samsara
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2016
- Messages
- 2,793
- Reaction score
- 8
- Country
- Location
Mr. @Asok , it's so true that NOT every one who reads this thread does really understand the aircraft engine power (Dry Thrust etc). You may ask, how many do understand the calculation between the required "engine power" and the "total weight of the aircraft"? You may wish to create a quiz poll with multiple choice answer: A, B, C, D, E... see if many know the right answer. I see PDF has the polling facility, we usually apply it at sports forums."You can swap to WS-15 if it was on purpose designed with the same spacial dimensions as the one that it would be replacing. There is no logical reason the WS-15 cannot be externally an exact replica of either the AL-3L or WS-10X engine."
Name an instance, in the world history of modern aircraft development, that was successfully done, as you just have said, that an new engine and new aircraft was "as on purpose designed, with the same spacial dimensions", to replace "externally an exact replica" of an older, much less powerful engine.
Otherwise, the Mod. will level, the charge of, groundless speculation, at you.
Even, that's possible and desirable, it still won't explain, why a 130kN-140kn engine, like WS-10b or AL-31FN could lift, a plane weighting +20 tons plus fuel, in a sustained vertical climb, without the use of AB, in front of thousands of international spectators.
I got a feeling, that this crucial point, still don't mean anything to you, and to many other readers.
I guess just a few do really know the "engine things". Inevitably you may see strange questions or remarks.