China and Pakistan Military Tests Flank India

[KN-1]

How many times have we threatened to nuke Pakistan or any other country for that matter?
Have you ever seen your iron brothers China issuing nuke threats to USA or India?
Tell me when was the last time you heard Russia and USA exchanging nuke threats

google it yourself.. like your rulling party MP.

http://www.jantakareporter.com/india/subramanian-swamy-wants-10-crore/64231/

Why you are asking about Russia, US from me, ask them, i am sure they have threatened each other more then twice. but Pakistan didnt threatened anyone with nukes, you are far from proving Pakistan threatened you with nukes..

Every major nuclear power in the world behaves maturely when it comes to the uses of WMD except trigger happy Pakistan and North Korea.

more shit from potty mouths without any substantial proof that Pakistan ever threatened you with nukes but anyways if you bharatis will not bark against Pakistan then who will? its you job..

as of now you have one statement of MoD from multiple tabloids in which lots of ifs and buts involved, it says if our enemy invade us and our national security is at risk, instead of whining like bitch why dont your tabloid media go to your minister and ask them same question, what if China Pakistan decided to gangbang bharat and its national security is jeopardize , what will he do? almost every country have stated policy that when its national security is threatened by someone they will use everything even sticks and marbles let alone nukes.

 

[Grevion]

this is very close to Siliguri corridor.this map shows the whole story.accoding to this map(red line area is current standoff position) but it's inside bhutan.what is IA doing inside bhutan? what is the defence pact between bhutan and india?in case of war,what bhutan will do? are they going to fight against chinese or allow chinese to fight IA?

Bhutan is a democratic constitutional monarchy and they have always been wary of the communists in their north specially after the annexation of Buddhist Tibet by China in 1959. India and Bhutan have made strategic pacts for helping each other out in foreign matters and security. The armies of Bhutan and India works closely with each other against the national interests of both the countries.

this is so complex.this chicken neck will be under threat in case of war.suppose india and china fight a war and china annex this chicken neck.are there any arrangements betwwen india and bangladesh so that IA can bring reinforcement in their seven states through bangladesh(consider the scenerio that chicken neck is annexed by chinese).

Bngladesh is a friendly country to India and they are expected to provide all kind of assistance to India in case such a situation arises. However, if the need arises Indian Army will not think twice before forcefully crossing over international borders with Bangladesh if the security of our North Eastern states is threatened and Bangladesh refused to cooperate.

google it yourself.. like your rulling party MP.

http://www.jantakareporter.com/india/subramanian-swamy-wants-10-crore/64231/

Why you are asking about Russia, US from me, ask them, i am sure they have threatened each other more then twice. but Pakistan didnt threatened anyone with nukes, you are far from proving Pakistan threatened you with nukes..



more shit from potty mouths without any substantial proof that Pakistan ever threatened you with nukes but anyways if you bharatis will not bark against Pakistan then who will? its you job..

as of now you have one statement of MoD from multiple tabloids in which lots of ifs and buts involved, it says if our enemy invade us and our national security is at risk, instead of whining like bitch why dont your tabloid media go to your minister and ask them same question, what if China Pakistan decided to gangbang bharat and its national security is jeopardize , what will he do? almost every country have stated policy that when its national security is threatened by someone they will use everything even sticks and marbles let alone nukes.

It is clear who is using potty language here with his potty mouth.
A statement from an MP is alot different then a statement made by the defence minister of your country. Your defence minister, other govt officials and retired ex army chiefs had threatened India of their aatami bums multiple times in the past.

No other country including China has issued nuclear threats as much as Pakistan and North Korea. Even in the times of tension between India and China due to the military face off all the warnings of war and 'consequences' came from the global times and not from any govt official of China.

 

[KN-1]

It is clear who is using potty language here with his potty mouth.
A statement from an MP is alot different then a statement made by the defence minister of your country. Your defence minister, other govt officials and retired ex army chiefs had threatened India of their aatami bums multiple times in the past.

No other country including China has issued nuclear threats as much as Pakistan and North Korea. Even in the times of tension between India and China due to the military face off all the warnings of war and 'consequences' came from the global times and not from any govt official of China.

Offcourse, its you who is potty mouth, its you who are here to bark against Pakistan that too without any credible source, not ready to answer my question, just blabber what shupa powa media (north Korean type hyper nationalist media) feed you people..

Yeah, a MP who was a union minister (so unimportant MP ).. as for DM, you are still not able to answer on his ifs or buts, shitting from your potty mouth continuously will not make it threat, you are not done with statement of DM you want to move on non existent threat from army, fikar not beta, we will discuss all statements one by one, but first answer my question.

1. What about ifs and buts in the minister's statement?
2. What your DM will do if someone invade your country and national security is at risk of failing?
3. All nuclear countries have policies to use nukes if their national security is threatened... Yes or No?

 

[帅的一匹]

Sir
so nice of u but please can u give specifications for that launcher and missile used in it as thier is no way they cab be fired at above 200 range through visual inspection .
thanking you

Have you ever heard of Beidou navigation satellite system?

What you mean by Visual inspection? Are you kidding me?

 

[Vapnope]

You have got such a beating on LOC that NOBODY in Pak Army has
any appetite left for War with India

We keep hearing from Indian side that BAT beheaded IA soldiers, Your bunkers being blown up (That too with a video proof) and yet you claim that we are getting the beatings. A beating would stop PA once and for all, otherwise its not a beating at all.

 

[abrar khan]

How many times have we threatened to nuke Pakistan or any other country for that matter?
Have you ever seen your iron brothers China issuing nuke threats to USA or India?
Tell me when was the last time you heard Russia and USA exchanging nuke threats.
Every major nuclear power in the world behaves maturely when it comes to the uses of WMD except trigger happy Pakistan and North Korea.

Those countries you referred are responsible one unlike india. No one has devised a cold start doctrine like india against their small neighbor.
If you read about cold war b/w USSR & NATO you will come to know that both have placed their nuke, ready to fire against each other, announced or unannounced. Our announced strategy is only to keep india at its bay.
When it comes to survival one has right to take any action,

 

[Grevion]

Sir
so nice of u but please can u give specifications for that launcher and missile used in it as thier is no way they cab be fired at above 200 range through visual inspection .
thanking you

Are you the same guy - clam down @all.
Guru dutt's bhakt.
Long time no see?

1. What about ifs and buts in the minister's statement?

The ifs and buts doesn't matter. When you threatens your neighbors with a nuclear strike whatever may be the prerequisites you challenge your own credentials of being a peaceful nuclear power. No other country does that except North Korea and Pakistan andthe world doesn't takes seriously to both.

2. What your DM will do if someone invade your country and national security is at risk of failing?

Fight back with brutal force and we are capable of it. India is a big country which is impossible to be fully invaded.
We have a policy of no use against non nuclear states and no first use against nuclear states so do China. There is no non-nuclear state in the world that can defeat India in a conventional warfare.

3. All nuclear countries have policies to use nukes if their national security is threatened... Yes or No?

Answered above. Every nuclear country has a right to protect itself against external aggression but non issues stupid nuclear threats to its enemies except Pakistan and North Korea. Cause both of them knows they don't stand a chance against their adversaries in a conventional war.

 

[SrNair]

As if we cares
Doklam is in our hand and will always

 

[KN-1]

The ifs and buts doesn't matter. When you threatens your neighbors with a nuclear strike whatever may be the prerequisites you challenge your own credentials of being a peaceful nuclear power. No other country does that except North Korea and Pakistan andthe world doesn't takes seriously to both.

Ifs and buts matter, when your big neighbor threatens you daily with invasion and strikes more then north Korea on their north Korea like funny media its good to warn those low IQ scums... isn't it? ifs and buts depends on your action, ball is in your court, Pakistan will not be an aggressor, and what are you blabbering on peaceful nuclear nation.. no peaceful nuclear nation desire to attack and subdue other nuclear nation unlike some bhangeis in east..

Fight back with brutal force and we are capable of it. India is a big country which is impossible to be fully invaded.
We have a policy of no use against non nuclear states and no first use against nuclear states so do China. There is no non-nuclear state in the world that can defeat India in a conventional warfare.

Nice joke. brutal force? where was your brutal force when Pakistan conquered half Kashmir from Maharaja in 48 or in 62 when no one was able to understand whether Chinese thrust into india was faster of Indian surrender. you are no match to China and conventionally you are not strong enough to overwhelm Pakistan which we proved in 65 despite being much smaller. all you can do is attack 7 times smaller Pakistan during civil war to claim your only victory, so we know how macho you gangadeshis are.

now back to the point, i clearly asked about failing national security during war.. in which your enemy overwhelm you.. What your minister is suppose to do? will he order to destroy all bharati nukes since you are so peaceful?

Answered above. Every nuclear country has a right to protect itself against external aggression but non issues stupid nuclear threats to its enemies except Pakistan and North Korea. Cause both of them knows they don't stand a chance against their adversaries in a conventional war.

one side, now look at this, No one bark of invasion and strikes against nuclear country but low IQ bharatis yet they want to compare us with north korea but they dont tell us with whom we compare their pariah state. and i again retreat that it was not a threat, it was a policy statement, you cross the line we will turn you into a nuclear wasteland. ball is in your court. dont be belligerent, remain in your border, but as i said you fans of north korean media will not learn difference between threat and warning to belligerent much larger neighbors whose minister threaten to attack us with time of its choosing in bollywood style...

 

[Centurion2016]

Ifs and buts matter, when your big neighbor threatens you daily with invasion and strikes more then north Korea on their north Korea like funny media its good to warn those low IQ scums... isn't it? ifs and buts depends on your action, ball is in your court, Pakistan will not be an aggressor,

. dont be belligerent, remain in your border, but as i said you fans of north korean media will not learn difference between threat and warning to belligerent much larger neighbors whose minister threaten to attack us with time of its choosing in bollywood style...

India has no desire to enter a waterless desert like Pakistan.
India has no desire for a war since it is the FASTEST GROWING MAJOR ECONOMY IN THE world.

BUT .........india will not tolerate

KARGIL LIKE EXCURSIONS
MUMBAI TERROR ATTACKS

mind your own business ............AND LET INDIA achieve its DESTINY to be 3rd BIGGEST economy on the PLANET by 2030 ...

WAR is not something INDIA strives for.........BUT IF Mumbai happens or KARGIL happens THEN FULL MIGHT OF 7 OR 8 TIMES MORE powerful INDIA WILL be leashed onto PAKISTAN.

Like the REST of the FREE WORLD india HAS HAD enough of terrorists AND those rag tag countries thsat SUPPORT THEM .........DESCRIBING THEM pathetically has asymetirical warefare

 

[Grevion]

Ifs and buts matter, when your big neighbor threatens you daily with invasion and strikes more then north Korea on their north Korea like funny media its good to warn those low IQ scums... isn't it? ifs and buts depends on your action, ball is in your court, Pakistan will not be an aggressor, and what are you blabbering on peaceful nuclear nation.. no peaceful nuclear nation desire to attack and subdue other nuclear nation unlike some bhangeis in east..

When did Indian govt ever threatened Pakistan of invasion and dismemberment? We have talked about paybacks and strikes in retaliation to the continued provocations by Pak backed jihadis against the Indian state. It is you who propagate and support such attacks and when we talk of payback your ministers cry nuke threats in front of your people. Else we want to stay away as far as possible from your country as we know what a mess it is internally. Real banghis.

Nice joke. brutal force? where was your brutal force when Pakistan conquered half Kashmir from Maharaja in 48 or in 62 when no one was able to understand whether Chinese thrust into india was faster of Indian surrender. you are no match to China and conventionally you are not strong enough to overwhelm Pakistan which we proved in 65 despite being much smaller. all you can do is attack 7 times smaller Pakistan during civil war to claim your only victory, so we know how macho you gangadeshis are.

now back to the point, i clearly asked about failing national security during war.. in which your enemy overwhelm you.. What your minister is suppose to do? will he order to destroy all bharati nukes since you are so peaceful?

Man what's with this continued lies and distorted history of 47 and 65 war with you guys. Its not even funny anymore. Go and check what happened in 47,65,71 and 99 from some neutral source and not your Army certified books.
In case of an foreign power overwhelming Indian Armed forces we will make truce with the enemy and give up war instead of going full retard and suicidal but as I have said full invasion of India is never possible and no nuclear country can defeat us in a conventional warfare.

 

[Arsalan 345]

India has no desire to enter a waterless desert like Pakistan.
India has no desire for a war since it is the FASTEST GROWING MAJOR ECONOMY IN THE world.

BUT .........india will not tolerate

KARGIL LIKE EXCURSIONS
MUMBAI TERROR ATTACKS

mind your own business ............AND LET INDIA achieve its DESTINY to be 3rd BIGGEST economy on the PLANET by 2030 ...

WAR is not something INDIA strives for.........BUT IF Mumbai happens or KARGIL happens THEN FULL MIGHT OF 7 OR 8 TIMES MORE powerful INDIA WILL be leashed onto PAKISTAN.

Like the REST of the FREE WORLD india HAS HAD enough of terrorists AND those rag tag countries thsat SUPPORT THEM .........DESCRIBING THEM pathetically has asymetirical warefare

nobody wants war.kashmir is a big problem and you know that population there in kashmir favors pakistan.kashmir is a very old problem.all your deaths,all our deaths,are basically the result of this conflict.pakistan already lost bangladesh.i know refugees flee toward india in 1971 but that was pakistani civil war.indian army took advantage just like they did in siachen.you don't want to talk about kashmir and siachen but you must understand our feelings.bangladesh was a big part of our country and we lost a big territory.how can we forget it? we will never forget it.if you stop firing bullets inside kashmir, we will stop everything from our side but unfortunately this is not the case.

 

[John Reese]

China at that time itself was out-foxed & out-manoeuvred because the IA in both Sikkim & Bhutan was on higher dominating ground & the PLA would lose any conceivable military duel in that area. That’s precisely why China is now squealing with nonsensical rhetoric & targeting the June 8 remarks of the IA’s COAS. So far, the PLA has been able to mobilize only 3,000 troops opposite Doklam Plateau, whereas the IA in that area has 2 Mountain Divisions flanking both sides of the Chumbi Valley, i.e. ground-to-troops ratio is heavily in India’s favour. Furthermore, the PLA has only 3 Brigades in TAR for deployment along the LAC. If it tries to bring un-acclimatised reinforcements from the plains, these troops will suffer the same fate as that suffered by ther PLA in 1986 during the Wangdung/Sumdorong-Chu incident when more than 2,000 troops were killed by Malaria, Typhoid, Dyssentry & Diarrhoea. So it looks like this time again, India will call China’s bluff but with a great difference: this time, China will be made to lose face, unlike the quiet manner in which matters were resolved in 1986. And that too by a tiny country like Bhutan because the rest of the world (barring Pakistan) will never allow China to bully its smaller neighbor's territorial integrity. That’s why India is keeping quite, which is only making China even more hopping mad.

 

[KN-1]

When did Indian govt ever threatened Pakistan of invasion and dismemberment? We have talked about paybacks and strikes in retaliation to the continued provocations by Pak backed jihadis against the Indian state. It is you who propagate and support such attacks and when we talk of payback your ministers cry nuke threats in front of your people. Else we want to stay away as far as possible from your country as we know what a mess it is internally. Real banghis.

New Indian army chief threatens Pakistan and China
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2017/01/07/inpk-07.html

When did? its ideology of ruling sanghi RSS' political wing called BJP and north korea type media..
http://www.oneindia.com/india/we-wi...-4-pieces-says-subramanian-swamy-1862599.html

drop nukes on Pakistan : VHP
http://zeenews.india.com/rajasthan/...an-vhp-leader-acharya-dharmendra-2011278.html

yeah we know you can only bark and not bite hence your official call for strikes after hiding behind pathetic attacks as excuse which dont even deserve condemnation from Pakistan, despite knowing these attacks are consequences of brutal and oppressive occupation of Kashmir your official threaten to strike Pakistan, they knowingly bark against Pakistan just to provoke Pakistan and when Pakistan respond with warning with ifs and buts they start crying like whining bitches, oh look Pakistan... how evil is Pakistan blah blah.

Man what's with this continued lies and distorted history of 47 and 65 war with you guys. Its not even funny anymore. Go and check what happened in 47,65,71 and 99 from some neutral source and not your Army certified books.
In case of an foreign power overwhelming Indian Armed forces we will make truce with the enemy and give up war instead of going full retard and suicidal but as I have said full invasion of India is never possible and no nuclear country can defeat us in a conventional warfare.

it does not sound good from bharati who watch bollywood level propaganda.

You will handover your behind to invaders instead of nuclear retaliations? how cute.. meanwhile in parallel world.. bharatis are thinking of first strike against much smaller Pakistan..

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/31/...-may-be-rethinking-nuclear-first-strikes.html

and for the highlighted part, shupa powa wet dream,

at the end you still failed to prove DM threatens your kind, now plz dont waste my time with another reply.

 

[CalmDown@all_Dude]

Their indian coward cow piss drinker rapist hindu hanuman army ... are just bunch of cowards more than 7 lakh cowards hinduvata monkey armies who cant control Kashmir freedom fighters

Yes sir
those same 7 lakh army personnel are not enough for those kashmiri freedom fighter as that state has a special power under the constitution just like other north eastern states such as assam sikkim ,
yes sir they are coward enough to come to help those so called freedom fighters at time of wars and natural calamities to come to rescue from mortars and and floods , landslide and still are not capable enough to give a head shot to a coward

Are you the same guy - clam down @all.
Guru dutt's bhakt.
Long time no see?

Well Sir
I am perfectly fine
i wouldn't call that as bhakt since we do have similarity of expression and sarcasm

Have you ever heard of Beidou navigation satellite system?

were did that come from are u an

What you mean by Visual inspection

by looking at it through eyes

Are you kidding me?

no its u who posted it in wrong place at first and misrepresented data if u can't provide the specifications