China bans immoral songs online

[Aepsilons]

Well, that does not help you skip to pay for your crime.

The war has been over for 70 years now, I think its time to move on.

 

[CCP]

Nice one! And Chinese mems always slap us as "double standard"

Well, everyone can be "double standard", but everything determined by who is more powerful.

The war has been over for 70 years now, I think its time to move on.

Yes, let see how many japanese can left this time.

I hope some japanese can survive and to show us the "ancient japanaese civilization".

 

[Aepsilons]

Nice one! And Chinese mems always slap us as "double standard"

Of course. And do note that I specifically noted that not all Chinese members are like this, only some , and you know who these "some" are, they are the ones who are chronically banned, and re-manifest themselves in new usernames and accounts. The writing styles as well as IP trackers are very helpful to differentiate them.

Most of the good Chinese members here are not like this, I can discuss with them with no problem. And they are very much progressive minded, unfortunately it is the very few yet "numerous accounts" that give a bad image for Chinese here in PDF.

 

[gambit]

Given, I agree that what Japan did in China was wrong, and there is no defense for some of the inhuman crimes against humanities, especially what happened in Nanjing. For me, brutality is brutality, there is no exception, there should be no exception.

There maybe no possible moral defense for what happened in WW II, but that does not mean we hold the son responsible for the father's sin. That is medieval mentality and the cause of so much troubles, small and large, in this world, from both sides.

 

[Aepsilons]

There maybe no possible moral defense for what happened in WW II, but that does not mean we hold the son responsible for the father's sin. That is medieval mentality and the cause of so much troubles, small and large, in this world, from both sides.

It is the mature way of going about with relationships, my friend; individual and nation-wide.

 

[EAsian]

Perhaps you're not comprehending the concept I'm trying to point out. I even addressed the issue point by point.

Regards,
Kindly,
@Nihonjin1051

What hypocritism？So blaming Japanese invaders makes us hypocritical？How about those Americans and Britishers who supported American foreign wars but hate nazis？Are they hypocritical？Are we claiming that due to have been invaded by japan，we are angels？

 

[gambit]

Look who is talking, didn't you like posting the tank man photo all the time insinuating he was crushed by the tank just as many thousands who were massacred according to your brainwashed view? We have already posted the English sources that the massacre was nothing more than propaganda tricks which you claim the US has mastered it.

Fine...Then do nothing to censor anything that may even insinuate there was a massacre in Tiananmen Square. If the truth is that nothing so atrocious happened, the truth will stand on its own, right ? The US does not have a monopoly on propaganda, right ?

 

[Aepsilons]

What hypocritism？So blaming Japanese invaders makes us hypocritical？

Yes, it is ABSOLUTELY hypocritical to lambast brutality and at the same time support and even defend the use of brutal military tactics and crowd suppression on a gathering of un-armed citizens , through the use of military force such as tanks and machine guns.

Brutality is brutality, there is no partiality. You're either completely against it (in its forms) or you're not against it at all.

 

[CCP]

Fine...Then do nothing to censor anything that may even insinuate there was a massacre in Tiananmen Square. If the truth is that nothing so atrocious happened, the truth will stand on its own, right ? The US does not have a monopoly on propaganda, right ?

Well, US do have a monopoly on propaganda for a long time.

You forgot how US claimed mass destruction weapon in Iraq?

 

[xesy]

Well, US do have a monopoly on propaganda for a long time.

You forgot how US claimed mass destruction weapon in Iraq?

They failed hard that time. Even their own people didn't buy that lie.

 

[CCP]

Yes, it is ABSOLUTELY hypocritical to lambast brutality and at the same time support and even defend the use of brutal military tactics and crowd suppression on a gathering of un-armed citizens , through the use of military force such as tanks and machine guns.

Brutality is brutality, there is no partiality. You're either completely against it (in its forms) or you're not against it at all.

Well, you may pray for a quick death (by nuke) but not wait for PLA land on your islands.

 

[xesy]

Of course. And do note that I specifically noted that not all Chinese members are like this, only some , and you know who these "some" are, they are the ones who are chronically banned, and re-manifest themselves in new usernames and accounts. The writing styles as well as IP trackers are very helpful to differentiate them.

Most of the good Chinese members here are not like this, I can discuss with them with no problem. And they are very much progressive minded, unfortunately it is the very few yet "numerous accounts" that give a bad image for Chinese here in PDF.

Agree. Some Chinese mems are actually easy to talk with, and we can even come to term on some issues. However, I notice a recent rise of "unhelpful" mems who just love to derail topics with their trolling talks or aggressive language. Bad images indeed.

 

[Aepsilons]

They failed hard that time. Even their own people didn't buy that lie.

Precisely, and the difference here is that the US has an open media. No other country can you find in the world that enables their citizens to have an active role in government criticism in how it handles business. The Iraq War is a great example of how the citizens are demanding their leaders accountable for such gross negligence in information.

Another example was the recent police brutality situation in the United States, which have led to a Nation-wide protest "Black lives matter" that have resulted in a senate and congression led review of how certain counties, states, and cities handle police matters.

Therein lies the difference. America is "open" in regards to accountability issues, whereas some other countries remain closed in security and defense related issues.

Agree. Some Chinese mems are actually easy to talk with, and we can even come to term on some issues. However, I notice a recent rise of "unhelpful" mems who just love to derail topics with their trolling talks or aggressive language. Bad images indeed.

Many of them are not even from China, many are false flaggers. I know. Many also use numerous accounts and have the same IP.

 

[EAsian]

Yes, it is ABSOLUTELY hypocritical to lambast brutality and at the same time support and even defend the use of brutal military tactics and crowd suppression on a gathering of un-armed citizens , through the use of military force such as tanks and machine guns.

Brutality is brutality, there is no partiality. You're either completely against it (in its forms) or you're not against it at all.

What are you talking about？Did those Chinese claim they are saint and hate all kind of brutality？If not？How came the word hypocritical？

 

[CCP]

Agree. Some Chinese mems are actually easy to talk with, and we can even come to term on some issues. However, I notice a recent rise of "unhelpful" mems who just love to derail topics with their trolling talks or aggressive language. Bad images indeed.

FYI, this post is detail at the post #34 by @gambit.