What's new

China Automobile Industry, Technology (NEV, Driverless, etc): News & Images

Stirring anti-chinese sentiment here is not in Geely best interest.
Agree, I guess Geely has hired professionals to advise them on PR or publicity, wish they have hired the good ones!

It might as well be that the sides wanted to have a performance-based ownership. If partnership with Geely generates value for both sides, then, the share structure may be rearranged for full ownership.
Perhaps, but whether shareholding threshold can be removed or not subject to law or policy, it can be quite rigid. Beijing has similar policy, SOE always hold 50%+ stake in JV, retains veto on major resolutions (scope and definition subject to prior agreements made before equity deal), while the foreign partner in-charge of brand management, has strong management influence on operations. In plain language, the majority stakeholder can be a relatively "silent" partner, instead the minority stakeholder can be "actively" managing the JV.
 
Agree, I guess Geely has hired professionals to advise them on PR or publicity, wish they have hired the good ones!


Perhaps, but whether shareholding threshold can be removed or not subject to law or policy, it can be quite rigid. Beijing has similar policy, SOE always hold 50%+ stake in JV, retains veto on major resolutions (scope and definition subject to prior agreements made before equity deal), while the foreign partner in-charge of brand management, has strong management influence on operations. In plain language, the majority stakeholder can be a relatively "silent" partner, instead the minority stakeholder can be "actively" managing the JV.
Geely main goal is to qualify for preferrential tariff rates under the ASEAN Free Trade Agreement (AFTA) when exporting to neighbouring ASEAN countries. We are talking about 30% price advantage.
 
Geely main goal is to qualify for preferrential tariff rates under the ASEAN Free Trade Agreement (AFTA) when exporting to neighbouring ASEAN countries. We are talking about 30% price advantage.
Yes, if that's the goal, this deal (acquiring stake in Proton) is valuable to Geely's expansion strategy.
 
Geely main goal is to qualify for preferrential tariff rates under the ASEAN Free Trade Agreement (AFTA) when exporting to neighbouring ASEAN countries. We are talking about 30% price advantage.

But isn't there already CAFTA in place since 2002 - and upgraded several times ever since?

These is from import exemption list by Malaysia under CAFTA:

upload_2017-5-24_15-27-10.png
 
But isn't there already CAFTA in place since 2002 - and upgraded several times ever since?

These is from import exemption list by Malaysia under CAFTA:

View attachment 398945
Common Effective Preferential Tariff (CEPT) requires at least 40% content originates from any Member State. Do you have links for CAFTA? I'm confuse now.

#Edit:
RULES OF ORIGIN

  • In order to enjoy the preferential tariff concession under the ACFTA, the products exported by ASEAN or China must comply with the Rules of Origin (ROO). The two most important requirements under the ROO are the origin criteria and the Operational Certification of Procedures (OCP) for issuance and verification of the Certificate of Origin, Form E.
  • According to Article 5 of the Trade in Goods Agreement, the current origin criteria imposed under the ACFTA is General ROO 40% Regional Value Content (RVC) and limited application of Product Specific Rules (PSR). The formula for the 40% ACFTA content is calculated as follows:

    acfta.png
The ACFTA content = 100% - Non-ACFTA Materials = at least 40%

  • Apart from the General ROO, ASEAN and China have also adopted Product Specific Rules (PSR) for the following products:
    • textiles and apparel;

    • plastic products;

    • footwear products;

    • iron and steel products;

    • preserved fish and canned products;

    • palm oil and ice cream; and

    • jewelry products.
  • ASEAN and Chinese exporters/manufacturers now have the flexibility of choosing the most convenient rule in meeting the origin criteria of the products i.e., either 40% Regional Value Content (RVC) or PSR.
  • To obtain the Certificate of Origin Form E, exporters are also required to fulfill the conditions for the issuance and verification of the Form E. Further improvement on Operational Certificate Procedures (OCP) was carried out to simplify the rules and trading procedures under the ACFTA.
http://fta.miti.gov.my/index.php/pages/view/asean-china
upload_2017-5-24_17-51-30.png
 
Last edited:
Common Effective Preferential Tariff (CEPT) requires at least 40% content originates from any Member State. Do you have links for CAFTA? I'm confuse now.

#Edit:
RULES OF ORIGIN

  • In order to enjoy the preferential tariff concession under the ACFTA, the products exported by ASEAN or China must comply with the Rules of Origin (ROO). The two most important requirements under the ROO are the origin criteria and the Operational Certification of Procedures (OCP) for issuance and verification of the Certificate of Origin, Form E.
  • According to Article 5 of the Trade in Goods Agreement, the current origin criteria imposed under the ACFTA is General ROO 40% Regional Value Content (RVC) and limited application of Product Specific Rules (PSR). The formula for the 40% ACFTA content is calculated as follows:

    acfta.png
The ACFTA content = 100% - Non-ACFTA Materials = at least 40%

  • Apart from the General ROO, ASEAN and China have also adopted Product Specific Rules (PSR) for the following products:
    • textiles and apparel;

    • plastic products;

    • footwear products;

    • iron and steel products;

    • preserved fish and canned products;

    • palm oil and ice cream; and

    • jewelry products.
  • ASEAN and Chinese exporters/manufacturers now have the flexibility of choosing the most convenient rule in meeting the origin criteria of the products i.e., either 40% Regional Value Content (RVC) or PSR.
  • To obtain the Certificate of Origin Form E, exporters are also required to fulfill the conditions for the issuance and verification of the Form E. Further improvement on Operational Certificate Procedures (OCP) was carried out to simplify the rules and trading procedures under the ACFTA.
http://fta.miti.gov.my/index.php/pages/view/asean-china
View attachment 398960

I got the data from here:

http://fta.mofcom.gov.cn/topic/chinaasean.shtml

Scroll down and you will see full text of the agreement.

This website is also very informative:

http://www.cafta.org.cn
 
Chinese carmaker’s partnership with Proton to create more job opportunities

proton24051700001220still002.ashx

PUTRAJAYA: The entry of a major Chinese carmaker into Proton Holdings Bhd will not only ease its financial woes, but also bring fresh capacity to the group’s underutilised factories.

Zhejiang Geely Automotive Co Ltd plans to turn Malaysia into its global hub to manufacture all of its right-hand drive cars, including its premium Volvo brand.

Geely will take a leadership role in production, sales and marketing. Proton will be responsible for distribution of the brand in Malaysia.

These were among the highlights mentioned at the signing ceremony in Putrajaya between DRB-Hicom, the parent company of Proton, and Geely.


Proton and Geely yesterday signed an agreement that would see Geely take a 49.9% stake in Proton. Both parties have not finalised the price Geely would pay for the stake.

Through the partnership, Geely executive vice-president and chief financial officer Daniel Li said Geely would focus on assisting Proton to sell 500,000 cars in Malaysia and around the region by 2020.


05b222b956254c198d5571d0daf331f6.ashx




He said Geely would be contributing technology, talent and money to Proton. These include platform-sharing that would see the development of Proton’s first-ever SUV model from Geely’s best selling model – the Boyue.

DRB-Hicom group managing director Datuk Seri Syed Faisal Albar said in the competitive automotive industry, partnership among carmakers globally was common.

A partnership would also further expand Proton’s reach to other markets and give it better economies of scale.

“This partnership with Geely will create more jobs in Proton,” he told reporters yesterday.

Proton has a workforce of about 10,000 which produces about 100,000 cars a year. In 2016, sales of Proton cars dropped 30% to 72,290 units from 102,174 previously.

The company reported a loss of almost RM1bil last year.

Proton’s Tanjung Malim plant, which is designed to produce a million cars every year, will be made a new manufacturing hub for Geely.

Syed Faisal said Proton would relocate its entire production from Shah Alam to Tanjung Malim within five years.

Despite the entry of a new foreign partner, Proton will maintain its national car status. This means its industrial linkages, including vendors and dealers, will not be affected by the change in shareholding.

90fdbc09a4d24a35a54f945ac910594c.ashx




Under the heads of agreement signed between DRB-Hicom and Geely, the Chinese carmaker will take a 49.9% equity interest in Proton and also a controlling stake in Lotus, the British sportscar maker, from Proton.

No financial details were disclosed in the sale of a stake in Proton, while for Lotus, Geely would be paying £51mil (RM284mil) for a 51% stake in Lotus.

Syed Faisal said DRB-Hicom planned to sign a definitive agreement with Geely in July.

Also present at the signing ceremony was Second Finance Minister Datuk Seri Johari Abdul Ghani, who clarified that with the partnership with Geely in place, Proton would need to repay its RM1.25bil soft loan from the Government.

As part of the conditions for the soft loan, Proton was required to collaborate with a well-known strategic partner.

The requirement to collaborate with a well-known strategic partner was imposed on Proton as part of the conditions issued by the Government for its approval of the RM1.25bil soft loan to Proton, in which a bulk of the money was used to pay its vendors.

Separately, Johari said Proton was entitled to a RM1.1bil reimbursement from the Government for its RM3.5bil spent on research and development in the past.

Johari also said there would be no more “subsidy” for Proton from now on, and that the Government would no longer have a golden share in Proton with Geely entering into a partnership with the national carmaker.


Read more at http://www.thestar.com.my/news/nati...-on-firm-footing-chinese/#YikBJC8oKwLHC4ph.99
 
Proton deal to help Geely rev up in SE Asia market
By LI FUSHENG | China Daily | Updated: 2017-05-25

d8cb8a14fbeb1a90539605.jpg

Models unveil the Lotus 410 sport automobile, produced by Group Lotus Plc, a luxury unit of Proton Holdings Bhd, during the 86th Geneva International Motor Show in Geneva, Switzerland, last year. BLOOMBERG VIA GETTY IMAGES

Zhejiang-based company to take 49.9% stake in Malaysian carmaker

Chinese automaker Zhejiang Geely Holding Group is to buy 49.9 percent of Malaysia's largest car manufacturer Proton, with a final agreement expected to be signed in July, a move that will speed up its inroads into the Southeast Asian market.

The forthcoming acquisition is part of a binding contract it signed with Proton's parent company DRB-Hicom, Geely said on Wednesday, although the value of the deal was not released.

The Chinese automaker, which will be Proton's only foreign partner, will also enjoy a 51 percent share of Lotus, a British sports carmaker owned by Proton.

Geely said the agreement laid the foundations for a wider framework for it to explore joint synergies in areas such as research and development, manufacturing and market presence.

Proton, founded in 1983 by Malaysian prime minister Mahathir Mohamad, was once one of Malaysia's flagship companies. However, it has been struggling with falling sales in recent years.

Proton sold around 72,000 cars in 2016, a 54 percent slump from its record high of 158,700 vehicles in 2011.

Last year, the carmaker received 1.5 billion ringgit ($338.2 million) in government aid on the condition that it pursued a turnaround plan and sought a foreign partner.

In addition to Geely, several other companies expressed interest, including French carmaker PSA Group, Japan's Suzuki Motor Corp and French carmaker Renault Group.

Li Donghui, executive vice-president of Geely, said: "With Proton and Lotus joining the Geely Group portfolio of brands, we strengthen our global footprint and develop a beachhead in Southeast Asia."

Li said Geely will help restore Proton to its former glory with its technology and management resources, and also aim to unleash the full potential of Lotus cars and bring it into a new phase of development.

Lotus has formed a joint venture with a Guangdong-based company to localize production of its cars in China, with the first model set to roll off the assembly line in 2019. But analysts said that Geely's main goal in the short term was to make inroads in Southeast Asia.

Yale Zhang, managing director of consulting firm Automotive Foresight, said acquisition is the best way for Geely to get a foothold in the region that has long been dominated by Japanese brands.

Proton's manufacturing facilities will also qualify the Chinese automaker to ship vehicles tax-free anywhere among the 10 members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, with a combined population of more than 600 million people.
 
Dr M cries over Proton deal with Chinese firm

Malay Mail Online - Thursday May 25, 2017 12:27 PM GMT+8

pakatan_harapan_ceramah_2205_(4).jpg

Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad said he could not be proud of Proton’s future success because it would no longer
belong to him or to Malaysia. — Picture by Yusof Mat Isa

KUALA LUMPUR, May 25 ― Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad lamented today over the sale of a 49.9 per cent stake in Malaysia’s national carmaker Proton, once the country’s source of pride, to Chinese automaker Zhejiang Geely Holding Group.

The former prime minister, who had founded Proton Holdings in 1983 in a bid to turn Malaysia into an industrialised powerhouse, said he could not be proud of Proton’s future success because it would no longer belong to him or to Malaysia.

I am a sissy. I cry even if Malaysians are dry-eyed. My child is lost. And soon my country. Please excuse me,” Dr Mahathir wrote on his blog.

Proton the child of my brain has been sold. It is probably the beginning of the great sell-out. The process is inexorable. No other way can we earn the billions to pay our debts. The only way is to sell our assets. And eventually we will lose our country, a great country no doubt, but owned by others,” added the country’s longest serving prime minister.

The deal between Proton parent DRB-Hicom and Geely was announced yesterday, with Second Finance Minister Datuk Seri Johari Abdul Ghani saying that Proton would remain a national car because Proton would still have a majority hold of 50.1 per cent.

International newswire Reuters reported that Geely was expected to offer Proton some vehicle technologies in order to grow its sales overseas and to recover some of the global presence Proton had lost in recent years.

Proton reportedly dominated the domestic market by 74 per cent in 1993 at its peak, but saw its market share dwindle to around 15 per cent currently due to low-quality cars, poor after-sales service and tough competition from foreign automakers.

Dr Mahathir said he was certain that Proton would now be sold all over the world.

It will be like Singapore. Malaysians are proud of this great city-state. If it had not been sold it would be, perhaps, as well developed as Kuala Kedah or Kuala Perlis. Then we cannot be proud of Singapore,” he said.

Now we can be proud of Proton. With money and superior technology it will compete with Rolls Royce and Bentley. But I cannot be proud of its success. I cannot be proud of the success of something that does not belong to me or my country. Maybe other Malaysians will, but not me,” added the 91-year-old.

* * * * *

Read like a lament from a senile personality, rather out of touch with reality. Folks should ask Dr. M whether he likes more seeing the slow but sure demise of the car manufacturer crushed by the Japanese automotive in its own home court... what pride is left out in dealing with a dead entity??? :woot:

Now you see why the sale is just 49.9%? :p: Just for a very obvious reason.
 
Last edited:
Dr M cries over Proton deal with Chinese firm

Malay Mail Online - Thursday May 25, 2017 12:27 PM GMT+8

pakatan_harapan_ceramah_2205_(4).jpg

Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad said he could not be proud of Proton’s future success because it would no longer
belong to him or to Malaysia. — Picture by Yusof Mat Isa

KUALA LUMPUR, May 25 ― Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad lamented today over the sale of a 49.9 per cent stake in Malaysia’s national carmaker Proton, once the country’s source of pride, to Chinese automaker Zhejiang Geely Holding Group.

The former prime minister, who had founded Proton Holdings in 1983 in a bid to turn Malaysia into an industrialised powerhouse, said he could not be proud of Proton’s future success because it would no longer belong to him or to Malaysia.

I am a sissy. I cry even if Malaysians are dry-eyed. My child is lost. And soon my country. Please excuse me,” Dr Mahathir wrote on his blog.

Proton the child of my brain has been sold. It is probably the beginning of the great sell-out. The process is inexorable. No other way can we earn the billions to pay our debts. The only way is to sell our assets. And eventually we will lose our country, a great country no doubt, but owned by others,” added the country’s longest serving prime minister.

The deal between Proton parent DRB-Hicom and Geely was announced yesterday, with Second Finance Minister Datuk Seri Johari Abdul Ghani saying that Proton would remain a national car because Proton would still have a majority hold of 50.1 per cent.

International newswire Reuters reported that Geely was expected to offer Proton some vehicle technologies in order to grow its sales overseas and to recover some of the global presence Proton had lost in recent years.

Proton reportedly dominated the domestic market by 74 per cent in 1993 at its peak, but saw its market share dwindle to around 15 per cent currently due to low-quality cars, poor after-sales service and tough competition from foreign automakers.

Dr Mahathir said he was certain that Proton would now be sold all over the world.

It will be like Singapore. Malaysians are proud of this great city-state. If it had not been sold it would be, perhaps, as well developed as Kuala Kedah or Kuala Perlis. Then we cannot be proud of Singapore,” he said.

Now we can be proud of Proton. With money and superior technology it will compete with Rolls Royce and Bentley. But I cannot be proud of its success. I cannot be proud of the success of something that does not belong to me or my country. Maybe other Malaysians will, but not me,” added the 91-year-old.

* * * * *

Read like a lament from a senile personality, rather out of touch with reality. Folks should ask Dr. M whether he likes more seeing the slowly but sure demise of the car manufacturer crushed by the Japanese automotive in its own home court... what pride left dealing with a corpse??? :woot:

Now does one grasp it why the sale is just 49.9%? :p:D Just for a very obvious reason.
His blog link. If you are interested.
http://chedet.cc/?p=2524
 
Geely Acquires 49.9% of Malaysia’s Proton, Controlling Stake in Lotus

May 24, 2017 Alan Harman | WardsAuto

The Chinese automaker beats out PSA Group in months-long bidding for the financially beleaguered Malaysian automaker, giving it entre to markets in the ASEAN region.

web-proton-pix.jpg

Proton joins Volvo in Geely’s growing brand collection.

After 34 years trying to drive Malaysia into the heady realms of the global vehicle industry, the country’s money-losing first national car company is ceding control to Chinese giant Zhejiang Geely Holding Group.

Owner DRB-Hicom is selling 49.9% of Proton to the Chinese manufacturer and also is discarding all of Proton’s 100% holding in British sports car manufacturer Lotus.

Geely will take a 51% stake in Lotus, and DRB-Hicom is quitting the sport car business by selling the other 49% to Etika Automotif.

No price was given for Geely’s investment in the joint venture.

“Both parties expect to sign the definitive agreement in July,” a DRB-Hicom statement says.

This will follow regulatory and shareholder approval.

The deal allows Geely a fast entrance into the Southeast Asia region, while Proton sees the Chinese automaker as its route to recovery after annual losses of about RM1 billion ($233 million).

Proton will gain access to the Chinese manufacturer’s existing markets. Geely’s holdings around the world include 16 manufacturing plants, seven design studios and five R&D centers.

Geely gets an instant R&D and manufacturing presence in the ASEAN region as well as access to Proton’s two underused manufacturing plants with their combined capacity of 400,000 units a year.

“The deal will enable Proton to tap into Geely Holding’s vast range of platforms and powertrains and will also enable Proton to have access to existing markets of the Chinese carmaker, as well as right-hand-drive markets in Southeast Asia,” DRB-Hicom says.

DRB-Hicom Managing Director Faisal Albar predicts Proton will grow significantly with its new foreign strategic partner (FSP).

“Our intention was always to ensure the revitalization of the Proton nameplate,” Faisal says. “It was Malaysia’s first national car brand and has more than 30 years of history. This deal will be the catalyst to elevate a brand that Malaysians resonate with.”

Geely says the alliance will allow it and Proton to explore joint synergies in areas such as R&D, manufacturing and marketing.

The Chinese automaker says it is committed to supporting the transformation of Proton and Lotus with its expertise, and aims to build Proton into the most competitive brand in Malaysia and a leading brand in Southeast Asia.

Geely also sees a route through Proton to boosting deliveries in right-hand-drive markets including Malaysia, the U.K., India and Australia.

“With Proton and Lotus joining the Geely Group portfolio of brands, we strengthen our global foot print and develop a beachhead in Southeast Asia,” Geely Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Donghui Li says in a statement. “We will fully respect the brand’s history and culture to restore Proton to its former glory with the support of Geely’s innovative technology and management resources.

“We also aim to unleash the full potential of Lotus Cars and bring it into a new phase of development, thanks to our experience accumulated through Volvo Car’s revitalization.” Li says.

Geely’s selection as Proton’s FSP comes after two months of intense negotiations that twice saw Geely announce to the international media that it had quit the talks with DRB-Hicom.

The battle for Proton began when it was forced to ask the Malaysian government for a RM1.5 billion ($349.3-million) soft loan last year so it could pay its vendors.

Prime Minister Najib Razak approved the loan on condition Proton sign up with a foreign strategic partner.

In the end, it came down to a faceoff between France’s PSA Group, which owns Peugeot, Citroen, DS, Opel and Vauxhall, and Geely, which owns Sweden’s Volvo and Britain’s London Taxi.

Proton, although now unsuccessful, is in a growing auto market – the 10-country ASEAN free-trade region – with its increasingly affluent population of more than 600 million people.

PSA wants a factory for its ASEAN market either in Indonesia, Thailand or Malaysia. Starting from scratch would see a $2-billion cost to buy land, build a factory and train several thousand staff. It also could take three to five years.

The French automaker saw Proton – the only full-fledged auto manufacturer in the region –as the way to short-circuit that laborious route. The Malaysian company has 30 years of experience in research and development, design, marketing, sales and distribution. It also has a full vendor and supplier network.

China-based Geely, whose domestic sales rose 50% last year to 765,851 units, has a strong European brand in Volvo, but is weak in the ASEAN region.

The JV agreement says DRB-Hicom and Geely will establish a 10-year business plan for the Proton Group that will include new models to be launched, capital expenditure projections, manufacturing and sales targets, technology licenses and royalties.

The business plan sets a goal of becoming the leading automaker in Malaysia by market share, being at least the third-leading automaker in ASEAN by market share and the Proton Group being in a positive EBITDA position and profitable as soon as practically possible.

“The proposed joint venture, when implemented, is intended to enable the Proton Group to increase its manufacturing capacity, elevate brand confidence, penetrate global markets especially in Southeast Asia, and leverage on Geely’s advanced technology, extensive business network and global best practices,” the agreement says.

It says Geely’s wealth of knowledge and its extensive network of partnership, collaborations and joint ventures in the automotive industry over the years puts it in a position to assist Proton in its drive to improve its market position.

“In particular, the participation of Geely, a fast-growing automotive player, as the (strategic partner) of Proton Holdings is expected to further strengthen and improve Proton Group’s operations in terms of improved manufacturing systems and effective distribution networks and, more importantly, enhance its presence in regional markets,” the agreement says.

Both sides say the proposed deal is expected to create business synergies and opportunities for DRB-Hicom, Geely and Proton.

“The company (DRB-Hicom) intends to safeguard the recognition of Proton as Malaysia’s original national car company while building and enhancing Malaysia’s national automotive industry and facilitating the goal of making Malaysia a preferred automotive hub in Southeast Asia capable of rivalling neighboring countries in the region,” the agreement states.

The Star newspaper reports the government will reimburse Proton Holdings RM1.1 billion ($256.2 million) as a grant for money spent on R&D in the past, adding after that there will be no more subsidies for Proton.

The Edge newspaper, which first reported Geely as the winner in the competition for Proton, earlier said the government had given Proton a new line of credit of RM1.7 billion ($395.9 million) after the first loan was used up paying vendors.

It is a far cry from the heady days of 1983 when Proton was established by the government of then-Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad.

It began life building rebadged Mitsubishi vehicles, and by 1985 it had 47% of the Malaysian market. This grew to 65% in 1987. Its glory days peaked in 1993 at 74%.

By 2006, it had lost its market lead to Perodua, the second Malaysian car manufacturer, which has dominated the market since.

“Malaysia has a unique industrial asset which cannot survive in a small domestic market, but can play a lynchpin role as the ASEAN anchor of a larger global auto group,” the government news agency Bernama reported earlier.

The agency said what Proton brought to the table was the ability to catapult the chosen foreign strategic partner with its collection of car marques into the ASEAN market.

“The big question is, which (potential partner) values Proton more and is willing to cobble together a long-term deal that makes it attractive for Proton to look east to Geely or leap west in embracing PSA?” Bernama reported.

The answer is in – it was Geely.
 
I am a sissy. I cry even if Malaysians are dry-eyed. My child is lost. And soon my country. Please excuse me,” Dr Mahathir wrote on his blog.

Proton the child of my brain has been sold. It is probably the beginning of the great sell-out. The process is inexorable. No other way can we earn the billions to pay our debts. The only way is to sell our assets. And eventually we will lose our country, a great country no doubt, but owned by others,” added the country’s longest serving prime minister.

We study regionalism a lot in the classes, and Mahathir always comes in handy when talking about exclusive regionalism from 1997. I believed he was a very smart and visionary leader.

I still believe so and I adore his EAEC proposal. He has always been a proponent of East Asian exclusive regionalization.

But his emotional lines are a bit of a surprise to me. Of course, he laments at the sell-out, not necessarily at the buyer (the French and others had also placed bids, and if not Geely, some other foreigner would buy the company), but Dr. Mahathir should nonetheless be glad that the company was bought by a China company which is known for its successful turn-around with another dying brand, Volvo Cars.
 
We study regionalism a lot in the classes, and Mahathir always comes in handy when talking about exclusive regionalism from 1997. I believed he was a very smart and visionary leader.

I still believe so and I adore his EAEC proposal. He has always been a proponent of East Asian exclusive regionalization.

But his emotional lines are a bit of a surprise to me. Of course, he laments at the sell-out, not necessarily at the buyer (the French and others had also placed bids, and if not Geely, some other foreigner would buy the company), but Dr. Mahathir should nonetheless be glad that the company was bought by a China company which is known for its successful turn-around with another dying brand, Volvo Cars.
China should send someone to meet with him if there is any respect left. After all, he is 91 year old man.
 
It will be like Singapore. Malaysians are proud of this great city-state. If it had not been sold it would be, perhaps, as well developed as Kuala Kedah or Kuala Perlis. Then we cannot be proud of Singapore,” he said.

That's a weird comparison. It's like saying he would be proud of Kuala Kedah/Perlis even after billions poured into the state and it's still an underdeveloped town. Same with Proton. He would rather have a failed company supported by the state, rather than selling it to others who will make it great. That's just egoistic rather than pragmatic.
 
Back
Top Bottom