What's new

China Civilian Nuclear Industry, Technology, Exports and Supply Chain: News & Discussions

Nice. Hope to see more rapid development in nuclear energy in the future after China joins in.

That's great news but I'm curious if Japan also have DCS why did Fukushima happened?

AFAIK, Fukushima's nuclear plant was built in the 1960s with outdated technology. And unfortunately, adding to that they had an earthquake and tsunami wrecking it simultaneously.
 
Nice. Hope to see more rapid development in nuclear energy in the future after China joins in.



AFAIK, Fukushima's nuclear plant was built in the 1960s with outdated technology. Adding to that they had an earthquake and tsunami wrecking it simultaneously.

That is true. I did read that the Fuku nuclear power plants were third generation ones. I supposed the DCS is for current and future nuclear power plants.
 
That is true. I did read that the Fuku nuclear power plants were third generation ones. I supposed the DCS is for current and future nuclear power plants.

They are using Generation II reactors. The latest are the Generation III reactors, and the Generation IV reactors are being researched now to be used commercially in the future.


Generation IV reactors (Gen IV) are a set of nuclear reactor designs currently being researched for commercial applications. Most of these designs, with the exception of the BN-1200 reactor, are generally not expected to be available for commercial construction before 2030–40. Presently the majority of reactors in operation around the world are considered second generation reactor systems, as the vast majority of the first-generation systems were retired some time ago, and there are only a dozen or so Generation III reactors in operation (2014).
 
Not really. In terms of warship, it's mostly indigenous from 071 LDP, 056 corvette and Type052D destroyer. While air force of J-10, JF-17 and J-20. It's more like a 50/50 percent and mostly external appearance looks like but inside is totally different from any soviet era setup.

It does not contradict my point nor urs. It was developed. Or put it this way. Evolved from Soviet designs into Chinese designs and modifications.
 
Chinese I&C system passes IAEA review
15 July 2016

A Chinese-developed digital instrumentation and control (I&C) system for nuclear power plants recently passed an independent review by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).


FirmSys%20-%20460%20%28CGN%29.JPG

The FirmSys safety I&C system (Image: CGN)

At a press conference held in Beijing on 13 July, China General Nuclear (CGN) spokesman Huang Xiaofei announced that the FirmSys digital I&C system developed by its Beijing CTEC System Engineering Co Ltd subsidiary had successfully completed an IAEA Independent Engineering Review of Instrumentation and Control Systems (IERICS). He said this marks a major milestone for China's equipment manufacturing sector.

The IAEA began its review of the FirmSys I&C system in June 2015 and a three-day pre-assessment was completed last November. In April, an IAEA expert mission completed an eight-day on-site review. The IERICS team has examined the system's platform architecture, security features, hardware, software, communications, testing and validation process and other system applications.

The IAEA team concluded that FirmSys meets IAEA Safety Standard requirements.

The company described the system as the "nerve centre" of a nuclear power plant, capable of controlling more than 260 plant systems running nearly 10,000 pieces of equipment and process conditions. It plays an important role in the safe, reliable and stable operation of nuclear power plants, it said.

CTEC officially launched research and development of nuclear-grade digital control systems in 2007. The company released its first nuclear digital I&C system - FirmSys - in 2010. In September 2011, CTEC commissioned Germany's Institute for Safety Technology (ISTec) - a subsidiary of independent testing service provider TÜV Rheinland - to carry out independent verification and validation of the FirmSys platform. In November 2014, ISTec confirmed the FirmSys system meets international standards for use in nuclear power plant I&C systems.

According to CGN, FirmSys has already been used in the upgrades of several of China's operating plants and in the construction of new units. It is currently being installed at units 5 and 6 of the Yangjiang plant, as well as units 5 and 6 of the Hongyanhe plant. It has also been specified for use in the demonstration Hualong One units at Fangchenggang units 3 and 4 and the ACPR1000 reactors at Tianwan units 5 and 6. In addition, the system is also to be used in the demonstration HTR-PM high-temperature gas-cooled reactors at Shidaowan.

CGN said China is now the fourth country - after the USA, France and Japan - to be able to supply such systems.

The company estimates that installation of its system in a Chinese plant would cost about CNY 300 million ($45 million) less than a comparable imported system.

Researched and written
by World Nuclear News


http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/C-Chinese-IC-system-passes-IAEA-review-1507164.html
 
August 04, 2016

FOREIGN201608041741000425888139784.jpg


China Nuclear Engineering Group Corporation (CNEC) has signed a cooperation agreementwith an Indonesian nuclear enterprise to promote the 4th generation of High TemperatureGas-Cooled Reactors (HTGR) on Monday, according to the official website of CNEC.

Wang Shoujun, chairman of CNEC, signed the agreement on Aug. 1 with Djarot SulistioWisnubroto, chairman of Indonesia's National Nuclear Energy Agency (BATAN), to jointlydevelop HTGRs and train professionals. The agreement was signed during the secondofficial Meeting of Cultural and People-to-People Exchange between China and Indonesia.

In order to better understand the Indonesian market, Wang visited BATAN in June, atwhich point the two parties reached a consensus about the issue.

To meet increasing demands for electricity, Indonesia aims to construct large light waterreactors in populated areas including Java, Bali, Madura Island and Sumatra, and toconstruct small HTGRs on Kalimantan and Sulawesi starting from 2027. Before thecommercial-use reactors, Indonesia plans to construct HTGRs for experimental use. Thefirst HTGR is scheduled to start construction in 2017

Besides Indonesia, CNEC has entered negotiations with various countries and regionsincluding Pakistan, Djibouti, Brazil, Saudi Arab and ASEAN countries to promote HTGR.Wang said that the global spread of HTGR shows CNEC's ambition to become an owner ofnuclear power rather than just a builder of nuclear power stations.
 
UK ties with China at risk over nuclear plant deal
Home / World / UK ties with China at risk over nuclear plant deal
By AFP
August 07, 2016
Latest : World
  • 10
  • 0
l_140792_052614_updates.gif



LONDON: Britain´s decision to delay final approval for the Hinkley Point nuclear power plant risks cooling relations with economic powerhouse China under new prime minister Theresa May, analysts say.

May´s predecessor David Cameron, who quit after the June referendum vote to leave the European Union, made strong ties with Beijing central to his economic policy.

During a state visit last year, Britain rolled out the red carpet for Chinese President Xi Jinping as it sought to attract investment to its austerity-hit economy.

Cameron said Britain would be China´s "best partner in the West" as they signed £40 billion (47 billion euros, $53 billion) of deals, including Beijing taking a £6 billion stake in Hinkley Point, Britain´s first new nuclear plant in a generation.

A ceremony to sign the £18 billion Hinkley Point deal was planned for July 29, the day after the other player in the deal, French energy giant EDF, finally approved the project which had deeply divided its top management as critics fear it could bankrupt the French utility.

However, the French government, which owns 85 percent of EDF, has been doggedly determined to get Hinkley Point approved as it sees the project as crucial for the long-term viability of France´s nuclear industry.

But Britain´s new leader May, who took power on July 13, had already decided to delay the final decision on the project, which is now expected in September.

There are questions over whether the delay could jeopardise ties between Britain and China, the world´s second biggest economy, at a time when London will need to build strong trade links post-Brexit.

Chinese state media reacted to the delay by saying it "adds uncertainties to the ´Golden Era´ of China-UK ties".

Beijing "cannot tolerate" any accusation that its investment would threaten British national security, the official Xinhua news agency said.

While it is still unclear whether May, a former home secretary, will scrap or approve the project, her joint chief of staff has previously made his scepticism clear.

Howard Wheeldon, a defence and strategic analyst with his own consultancy, predicted the delay "probably marks the end of the scheme as we have come to know it."

"We just cannot afford to take such a massive, costly and -- given that it will only supply seven percent of the UK´s electricity needs -- unnecessary risk," he said.

The prime minister´s official spokeswoman insisted the government would "continue to seek a strong relationship with China" and needed a "reliable and secure energy supply".

But with May´s government shaking off much of Cameron´s economic legacy -- signalling a less hardline approach to austerity and introducing a new industrial strategy -- the options look wide open.
 
ChinaNuclearAmbitions-29a4b.jpg

FILE - In this June 10, 2005 file photo, workers walk past a part of the Qinshan No. 2 Nuclear Power Plant, China’s first self-designed and self-built national commercial nuclear power plant in Qinshan, about 125 kilometers (about 90 miles) southwest of Shanghai, China. Beijing’s wants to compete with the United States, France and Russia as an exporter of atomic power technology. (Eugene Hoshiko, File/Associated Press)
By Joe McDonald | AP August 24 at 6:33 AM
BEIJING — On a seaside field south of Shanghai, workers are constructing a nuclear reactor that is the flagship for Beijing’s ambition to compete with the United States, France and Russia as an exporter of atomic power technology.

The Hualong One, developed by two state-owned companies, is one multibillion-dollar facet of the Communist Party’s aspirations to transform China into a creator of profitable technology from mobile phones to genetics.

Still, experts say Beijing underestimates how tough it will be for its novice nuclear exporters to sell abroad. They face political hurdles, safety concerns and uncertain global demand following Japan’s Fukushima disaster.

China’s government-run nuclear industry is based on foreign technology but has spent two decades developing its own with help from Westinghouse Electric Co., France’s Areva and EDF and other partners. A separate export initiative is based on an alliance between Westinghouse and a state-owned reactor developer.

The industry is growing fast, with 32 reactors in operation, 22 being built and more planned, according to the World Nuclear Association, an industry group. China accounted for eight of 10 reactors that started operation last year and six of eight construction starts.


Abroad, builders broke ground in Pakistan last year for a power plant using a Hualong One, supported by a $6.5 billion Chinese loan. Also last year, Argentina signed a contract to use the reactor in a $15 billion plant financed by Chinese banks.

Sales come with financing from state banks, a model that helped Chinese companies break into the market for building highways and other public works in Africa and the Middle East. State-owned companies also are lining up to invest in nuclear power plants in Britain and Romania.

“This is generating significant build-up of skills and industrial experience,” said Mycle Schneider, a nuclear energy consultant in Paris, in an email.

Still, Beijing is “seriously underestimating” how hard global sales will be, said Schneider. He said obstacles include strict quality controls, regulations that differ from country to country and competition from the falling cost of wind and solar.
“There is simply no market out there,” said Schneider.

At home, Beijing faces public unease about nuclear power following an avalanche of industrial accidents and product safety scandals.

This month, thousands of residents of Lianyungang, north of Shanghai, protested after rumors spread that a facility to process nuclear waste might be built there. Authorities said the city, home to one of China’s biggest nuclear power plants, was only one of several being considered. After more protests, they announced the search for a site was suspended.


Overseas, China’s nuclear companies face questions over their status as arms of the state.

British Prime Minister Theresa May ordered a security review of plans to allow China General Nuclear Power Corp. to become a minority investor in the planned Hinkley Point C power station being built by EDF.

In response, China’s ambassador to London wrote in The Financial Times newspaper that a delay might harm official ties.

The Hualong One under construction in Fuqing, near the southeastern city of Fuzhou, is a hybrid created by CGN and its main rival, China National Nuclear Corp., after they were ordered in 2011 to merge two competing reactors into a single export product.

Based on French systems of the 1970s and ‘80s, it belongs to the industry’s third generation of reactors, with more advanced safety features and working life of 60 years instead of the previous generation’s 40.

CNNC is installing two Hualong One reactors at the Fuqing Nuclear Power Plant, due to go online in 2019 and 2020. The power station also has two Areva units and is building two more.

CGN is building its own version in Fangchenggang on the southern coast near Vietnam and says it wants to seek British regulatory approval of the Hualong One design for possible use in a power plant in Bradwell on Britain’s east coast.

China’s nuclear industry has yet to report a major accident but reflexive official secrecy makes it hard for outsiders to assess its safety.

Changes in Chinese-designed models based on foreign technology, such as making reactors bigger while using cooling techniques for smaller units, “raise questions about safety and the good judgment of Chinese reactor engineers,” said Edward Lyman, a nuclear power specialist for the Union of Concerned Scientists in Washington, in an email.

“It is crucial for countries importing Chinese nuclear technology to rigorously conduct their own oversight over the products they are buying,” Lyman said.

China’s first commercial nuclear plant went online in 1991 in Qinshan, south of Shanghai in Zhejiang province. Over the next decade, Beijing tested competing technologies by buying reactors from U.S., Russian, French and other suppliers.

Chinese companies couldn’t export models they developed because foreign companies owned the underlying technology.

So last year, Beijing declared nuclear power one of 16 “national science and technology projects,” with generous financial support to develop homegrown know-how.

The ruling party’s latest five-year development plan calls for China to have 58 gigawatts of nuclear generating capacity by 2020 and another 30 gigawatts under construction. By 2030, it wants 120 to 150 gigawatts of nuclear capacity supplying 8 to 10 percent of China’s power.

China’s status as an important market for global suppliers gives Beijing leverage in acquiring technology. Westinghouse, which was acquired by Japan’s Toshiba Corp. in 2006, Areva and France’s EDF have had partnerships with Chinese researchers since the early 1990s.

“I see them as customers, competitors and partners,” said Jeff Benjamin, Westinghouse’s senior vice president for new plants and major projects.

Other global suppliers include GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy, South Korea’s KEPCO, Canada’s Candu Energy Inc. and Russia’s Atomstroyexport.

Westinghouse transferred technology for its latest reactor, the AP1000, to China’s State Nuclear Power Technology Corp. in 2007 as part of a transaction that included the sale of four reactors.

The AP1000 became the basis for future Chinese reactor development and Westinghouse agreed to sell reactors with SNPTC. The Chinese partner, which merged with another state company to form the State Power Investment Corp. last year, also developed its own, bigger version, the CAP1400.

The two companies are in talks with Turkey about selling four reactors based on the AP1000.

The AP1000 has been approved by U.S. and British regulators, Benjamin said, while the CAP1400 is just beginning the review process.

“We look forward to participating in the China market for many years to come,” he said. Abroad, “there will be markets either SPIC on their own or Westinghouse on our own might not have access to, but together we can gain access.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...ed163a-69af-11e6-91cb-ecb5418830e9_story.html
 
UK confirms Chinese-funded Hinkley nuclear project with "new agreement"
2016-09-15 15:33:16 Xinhua Web Editor: Fei Fei

d3f8bdc53b3a4dd5bbeec6e8e41ddec6.jpg

A photo taken on November 12, 2013 shows the front of Hinkley Point, a nuclear power station near Bridgwater in Somerset, England. [Photo: CFP]

The UK government on Thursday said that it had confirmed the Hinkley Point C nuclear power plant will go ahead following a new agreement with French company EDF.

The latest move came two months after the new government called for a review of the nuclear program.

British Secretary of State for Business Greg Clark said in a statement that the government had decided to give the green light to the country's first nuclear power plant in two decades but added that new measures would be taken to enhance security.

The Hinkley Point C plant, to be co-built by China General Nuclear Power Corp., which has a one-third stake, and French state-owned company EDF, would help address Britain's future energy demands.
 
UK confirms Chinese-funded Hinkley nuclear project with "new agreement"
2016-09-15 15:33:16 Xinhua Web Editor: Fei Fei

View attachment 334659
A photo taken on November 12, 2013 shows the front of Hinkley Point, a nuclear power station near Bridgwater in Somerset, England. [Photo: CFP]

The UK government on Thursday said that it had confirmed the Hinkley Point C nuclear power plant will go ahead following a new agreement with French company EDF.

The latest move came two months after the new government called for a review of the nuclear program.

British Secretary of State for Business Greg Clark said in a statement that the government had decided to give the green light to the country's first nuclear power plant in two decades but added that new measures would be taken to enhance security.

The Hinkley Point C plant, to be co-built by China General Nuclear Power Corp., which has a one-third stake, and French state-owned company EDF, would help address Britain's future energy demands.
Good. Reassuring to know that my PC will be powered up by Chinese Nuclear technology and finance.
 
I think there were sanctions on China about Nuclear cooperation.
 
This news article from BBC, the British point of view.

--------
Hinkley Point: UK approves nuclear plant deal
15 September 2016

_88738497_88738496.jpg

Artist's impression of Hinkley Point C building proposals


The government has approved a new £18bn nuclear power station in the UK after imposing "significant new safeguards" to protect national security.

The new plant at Hinkley Point in Somerset is being financed by the French and Chinese governments.

However, the UK government says it will have control over foreign investment in "critical infrastructure".

Ministers will be able to stop EDF, the state-controlled French energy firm, from selling its stake in Hinkley.

Jean-Bernard Lévy, chief executive of EDF, which is building the plant, said: "The decision of the British Government to approve the construction of Hinkley Point C marks the relaunch of nuclear in Europe."

Critics of the deal have warned of escalating costs and the implications of allowing nuclear power plants to be built in the UK by foreign governments.

EDF is funding two-thirds of the project, which will create more than 25,000 jobs, with China investing the remaining £6bn.

The Chinese agreed to take a stake in Hinkley, which will meet 7% of Britain's electricity needs, and to develop a new nuclear power station at Sizewell in Suffolk on the understanding that the UK government would approve a Chinese-led and designed project at Bradwell in Essex. That decision has raised questions over national security.

_90553315_power_station_stats.png

The Department for Business said: "After Hinkley, the British government will take a special share in all future nuclear new build projects. This will ensure that significant stakes cannot be sold without the government's knowledge or consent."

It added: "There will be reforms to the government's approach to the ownership and control of critical infrastructure to ensure that the full implications of foreign ownership are scrutinised for the purposes of national security."

However, Barry Gardiner, the shadow energy secretary, claimed that the government already had powers to halt the sale of any element of the UK's critical infrastructure and dismissed the new measures as "window dressing".

For more go to this link:-
http://www.bbc.com/news/business-37369786
 
UK confirms Chinese-funded Hinkley nuclear project with "new agreement"
2016-09-15 15:33:16 Xinhua Web Editor: Fei Fei

View attachment 334659
A photo taken on November 12, 2013 shows the front of Hinkley Point, a nuclear power station near Bridgwater in Somerset, England. [Photo: CFP]

The UK government on Thursday said that it had confirmed the Hinkley Point C nuclear power plant will go ahead following a new agreement with French company EDF.

The latest move came two months after the new government called for a review of the nuclear program.

British Secretary of State for Business Greg Clark said in a statement that the government had decided to give the green light to the country's first nuclear power plant in two decades but added that new measures would be taken to enhance security.

The Hinkley Point C plant, to be co-built by China General Nuclear Power Corp., which has a one-third stake, and French state-owned company EDF, would help address Britain's future energy demands.


Good progress for CGN, however I'm cautiously optimistic about the deal. My concern is not about UK, but the French partner EDF-Areva.
  • Other attempts to build an EPR plant have also run into trouble. A project by the French group Areva in Finland is decade late and more than €5bn over budget, causing the collapse of the company earlier this year. Hinkley Point C may be the last chance for EDF to prove that the EPR is viable and to win further orders.
  • Critics of the Hinkley Point deal within EDF say that while the project has potential benefits, it also carries great risks. They worry about the risk of another difficult construction programme when the company already has a stretched balance sheet. The chief financial officer of the company, Thomas Piquemal, resigned earlier this year because of concerns that if the construction goes wrong it could end up destroying the company. EDF’s €37bn of net debt dwarfs its €22bn market capitalisation. It faces an estimated €55bn bill in the coming decade just to increase the life expectancy of the 58 nuclear power stations from their current 40 years to 50. It also has to rescue its rival Areva, buying the majority of its €2.5bn reactor business. Some fear that the £18bn Hinkley Point deal, while making up only around 15 per cent of their capital expenditure a year for 10 years, will be the final straw.
  • Gérard Magnin, one of France’s state representatives on the board, resigned last month over these very concerns. “Let us hope that Hinkley Point will not drag EDF into the same abyss as Areva,” said in his resignation letter.
  • “Given the project history of the EPR technology, market confidence in HPC being built on time/on budget, and therefore create shareholder value, is understandably low,” said Ahmed Farman, analyst at Jefferies.
I believe UK government, EDF and CGN are fully aware of these risks, and have finally agreed on a solution to mitigate them. CGN's technological (e.g. Hualong One), engineering, manufacturing (supply chain of heavy/critical components) and financial resources could bring tremendous value to the UK project.

image.png


http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/78f1702a-79b7-11e6-97ae-647294649b28.html#axzz4KRLUx2AL
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom