled most of the disputed territory. Chinese forces quickly swept the region of any remaining Indian troops.[42] Late on 19 October, Chinese troops launched a number of attacks throughout the western theatre.[8] By 22 October, all posts north of Chushul had been cleared.[8]"

----------

4. In 1962, the United States rejected India's plea for military jets. Today, China is a well-armed thermonuclear power. What are the chances that the United States would be willing to supply India with a single bullet in the next Sino-Indian border war?

Sino-Indian War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Involvement of other nations

During the conflict, Nehru wrote two desperate letters to JFK, requesting 12 squadrons of fighter jets. These jets were necessary to beef up Indian air strength so that an air war could be initiated safely from the Indian perspective. This request was rejected. According to former Indian diplomat G Parthasarathy, "only after we got nothing from the US did arms supplies from the Soviet Union to India commence." [57] In 1962, President of Pakistan Ayub Khan made clear to India that Indian troops could safely be transferred from the Pakistan frontier to the Himalayas.[58]"
 
.
When have we asked for your help? lol last time u sent a carrier and Russia our real strategic partner sent a nuclear submarine and u went home pissing yr pants lol

You don't need to ask. When we say it's time it's time. We already control the Indian ocean. Like I said, it's not up to you Indians to decide. We make the rules, not you.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom