China and India’s 2,000-year manufacturing reign

[IndoCarib]

Ancient Maps of India - SkyscraperCity

 

[AADHAAR]

The mighty Indus Valley Civilization existed in what is now modern-day Pakistan.

India keeps trying to claim these things from her neighbours, such as Buddhism (when in fact Buddha was born in what is now modern-day Nepal).... and the Indus Valley Civilization, which was situated in what is now modern-day Pakistan.

What gives India the right to claim the history of a great civilization that existed almost entirely within modern Pakistan's borders? Just because your culture was born from there?

But the Great Winston Churchill said.. "China is merely an imaginary expression. No such thing known as China, ever existed in history."

Isn't it CD boy..

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

^^^ As you can clearly see, one state succeeded the other for thousands of years, all claiming the same "Mandate of Heaven" to rule the nation of China.

India on the other hand was never ruled by any Central Authority. Barring a few anomalies like Ashoka's Empire, which succeeded no state, and no state succeeded it. There was no line of succession and no Central Authority to be classified as one entity.

India for the vast majority of its history was a bunch of independent kingdoms.

 

[kawaraj]

I for one wish the revival of the whole Asia, once the center of human civilization.

the west will be doomed for its evil sins over the past several centuries.

 

[IndoCarib]

---------------

 

[INDIC]

^^^ As you can clearly see, one state succeeded the other for thousands of years, all claiming the same "Mandate of Heaven" to rule the nation of China.

India on the other hand was never ruled by any Central Authority. Barring a few anomalies like Ashoka's Empire, which succeeded no state, and no state succeeded it. There was no line of succession and no Central Authority to be classified as one entity.

India for the vast majority of its history was a bunch of independent kingdoms.

I can really see in this Map China really existed as a nation, It was after Mongol Conquest that a United China was founded.

 

[Sanchez]

Idiots, "cin" was the original Sanskrit translation of Chinese Qin dynasty more than 2000 years ago. Cina, China, Sina were the derivatives of different Indo-european languages.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

But the Great Winston Churchill said.. "China is merely an imaginary expression. No such thing known as China, ever existed in history."

Isn't it CD boy..

What a typical Indian liar, Winston Churchill never said that.

But he did say this:

"India is merely a geographical expression. It is no more a single country than the Equator."

- Winston Churchill

 

[AADHAAR]

^^^ As you can clearly see, one state succeeded the other for thousands of years, all claiming the same "Mandate of Heaven" to rule the nation of China.

India on the other hand was never ruled by any Central Authority. Barring a few anomalies like Ashoka's Empire, which succeeded no state, and no state succeeded it. There was no line of succession and no Central Authority to be classified as one entity.

India for the vast majority of its history was a bunch of independent kingdoms.

O' Behen ke ....leave India.. first let's settle what Winston Churchill about China....:

"China is merely an imaginary expression. No such thing known as China, ever existed in history."

 

[SinoChallenger]

india was enslaved for the past 1000 years (800 years under Islam and 200 years under the Anglos)

 

[Jade]

The big problem of course, is that there wasn't a nation called "India" one thousand years ago, and no concept of "Indian nationalism" based on such a state.

They are basically comparing the geographic area of what comprises modern-day India. Which would be similar to comparing the geographic region of Europe as a whole.

Prove India was not an entity or just stop posting baloney.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

I can really see in this Map China really existed as a nation, It was after Mongol Conquest that a United China was founded.

Wrong, even your own map shows that China was ruled by a Central Authority for thousands of years, in successive dynasties that all claimed the same "Mandate of Heaven" to rule China.

The periods in which China was broken up were only in between the various Dynasties, and only for short periods of time. We reunited every time into the same state.

 

[AADHAAR]

india was enslaved for the past 1000 years (800 years under Islam and 200 years under the Anglos)

But CD boy says.. there was no India.. so, who or what got enslaved.

Typical chinese liars....

 

[INDIC]

What a typical Indian liar, Winston Churchill never said that.

But he did say this:

"India is merely a geographical expression. It is no more a single country than the Equator."

- Winston Churchill

Hey, I have posted some map above, I can't see China ever existed as a nation. China is a artificial state so is the Chinese language and Han people which was Putonghua-nized.

 

[AADHAAR]

Wrong, even your own map shows that China was ruled by a Central Authority for thousands of years, in successive dynasties that all claimed the same "Mandate of Heaven" to rule China.

The periods in which China was broken up were only in between the various Dynasties, and only for short periods of time. We reunited every time into the same state.

But, all this has no importance.. what is important is what Winston Churchill .. about china:

"China is merely an imaginary expression. No such thing known as China, ever existed in history."