S10
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2009
- Messages
- 6,066
- Reaction score
- -21
- Country
- Location
bin there done that....
Smells of bullshit
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
bin there done that....
this incident already happened your J-20 intercepted F-35 over South China SeaAll American need is send a F22 or F354 to Chinese territory to test it out.
look my below postSmells of bullshit
Smells of bullshit
But what was the outcome?bin there done that....
That's right. So did your air force found out how good is J20 yet? try shoot one down to test how good it is.bin there done that....
An interesting report made by Wu Jianqi, an academician of the Chinese Academy of Engineering and a radar expert, at the Academy.
The photos show the content displayed by the air situation system at that time, and describe in detail how the anti-stealth radar of the Chinese Air Force found the f-22 in the air defense identification zone of South Korea hundreds of kilometers away in 2013, and guided the Air Force aircraft to observe the f-22 closely.
View attachment 840978
There is no Luneburg lens, because according to Wu's speech, the conventional radar working at the same time cannot find the target. Therefore, after the anti-stealth radar found this special target, the Air Force plane was guided to observe it in order to determine the target type.Well did F-22 fly with Luneburg lens? That makes a whole lot of difference in this situation.
There is no Luneburg lens, because according to Wu's speech, the conventional radar working at the same time cannot find the target. Therefore, after the anti-stealth radar found this special target, the Air Force plane was guided to observe it in order to determine the target type.
The photo of Academician Wu's speech makes it clear that the f-22 was discovered in 2013, not the f-35. I think this should be a confirmed result of the Air Force's close observation.In fact I‘m surprised … why was that F-22/J-20 encounter? From all we know it was a F-35 but not with a Raptor. Can anyone explain more?
And that was 2013, long b4 J20, and we still have kids who think f22 is some kind of mystery to PLA.An interesting report made by Wu Jianqi, an academician of the Chinese Academy of Engineering and a radar expert, at the Academy.
The photos show the content displayed by the air situation system at that time, and describe in detail how the anti-stealth radar of the Chinese Air Force found the f-22 in the air defense identification zone of South Korea hundreds of kilometers away in 2013, and guided the Air Force aircraft to observe the f-22 closely.
View attachment 840978
I got the laws of physics.What's the hard data to back up your point then?
This tracking of the F-22 happened in 2013, so it has nothing to do with the j-20. The encounter with the j-20 and f-35 is very recent.In fact I‘m surprised … why was that F-22/J-20 encounter? From all we know it was a F-35 but not with a Raptor. Can anyone explain more?
This tracking of the F-22 happened in 2013, so it has nothing to do with the j-20. The encounter with the j-20 and f-35 is very recent.
Testing the j-20's performance in real-world use with a radar capable of spotting the f-22 is a logical move.From what I learned, there was no tracking of an F-22 by a J-20, but this - even mot mentioned which - radar was used to track F-22s on that occasion and that they were monitored. Later the J-20 was also "tested against" that radar and this report mentions in relation to this radar, how the J-20 and F-22 fared.
There was NOTHING about the F-22s being monitored by J-20s.
From what I learned, there was no tracking of an F-22 by a J-20, but this - even mot mentioned which - radar was used to track F-22s on that occasion and that they were monitored. Later the J-20 was also "tested against" that radar and this report mentions in relation to this radar, how the J-20 and F-22 fared.
There was NOTHING about the F-22s being monitored by J-20s.