@djangoSo I presume no videos of that piece of useless junk the Nirbhay and are permitted.
One does not need to be an aerospace engineer to know that what you folks produce is nothing but junk, from the INSAS to the Nirbhay!, and young fellow do not tell your seniors what to do or not to do.Kudos
There was no 'invasion' and we still retain our genetics to this day.
How do Egyptians have any connection with the culture of 'Egyptian Pagans'?
I understand English perfectly and I certainly do not need your endorsement too authenticate my education but since you are obsessed with my background, Bsc Hons Physics,,,,,,I really must have hurt you by stating a few well known truths about your nations capabilities, open up a new thread if you wish to resume the debate.Have a good day.
Do you have any idea how many times the Egyptian, Euphratic and other civilizations based on Rivers 'collapsed'?
Indo-Aryan Migration theory has been and is being rejected by many scholars and is being dropped out of school syllabuses as we speak.
What stupidity is this? Did the Mughal, British, Arab invasions of India 'kill all the native population' and replace them with Turkic, Arab and White People? There is no archaeological, genetic and historically recorded evidence of a large-scale 'genocide' - there were massacres and city sacks in times of war, but these were all common throughout the world.
The Indus Basin covers majority of Balochistan. The earliest agricultural community on the Indus plains was in Mehrgarh in Balochistan.
Your questions are very illogical and naive, but i'll answer them anyway.
Do you have any idea how many times the Egyptian, Euphratic and other civilizations based on Rivers 'collapsed'?
A 'collapse' does not mean that the inhabitants pack up their bags and go somewhere else. IVC never really (in technical terms) collapsed.
IVC cities faced decline as trade dwindled (due to destabilization in Mesopotamia) and possible Monsoon failure.
These factors made it near-impossible to maintain the cities and a breakdown in urban communities commenced. People simply went back to rural/village life. As prosperity returned, cities on the Indus like Gandhara, Taxila, Sialkot, Multan, Patalla and ect... began to form and would then transform into Kingdoms. These Kingdoms remained independant up till the Achaemenid, Greek and Mauryan invasions.
Not to mention, there was no reason to migrate. River valleys attracted people like a magnet, they were abundant in everything and led to prosperous communities. The Indus is located in such a way that it would deter any migration, to the East and West it is surrounded by the desert - to the North, you have the mountains and to the South, you have the ocean.
There is a reason why people living in the Indus Basin still carry the distinct genealogy of their ancestors.
The only confirmed and relevant migration that took place was towards Central Asia and West Europe from Northern Indus, it's the reason why Punjabs, Pashtuns, Kashmiris and Dardic People share common physical traits with Europeans.
Indo-Aryan Migration theory has been and is being rejected by many scholars and is being dropped out of school syllabuses as we speak.
Even if it did occur, a migration simply does not 'displace' people and there is no evidence that the 'natives' were displaced. Human population was small and the land was huge, there was no need for major resource/land competition. They would've most likely formed their own communities and with the passage of time, absorbed each other.
What stupidity is this? Did the Mughal, British, Arab invasions of India 'kill all the native population' and replace them with Turkic, Arab and White People? There is no archaeological, genetic and historically recorded evidence of a large-scale 'genocide' - there were massacres and city sacks in times of war, but these were all common throughout the world.
The Indus Basin covers majority of Balochistan. The earliest agricultural community on the Indus plains was in Mehrgarh in Balochistan.
YA LOL
Aryans migrated from so far but Indus Valley people didn't move an inch .
Migrations are a big part of human history .
Early Humans migrated from Africa to all parts of the world but Indus Valley people didn't moved a muscle .
Those early humans who moved from Africa don't look like Modern human living at every corner of the Earth .
Modern Africans don't look like Europeans nor Indians .
Indus Valley was often invaded by outsiders , be it Persians , Greeks or Arabs .
Migration is caused by Natural and Man made factors .
But Indus Valley people didn't migrated despite constant flooding of Indus , drying or Rivers , Desertification , Climate Change and Continuous wars .
Look at the amount of Syrians and other people from Middle east Migrating into Europe and America .
Countries with less birth rate will one day be overtaken by those ME with high birth rates .
Kashmiris migrated to Punjab before independence .
Muslims from India and Non Muslims from Pakistan Migrated at the time of partition .
Pakistanis and Indians overtaking the natives of UAE
INDUS People are indeed a Mystery
