Chengdu J-20 5th Generation Aircraft News & Discussions

[amalakas]

Can somebody put a picture of the j-20s vertical stabilizers.
P

There ya go... .....

 

[Esc8781]

Just comparing it with the f-22's and f-35 vertical stabilizers to me it looks like it might form a dihedral.

 

[amalakas]

Just comparing it with the f-22's and f-35 vertical stabilizers to me it looks like it might form a dihedral.

It is a point brought forward a few times, not to highlight J-20 shortcomings but to illustrate to some of the funboys in here that criticism is a two way game and that there are points for concern on all designs.

but alas... talk to a wall you'll get more results.

 

[gambit]

There is no point for citations because when we bring you citations (from IEEE nonetheless) you can't understand them and you ignore them.

It matters not, because even with your high school education you managed to corner yourself yet once more.

So, transmission produces wave and modulation while reflection does not? This is your corner stone argument.

Fine. What about cobalt-60 say? Does that produce any modulation ? How are you going to bend the laws of physics this time?

I can't wait to be enlightened again.

Oh and not to forget.. you clearly (and evidently to all) you have no engineering background, you didn't understand anything from that image I posted. literally anything. And it is sad because it is entry level telecomms stuff.

We all know that 'Chinese physics' are quite flexible.

 

[gambit]

Prove it that I claimed aviation experience!

You mean like this...

I am not an aerospace engineer, but for sure my aviation background is much much better than clueless ignorant child like you

You cant use winning tender as a benchmark, as we know china has not participate in any international tender for their J-11B/J-15/J-16 / J-20, so your logic is false then your argument is irrelevant.

The question is: why u are thinking MKI is better than PAKFA? while PAKFA's stealth performance is still questionable compared to J-20?

Question: 'What is the dominant variable in longitudinal stability?'
Answer: 'Power'.

YOU did not know that.

How could people with ignorant post like you try to convince other people in technology matters like aerospace?

Your knowledge about china's products obviously is limited to toys, while you need to learn and find fact that your country import a lot high tech fromchina.

Yes, do tell. How could someone as clueless as you are on first year aerodynamics is engaging in a discussion involving technical education, training and experience in the relevant fields and telling people to shut up?

 

[antonius123]

You mean like this...

Which of my sentence that saying I have experience in aviation? none!

You are evidently a liar.

Question: 'What is the dominant variable in longitudinal stability?'
Answer: 'Power'.

YOU did not know that.

Old & stupid trick.

Nobody is debating about that, it is you drag it and mix salad in order to pretend as if you were an expert. A failed expert

Where is evidence that transmission = reflection??
You are not able to prove it. Then you are a fake.

Yes, do tell. How could someone as clueless as you are on first year aerodynamics is engaging in a discussion involving technical education, training and experience in the relevant fields and telling people to shut up?

I am the one who is able to bust faker here

I debunk your numerous claim in many debates, while you failed to defend and prove your numerous claims.

Even it is proved that you dont have any clue about Aeronautics & Astronautics Study Program. What kind of Aviation expert who doesnt know that?? obviously you are faker

 

[antonius123]

There is no point for citations because when we bring you citations (from IEEE nonetheless) you can't understand them and you ignore them.

If you think my solid citation is against citation from IEEE, then it means you dont understand nor have clue about the citation you are talking about

It matters not, because even with your high school education you managed to corner yourself yet once more.

So, transmission produces wave and modulation while reflection does not? This is your corner stone argument.

Fine. What about cobalt-60 say? Does that produce any modulation ? How are you going to bend the laws of physics this time?
I can't wait to be enlightened again.

Explain what you are trying to argue with cobalt-60 is? which physics law I am going to bend?
Be clear with your argument.

Oh and not to forget.. you clearly (and evidently to all) you have no engineering background, you didn't understand anything from that image I posted. literally anything. And it is sad because it is entry level telecomms stuff.

You are obviously delusional.

I claim my engineering educational background, and I can prove it with my ability to bust and debunk you - the faked expert

While it is you, gambit and some cheerleader who find difficult time in googling evidence and defend empty claims

And it is another strong evidence that you and Gambit has no clue about "Aeronautics & Astronautics Study Program", which demonstrating your fake and clueless about aviation and the study

 

[gambit]

Which of my sentence that saying I have experience in aviation? none!

You are evidently a liar.

Right here...

I am not an aerospace engineer, but for sure my aviation background is much much better than clueless ignorant child like you

The liar and fraud is YOU.

Old & stupid trick.

Nobody is debating about that, it is you drag it and mix salad in order to pretend as if you were an expert. A failed expert

Not a trick but a test. And you flunked first year aerodynamics.

Where is evidence that transmission = reflection??
You are not able to prove it. Then you are a fake.

I have proven it many times over and those who have technical education agreed.

I am the one who is able to bust faker here

The only one you busted is yourself.

Even it is proved that you dont have any clue about Aeronautics & Astronautics Study Program. What kind of Aviation expert who doesnt know that?? obviously you are faker

I doubt that there is such a program in Indonesia. More likely you 'word salad-ed' it up.

 

[amalakas]

Right here...


The liar and fraud is YOU.


Not a trick but a test. And you flunked first year aerodynamics.


I have proven it many times over and those who have technical education agreed.


The only one you busted is yourself.


I doubt that there is such a program in Indonesia. More likely you 'word salad-ed' it up.

He has flanked 1st year education in general. period.


Antonius123 is such an expert in Aeronautics and Astronautics that he doesn't realize that if Reflection and Transmission are not equivalent (for this context) then we wouldn't have jammers..... how simple is the truth really...

 

[p3avi8tor69]

What exactly is his "aviation background" ? Plane spotting at Jakarta International Airport where he is engaged in Aeronautics & Astronautics study where they study how big and loud airliners are

 

[antonius123]

Right here...


The liar and fraud is YOU.

See... you are still denying your lie.

None of my sentence there word "experience", only "background", and now you are trying to twist background to experience.

How deep is your degree of lie and fake

Not a trick but a test. And you flunked first year aerodynamics.

Why dont you stick to the test which is currently debated? why dont you just bring citation/evidence? You obviously failed the real test, and now you are playing diverting?

I have proven it many times over and those who have technical education agreed.

The only one you busted is yourself.

Prove with what? your claim?
Claim cannot be proved by another claim, word gaming or twisting like you always do.

Only bunch of clueless like amalakas, ptldm3, and few indians fan boys that agree with you.

I doubt that there is such a program in Indonesia. More likely you 'word salad-ed' it up.

Because you have no aviation background therefore you have no clue!

FAKULTAS TEKNIK MESIN DAN DIRGANTARA / ITB » Struktur Kurikulum Program Studi Aeronotika & Astronotika

See... again you prove to be clueless. You can use google translator if you dont understand Indonesian language.

 

[antonius123]

What exactly is his "aviation background" ? Plane spotting at Jakarta International Airport where he is engaged in Aeronautics & Astronautics study where they study how big and loud airliners are

If your aviation background is as a janitor in boeing/lockheed, no wonder you have no clue about that

FAKULTAS TEKNIK MESIN DAN DIRGANTARA / ITB » Struktur Kurikulum Program Studi Aeronotika & Astronotika

 

[gambit]

See... you are still denying your lie.

None of my sentence there word "experience", only "background", and now you are trying to twist background to experience.

That is really amazing and it reveals to every ADULT on this forum the depths of your tweenage dishonesty and desperation at being busted. For every ADULT who have real jobs and earned real paychecks, the words 'background' and 'experience' are quite the same when someone is talking about him/her-self. The word 'background' is more comprehensive in that it includes education, training, experience and depth of all three.

You are caught in a lie of your own making and is now worming your way through wordplays to get out of it.

Why dont you stick to the test which is currently debated? why dont you just bring citation/evidence? You obviously failed the real test, and now you are playing diverting?

Question: What is the dominant variable in longitudinal stability?
Answer: Power.

Anyone who have real aviation background would know this. You failed and now you are telling everyone what an 'expert' you are in radar detection.

FAKULTAS TEKNIK MESIN DAN DIRGANTARA / ITB » Struktur Kurikulum Program Studi Aeronotika & Astronotika

See... again you prove to be clueless. You can use google translator if you dont understand Indonesian language.

So what if such exist in Indonesia? How does that proved that you actually attended and completed it? But when you failed to answer a first year aerodynamics question, the existence of such an education is meaningless to you.

Any wonder why you are such a truly useful idiot to the Chinese?

 

[antonius123]

That is really amazing and it reveals to every ADULT on this forum the depths of your tweenage dishonesty and desperation at being busted. For every ADULT who have real jobs and earned real paychecks, the words 'background' and 'experience' are quite the same when someone is talking about him/her-self. The word 'background' is more comprehensive in that it includes education, training, experience and depth of all three.

You are caught in a lie of your own making and is now worming your way through wordplays to get out of it.

Hahahaha.. that is according to you and few people like amalakas, ptldm3.

We dont need your other claim, as it will be empty claims as usual.
Background is not has to be experience or including field experience. This is another evidence that you are clueless and liar. Prove me if i am wrong!

Our knowledge and background can be tested here; we will be able to see whether you are real expert or fake, not the other way round like you do: trying to prove your counter debate wrong by self claiming.

If you cant prove sufficiently, then you should draw your empty claim including your such self claimed expert/experience

Question: What is the dominant variable in longitudinal stability?
Answer: Power.

Anyone who have real aviation background would know this. You failed and now you are telling everyone what an 'expert' you are in radar detection.

You repost.

Why dont you just prove and bring solid citation to prove your claim?

So what if such exist in Indonesia? How does that proved that you actually attended and completed it? But when you failed to answer a first year aerodynamics question, the existence of such an education is meaningless to you.

Any wonder why you are such a truly useful idiot to the Chinese?

Same question to you: How do you prove that you have Aviation education and experience?

 

[p3avi8tor69]

So you have no clue what experience and background means. Mommy still gives ya weekly allowance.

At least a janitor at Boeing earns an honest and decent living. You on the other hand, have to fake it to make it,

Why did it take you so long to come up with Fakultas when you have been challenged to prove your authenticity a long time ago?