tvsram1992
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2010
- Messages
- 3,808
- Reaction score
- -1
since how many days are you using it?^^^^^^
Needs this for his butthurt...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
since how many days are you using it?^^^^^^
Needs this for his butthurt...
lol``at least contain your inferior complexity well and use your brain to troll if you have oneGood! Let them stick with their Junk Fighter 17s and Junk 10s. Good for everybody! The chinese govt industries can make profits and kickbacks by making junks and the rest of the world stays safe. Everybody wins.
Thats why I said you are stupid as you answer your own question
You know that production without r&d is possible such as license manufacturing, but u argue/reject my statement that we could produce without r&d.
And more pathetic thing is even until now u do not realize your stupidity.
What I rant is very clear from the beginning, that : "China has r&d capability to develop so called virgilous; and it is much related to the topic.
It is you that ranting useless point like grammar etc in order to excuse your failure to comprehend my points, and it is a shame and unacceptable excuse, and this excuse demonstrate your problem with IQ or verbal capability.
You have stated the same thing/argument that I have replied/answered/broken multiple times. It means you have failed to understand my very simple reply, and it demonstrate your ignorance and idiocy.
I have said many times that China could develop virgilous with her own r&d, not by copying, and you are full of ignorance.
Besides, you have made another stupid statement above saying that no one will allow china to copy..... as if somebody else except china would be allowed to copy.
What a stupidhead copying military technology basically is not allowed for anyone - not only china; and china doesn't require somebody permission for copying/re.
I am not saying the difference of them in context of virgilous. Like i said many times to you and you are ignorant/ fail to understand, I am saying the difference of production and r&d because you were mixing them up and thought they were the same
I am expecting you could move ahead in the discussion by not repeating something that I have answered many times but you many times fail to see.
No knucklehead, I clearly stated that production without research and development is possible as long as it is licensed production . Other then that, it is not possible to mass produce even a cup without research and development.
Get it or do I need to go really sloooowwww?
Your rant is not clear and can hardly be related to the subject---again. What does license production have to do with the Virgilous? No one will let China copy it, remember? So your entire argument has been counter productive.. If you have a grasp of the English language you would know I stated license production is possible without research and development, and you would know that license production is totally not relevant to our discussion of developing something on your own.
So if we do a review we will see that your argument is totally unrelated and worthless, and it does not prove anything other then you have poor debating skills.
No knucklehead, you have stated that China can produce something without research and development and I agreed as long as it is based on license production. I never claimed that China can not produce a similar system to the Virgilous, instead I claimed it would be impossible to replicate the Virgilous, since its unique.
Wow, did I just read that correctly? Do you think China gives a rats tail if copying is allowed or not? China has a long history of copying.
I dont forget.I always knew the difference between production and research. Remember early in the discussion I stated that it is possible to produce something without research and development as long as its license based? Dont blame your poor memory and reading skills on me.
Likewise, Im expecting for you to be careful about what you accuse me of because everyone of your claims has been disproven by my earlier posts.
I have told you many times, u are very sloow.
And the stupid thing is: you are answering what you were questioning me
Now do you realize that you dont need to question me about that production without r&d, as you already answer that possibility
U are verly2 slow.
Nobody said somebody give license or let china copy virgilous, I said china develop virgilous with her own R&D.
U are really stupid head, no wonder u miss understand many things as you are so ignorant and incapable to comprehend the simplest thing
Stupidhead..
I said china could produce virgilous with her own r&d;
Nobody said china will produce virgilous by license, copy, etc.
It is you that are moronic, mixing up both r&d and production capability and claiming that china would not produce virgilous without copying/stealing/getting license/etc
Thats why I am saying u were stupid.
U said china could not copy because Europe/Usa wont allow china to copy... what a stupid statement,
as you know most copying is done without agreement/license from the owner of the tech
And am telling you what I have said from the beginning: "China has r&d capability to develop virgilous, etc"
I dont forget.
I only laugh at your answering what you were questioning
At first you argued/debated me about production without r&d, but later you said roduction actually could be done without r&d by license, it is opposing your own argument.
It is pathetically stupid.
Your earlier and repeated post has been answered/broken by me repeatedly without your capability to counter back properly except by repeating again and again the answered argument like a spoiled cd player
The only one slow here is you, how many times must I remind you that I clearly, explicitly and very directly stated that you not need research and development to produce something under license, but in all other circumstances you need research and development.
Clearly Im debating with a grade A moron that cant put two and two together.
This just proves your lower intellect. It was you that mentioned developing something under license, remember? I never questioned China developing an ECM suit, instead I stated that it would be impossible to develop something identical to the Virgilous.
The part highlighting your lower intellect is that you mentioned both matters, even worst is that both the subjects of license production and Chinas research and development share no common grounds. Further, I know you said China can develop the Virgilous, I have quoted you, what is your point?
If your intellect is not that low, why are u ranting about china's problem with copying virgilous while other are ranting argument about china's virgilous production by own r&d?Again, a sign of your lower intellect. When did I imply that you said someone will let China license copy the Virgilous?
Your are a shameless liar. When did I ever mix up research and development with production? I stated that a product can be produced without research and development as long as its under license. You seem to have a hard time grasping that dont you?
Do you ever actually think before you push the post button? If China has the R&D to develop the Virgilus (which you claimed they did) than what or why do they lack in capability? Key words here are research and development. So if China can come up with an idea which is the research part and than have the ability to produce it which is the development part than why are they incapable of developing the Virgilus?
Again U repeat argument that I have counter without your ability to broke my counter.And China can not produce the Virgilous without copying it, not because they are dumb but because it is unique and without physically studying it they will not be able to produce it, no one will. China can built an ECM that might be similar to the Virgilous but it will not be the same thing.
How is that stupid? its true. Even Chinas AWACS deal with Israel was cancelled due to US pressure, so you are the stupid one?
Already above ..Tell me something I didnt know
No they dont and I explained why. They would need to physically have a Virgilous system to copy it. Let me, tell you a little secret, ECMs all differ, even the forms of jamming varies, there are many methods of jamming, how can you be sure what type the Virgilous uses? The point is to copy the Virgilous, remember? So it would have to be identical, not similar not better, but identical.
No, the only thing pathetic is you. Producing something under license is distinctly different from producing something on your own--the discussion was about Chinas ability to produce the Virgilous, obviously China can not produce the Virgilous unless it is licensed and I stated many times no one will grant China a license to produce the Virgilous, so for China to produce something similar to the Virgilous they will need to conduct research and development. Or in other words, China producing something like the Virgilous under license is out of the question so they will definitely need research and development---let me say that again they will definitely need research and development. Understand or do I need to repeat myself again?
The problem is not me but you and your inability to comprehend anything I say.
whats the need of Su35 when we have J20 performing wonders?