China defends Pak, says it is at frontlines of anti-terror fight

[Chellam]

Country creates 15000 Strong Troops Against their own People for Safety of Foreigners, so call frontlines of anti terror fight

 

[SBUS-CXK]

Pakistan is a customer of American weapons since the 50s but it's not stopped them from using he haqqani network against American troops.

This is the difference between the political philosophy of China and US. Have you ever heard of China interfering in the internal affairs of Pakistan?

 

[Taimoor Khan]

Great, and you know what, we are more than happy with Pakistan's and China's support to guy's like Masood Azhar and Sayeed Salahudeen. You know why ??

We are fighting Pakistan's war in Kashmir and if it withdraws its support, the war would be fought inside Pakistan.

Do you know who said so. LOL

http://nation.com.pk/national/09-Jun-2012/ujc-warns-of-war-inside-pakistan/

Ofcourse comprehension problem is always an issue with Indians. What he is saying is similar to what happened in Afghanistan when Pakistan under the appeasement to America gave away turf to the likes of India and the result was fighting and terrorism brought right into our lands. If we put our foot off the gas in Indian occupied Kashmir, AJK will come under Indian terrorism pretty soon.

So when are you bringing his case to UN to designate him as "global" terrorist? The subsequent statement by GOP is as close diplomatically as showing middle finger to this American-Indian statement. Infact people have already forgotten and now American state department has rushed to do the damage limitation.

https://www.dawn.com/news/1342525/no-change-in-kashmir-policy-says-us

No change in Kashmir policy, says US

 

[Tom M]

Ofcourse comprehension problem is always an issue with Indians. What he is saying is similar to what happened in Afghanistan when Pakistan under the appeasement to America gave away turf to the likes of India and the result was fighting and terrorism brought right into our lands. If we put our foot off the gas in Indian occupied Kashmir, AJK will come under Indian terrorism pretty soon.

So when are you bringing his case to UN to designate him as "global" terrorist? The subsequent statement by GOP is as close diplomatically as showing middle finger to this American-Indian statement. Infact people have already forgotten and now American state department has rushed to do the damage limitation.

https://www.dawn.com/news/1342525/no-change-in-kashmir-policy-says-us

No change in Kashmir policy, says US

Exactly what we want. NO CHANGE IN KASHMIR POLICY. Simply put it's status quo ante bellum.

Regarding Syed Salahuddin and the likes, keep on appeasing them, it's always in the better interest of India, which you will never understand. LOL

 

[Taimoor Khan]

Exactly what we want. NO CHANGE IN KASHMIR POLICY. Simply put it's status quo ante bellum.

Regarding Syed Salahuddin and the likes, keep on appeasing them, it's always in the better interest of India, which you will never understand. LOL

As long as all including America understand that Kashmir is disputed territory not attot ang of India, we are ok. We will resolve kashmir dispute on our strength with our regional partner.
I think we are agreeing in a strange way the recent American-Indian statement and branding Salahudeen as "global" terrorist means jack shit.
BTW, senator maccain is in Pakistan as we speak, obviously Americans have screwed this up and now trying to do damage limitations.

Enjoy.

 

[wiseone2]

This is the difference between the political philosophy of China and US. Have you ever heard of China interfering in the internal affairs of Pakistan?

If a Pakistani political party was to sign a peace treaty with India do not tell me China would not try to torpedo it
If a Pakistani political party was to nationalize all CPEC assets what would China do ?

 

[Tom M]

As long as all including America understand that Kashmir is disputed territory not attot ang of India, we are ok. We will resolve kashmir dispute on our strength with our regional partner.
I think we are agreeing in a strange way the recent American-Indian statement and branding Salahudeen as "global" terrorist means jack shit.
BTW, senator maccain is in Pakistan as we speak, obviously Americans have screwed this up and now trying to do damage limitations.

Enjoy.

As long as the dispute is bilateral, no matter how many regional partners you may involve, Kashmir is not going anywhere. And everyone including your regional partner accept the fa, it's a bilateral issue.

 

[AbdullahKamal]

Modi try to colluding with USA to realize his wet dream, no way!

China will always support Pakistan to smash India's aspiration.

And we stand by with China

 

[帅的一匹]

If a Pakistani political party was to sign a peace treaty with India do not tell me China would not try to torpedo it
If a Pakistani political party was to nationalize all CPEC assets what would China do ?

Time to wake up from your day dream

 

[wiseone2]

Time to wake up from your day dream

you dodged the question

If a Pakistani political party was to sign a peace treaty with India do not tell me China would not try to torpedo it
If a Pakistani political party was to nationalize all CPEC assets what would China do ?

 

[帅的一匹]

you dodged the question

If a Pakistani political party was to sign a peace treaty with India do not tell me China would not try to torpedo it
If a Pakistani political party was to nationalize all CPEC assets what would China do ?

Which Pakistani political party will sign a peace treaty with India? Name it

 

[wiseone2]

Which Pakistani political party will sign a peace treaty with India? Name it

It is irrelevant

 

[Taimoor Khan]

As long as the dispute is bilateral, no matter how many regional partners you may involve, Kashmir is not going anywhere. And everyone including your regional partner accept the fa, it's a bilateral issue.

Ofcourse wars are bilateral issues, mostly. We understand Kashmir will settle on the battlefield. We are better off without any randi rona of India and her western allies, just like it happened in Kargil. We can surely do without this nuisance.

Bottom line is, all understand that this is a disputed territory and if it triggers another war, so be it. India cannot claim any moral high grounds about a war fought over a disputed land.

 

[Tom M]

Ofcourse wars are bilateral issues, mostly. We understand Kashmir will settle on the battlefield. We are better off without any randi rona of India and her western allies, just like it happened in Kargil. We can surely do without this nuisance.

Bottom line is, all understand that this is a disputed territory and if it triggers another war, so be it. India cannot claim any moral high grounds about a war fought over a disputed land.

Well you had tried that in the past as well, then why you had to accept ceasefire unconditionally each time ?? Because you had moral high ground while fighting for a disputed territory ?? LOL

To put it simple. You can't do a jack. Neither on the battlefield nor on the negotiations table. It will be the status quo ante bellum unless one of the two countries disintegrate into smaller ones (highly unlikely) or one is ready to give up on the claim (never gonna happen in near future).

 

[Taimoor Khan]

Well you had tried that in the past as well, then why you had to accept ceasefire unconditionally each time ?? Because you had moral high ground while fighting for a disputed territory ?? LOL

To put it simple. You can't do a jack. Neither on the battlefield nor on the negotiations table. It will be the status quo ante bellum unless one of the two countries disintegrate into smaller ones (highly unlikely) or one is ready to give up on the claim (never gonna happen in near future).

We have actually got the monkey back our shoulders this time around. It's the yanks I am talking about. They have always pressurised Pakistan in its conflicts with India, in India favour. The last of which was Kargil. With our western front more or less secure and yanks made limp in Afghanistan, time is ripe to sort Indian problem in Kashmir.

It's never been you who have been the problem, it's your Zionist allies in America who have thrown spanner in the works of Pakistan.